Literature DB >> 22507866

In vivo genotoxicity of furan in F344 rats at cancer bioassay doses.

Wei Ding1, Dayton M Petibone, John R Latendresse, Mason G Pearce, Levan Muskhelishvili, Gene A White, Ching-Wei Chang, Roberta A Mittelstaedt, Joseph G Shaddock, Lea P McDaniel, Daniel R Doerge, Suzanne M Morris, Michelle E Bishop, Mugimane G Manjanatha, Anane Aidoo, Robert H Heflich.   

Abstract

Furan, a potent rodent liver carcinogen, is found in many cooked food items and thus represents a human cancer risk. Mechanisms for furan carcinogenicity were investigated in male F344 rats using the in vivo Comet and micronucleus assays, combined with analysis of histopathological and gene expression changes. In addition, formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (Fpg) and endonuclease III (EndoIII)-sensitive DNA damage was monitored as a measure of oxidative DNA damage. Rats were treated by gavage on four consecutive days with 2, 4, and 8mg/kg bw furan, doses that were tumorigenic in 2-year cancer bioassays, and with two higher doses, 12 and 16mg/kg. Rats were killed 3h after the last dose, a time established as producing maximum levels of DNA damage in livers of furan-treated rats. Liver Comet assays indicated that both DNA strand breaks and oxidized purines and pyrimidines increased in a near-linear dose-responsive fashion, with statistically significant increases detected at cancer bioassay doses. No DNA damage was detected in bone marrow, a non-target tissue for cancer, and peripheral blood micronucleus assays were negative. Histopathological evaluation of liver from furan-exposed animals produced evidence of inflammation, single-cell necrosis, apoptosis, and cell proliferation. In addition, genes related to apoptosis, cell-cycle checkpoints, and DNA-repair were expressed at a slightly lower level in the furan-treated livers. Although a mixed mode of action involving direct DNA binding cannot be ruled out, the data suggest that furan induces cancer in rat livers mainly through a secondary genotoxic mechanism involving oxidative stress, accompanied by inflammation, cell proliferation, and toxicity. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22507866     DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2012.03.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol        ISSN: 0041-008X            Impact factor:   4.219


  11 in total

1.  In Vivo Alkaline Comet Assay and Enzyme-modified Alkaline Comet Assay for Measuring DNA Strand Breaks and Oxidative DNA Damage in Rat Liver.

Authors:  Wei Ding; Michelle E Bishop; Lascelles E Lyn-Cook; Kelly J Davis; Mugimane G Manjanatha
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Mutagenicity of furan in female Big Blue B6C3F1 mice.

Authors:  Ashley N Terrell; Mailee Huynh; Alex E Grill; Ramesh C Kovi; M Gerard O'Sullivan; Joseph B Guttenplan; Yen-Yi Ho; Lisa A Peterson
Journal:  Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 2.873

3.  Protective role of quercetin against hematotoxic and immunotoxic effects of furan in rats.

Authors:  Rasha T Alam; Ehsan H Abu Zeid; Tamer S Imam
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-11-26       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 4.  Reactive metabolites in the biotransformation of molecules containing a furan ring.

Authors:  Lisa A Peterson
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.739

5.  Furan carcinogenicity: DNA binding and genotoxicity of furan in rats in vivo.

Authors:  Carolin Neuwirth; Pasquale Mosesso; Gaetano Pepe; Mario Fiore; Mike Malfatti; Ken Turteltaub; Wolfgang Dekant; Angela Mally
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 5.914

Review 6.  Comet assay: a versatile but complex tool in genotoxicity testing.

Authors:  Eugenia Cordelli; Margherita Bignami; Francesca Pacchierotti
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.524

7.  Toxicogenomic assessment of liver responses following subchronic exposure to furan in Fischer F344 rats.

Authors:  Hongyan Dong; Santokh Gill; Ivan H Curran; Andrew Williams; Byron Kuo; Michael G Wade; Carole L Yauk
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 8.  Exposure assessment of process-related contaminants in food by biomarker monitoring.

Authors:  Ivonne M C M Rietjens; P Dussort; Helmut Günther; Paul Hanlon; Hiroshi Honda; Angela Mally; Sue O'Hagan; Gabriele Scholz; Albrecht Seidel; James Swenberg; Justin Teeguarden; Gerhard Eisenbrand
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 5.153

9.  Mechanistic roles of microRNAs in hepatocarcinogenesis: A study of thioacetamide with multiple doses and time-points of rats.

Authors:  Harsh Dweep; Yuji Morikawa; Binsheng Gong; Jian Yan; Zhichao Liu; Tao Chen; Halil Bisgin; Wen Zou; Huixiao Hong; Tieliu Shi; Ping Gong; Christina Castro; Takeki Uehara; Yuping Wang; Weida Tong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Application of the TGx-28.65 transcriptomic biomarker to classify genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals in human TK6 cells in the presence of rat liver S9.

Authors:  Carole L Yauk; Julie K Buick; Andrew Williams; Carol D Swartz; Leslie Recio; Heng-Hong Li; Albert J Fornace; Errol M Thomson; Jiri Aubrecht
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 3.216

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.