Literature DB >> 22507892

What is the clinical benefit of preoperative chemoradiotherapy with 5FU/leucovorin for T3-4 rectal cancer in a pooled analysis of EORTC 22921 and FFCD 9203 trials: surrogacy in question?

F Bonnetain1, J F Bosset, J P Gerard, G Calais, T Conroy, L Mineur, O Bouché, P Maingon, O Chapet, L Radosevic-Jelic, N Methy, L Collette.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Two phase III trials of neoadjuvant treatment in T3-4 rectal cancer established that adding chemotherapy (CRT) to radiotherapy (RT) improves pathological complete response (pCR) and local control (LC). We combined trials to assess the clinical benefit of CRT on overall (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) and to explore the surrogacy of pCR and LC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Individual patient data from European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 22921 (1011 patients) and FFCD 9203 (756 patients) were pooled. Meta-analysis methodology was used to compare neoadjuvant CRT to RT for OS, PFS LC and distant progression (DP). Weighted linear regression was used to estimate trial-level association (surrogacy R(2)) between treatment effects on candidate surrogate (pCR, LC, DP) and OS.
RESULTS: The median follow-up was 5.6 years. Compared to RT (881 pts), CRT (886 pts) did not prolong OS, DP or PFS. The 5-y OS-rate was 66.3% with CRT versus 65.9% in RT (hazard ratios (HR) = 1.04 {0.88-1.21}). CRT significantly improved LC (HR = 0.54, 95%confidence interval (CI): 0.41-0.72). PFS was validated as surrogate for OS with R(2) = 0.88. Neoadjuvant treatment effects on LC (R(2) = 0.17) or DP (R(2) = 0.31) did not predict effects on OS.
CONCLUSION: Preoperative CRT does not prolong OS or PFS. pCR or LC do not qualify as surrogate for PFS or OS while PFS is surrogate. Phase III trials should use OS or PFS as primary endpoint.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22507892     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.03.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  29 in total

1.  Center-Within-Trial Versus Trial-Level Evaluation of Surrogate Endpoints.

Authors:  Lindsay A Renfro; Qian Shi; Yuan Xue; Junlong Li; Hongwei Shang; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 1.681

Review 2.  Recent advances in multidisciplinary approach for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Eiji Oki; Koji Ando; Yuta Kasagi; Yoko Zaitsu; Masahiko Sugiyama; Yuichiro Nakashima; Hideto Sonoda; Kippei Ohgaki; Hiroshi Saeki; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Pathologic complete response and disease-free survival are not surrogate endpoints for 5-year survival in rectal cancer: an analysis of 22 randomized trials.

Authors:  Fausto Petrelli; Karen Borgonovo; Mary Cabiddu; Mara Ghilardi; Veronica Lonati; Sandro Barni
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-02

4.  2011 update in gastrointestinal cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  Vaibhav Sahai; Halla Nimeiri; Al B Benson
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2012-07

5.  Mutational and clinical predictors of pathologic complete response in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Andrea L Russo; David P Ryan; Darrell R Borger; Jennifer Y Wo; Jackie Szymonifka; Wen-Yih Liang; Eunice L Kwak; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Jeffrey W Clark; Jill N Allen; Andrew X Zhu; David L Berger; James C Cusack; Harvey J Mamon; Kevin M Haigis; Theodore S Hong
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2014-03

6.  Chronological improvement in survival following rectal cancer surgery: a large-scale, single-center study.

Authors:  Jong Lyul Lee; Chang Sik Yu; Chan Wook Kim; Yong Sik Yoon; Seok-Byung Lim; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Efficacy endpoints of radiation therapy group protocol 0247: a randomized, phase 2 study of neoadjuvant radiation therapy plus concurrent capecitabine and irinotecan or capecitabine and oxaliplatin for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Stuart J Wong; Jennifer Moughan; Neal J Meropol; Pramila Rani Anne; Lisa A Kachnic; Asif Rashid; James C Watson; Edith P Mitchell; Jondavid Pollock; R Jeffrey Lee; Michael Haddock; Beth A Erickson; Christopher G Willett
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 8.  Controversies in the multimodality management of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Robert Díaz Beveridge; Dilara Akhoundova; Gema Bruixola; Jorge Aparicio
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.064

9.  Prospective phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy with Oxaliplatin and Capecitabine in locally advanced rectal cancer (XELOXART).

Authors:  Umberto Ricardi; Patrizia Racca; Pierfrancesco Franco; Fernando Munoz; Laura Fanchini; Nadia Rondi; Vincenzo Dongiovanni; Pietro Gabriele; Paola Cassoni; Libero Ciuffreda; Mario Morino; Andrea Riccardo Filippi; Massimo Aglietta; Oscar Bertetto
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 3.064

10.  Long-term results of a randomized trial in locally advanced rectal cancer: no benefit from adding a brachytherapy boost.

Authors:  Ane L Appelt; Ivan R Vogelius; John Pløen; Søren R Rafaelsen; Jan Lindebjerg; Birgitte M Havelund; Søren M Bentzen; Anders Jakobsen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.