Literature DB >> 22506674

Implementation of physical coordination training and cognitive behavioural training interventions at cleaning workplaces--secondary analyses of a randomised controlled trial.

Marie B Jørgensen1, Anne Faber, Tobias Jespersen, Klaus Hansen, John Ektor-Andersen, Jørgen V Hansen, Andreas Holtermann, Karen Søgaard.   

Abstract

This study evaluates the implementation of physical coordination training (PCT) and cognitive behavioural training (CBTr) interventions in a randomised controlled trial at nine cleaners' workplaces. Female cleaners (n = 294) were randomised into a PCT, a CBTr or a reference (REF) group. Both 12-week interventions were performed in groups guided by an instructor. Records were kept on intervention dose (adherence) unanticipated events at the work place (context) and quality of intervention delivery (fidelity). Participant adherence was 37% in the PCT and 49% in the CBTr interventions. Optimal implementation was reached by only 6% in PCT and 42% in the CBTr. Analysis of the barriers to successful implementation indicated that the intervention process is sensitive to unanticipated events. In order to succeed in improving the health of high-risk populations such as cleaners and to correctly interpret intervention effects, more research on implementation is needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN96241850. PRACTITIONER
SUMMARY: Both physical coordination training and cognitive behavioural training are potential effective workplace interventions among low educated job groups with high physical work demands. However, thorough consideration should be given to feasibility in the design of interventions. The optimal intervention should be tailored to closely match the implementation context and be robust and flexible to minimise susceptibility to changes in work organisation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22506674     DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2012.665946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  3 in total

1.  Does employee participation in workplace health promotion depend on the working environment? A cross-sectional study of Danish workers.

Authors:  Marie Birk Jørgensen; Ebbe Villadsen; Hermann Burr; Laura Punnett; Andreas Holtermann
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Managers' Perceptions of Factors Affecting Employees' Uptake of Workplace Health Promotion (WHP) Offers.

Authors:  Fanny Sigblad; Maria Savela; Leah Okenwa Emegwa
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-05-05

Review 3.  What is actually measured in process evaluations for worksite health promotion programs: a systematic review.

Authors:  Debbie Wierenga; Luuk H Engbers; Pepijn Van Empelen; Saskia Duijts; Vincent H Hildebrandt; Willem Van Mechelen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.295

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.