INTRODUCTION: After a cholecystectomy, the current and traditional practice is to send each resected gallbladder to the pathologist for analysis. Some reports have suggested the possibility of selecting only those gallbladders that need to be analysed. The purpose of this study was to show a simple method for selecting which gallbladders should be sent to the pathologist. METHODS: A prospective comparative study was carried out. Two 'tests' were performed in 150 patients to detect or rule out gallbladder cancer. The first test included the patient's variables and a macroscopic gallbladder analysis performed by the surgeon (MGAS). The second test was the analysis performed by the pathologist. The results were compared. RESULTS: Of the 150 patients, 132 were women and 18 men; 130 were under 60 years old. One patient had inflammatory bowel disease, seven had changes on ultrasonography and in four cases intra-operative disturbances were observed. During the MGAS, disturbances were found in 30 patients. Eighty-one cases (54%) had at least one or more risk factors for gallbladder cancer.
INTRODUCTION: After a cholecystectomy, the current and traditional practice is to send each resected gallbladder to the pathologist for analysis. Some reports have suggested the possibility of selecting only those gallbladders that need to be analysed. The purpose of this study was to show a simple method for selecting which gallbladders should be sent to the pathologist. METHODS: A prospective comparative study was carried out. Two 'tests' were performed in 150 patients to detect or rule out gallbladder cancer. The first test included the patient's variables and a macroscopic gallbladder analysis performed by the surgeon (MGAS). The second test was the analysis performed by the pathologist. The results were compared. RESULTS: Of the 150 patients, 132 were women and 18 men; 130 were under 60 years old. One patient had inflammatory bowel disease, seven had changes on ultrasonography and in four cases intra-operative disturbances were observed. During the MGAS, disturbances were found in 30 patients. Eighty-one cases (54%) had at least one or more risk factors for gallbladder cancer.
Authors: Manousos M Konstadoulakis; Sasan Roayaie; Ilias P Gomatos; Daniel Labow; Maria-Isabell Fiel; Charles M Miller; Myron E Schwartz Journal: Hepatogastroenterology Date: 2010 Sep-Oct
Authors: Vivian P Bastiaenen; Bartholomeus Jga Corten; Elise Aj de Savornin Lohman; Joske de Jonge; Anne C Kraima; Hilko A Swank; Jaap Lp van Vliet; Gijs Jd van Acker; Anna Aw van Geloven; Klaas H In 't Hof; Lianne Koens; Philip R de Reuver; Charles C van Rossem; Gerrit D Slooter; Pieter J Tanis; Valeska Terpstra; Marcel Gw Dijkgraaf; Willem A Bemelman Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-12-23 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: V P Bastiaenen; J E Tuijp; S van Dieren; M G Besselink; T M van Gulik; L Koens; P J Tanis; W A Bemelman Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2020-07-08 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: Katarzyna Bartosiak; Maciej Liszka; Tomasz Drazba; Krzysztof Paśnik; Michal R Janik Journal: Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne Date: 2017-08-18 Impact factor: 1.195