Literature DB >> 22506603

Age, gender, and arousal in recognition of negative and neutral pictures 1 year later.

Joachim Gavazzeni1, Tom Andersson, Lars Bäckman, Stefan Wiens, Håkan Fischer.   

Abstract

Compared with nonarousing stimuli, arousing stimuli enhance memory performance. The most robust effects have been reported for negative stimuli, "the negativity effect," although a number of mediating factors prevent definitive conclusions, for example, age, gender, memory task, retention period, and alternative arousal measures. To clarify whether the negativity effect is robust across age, gender, and time, we studied incidental recognition of neutral and negative pictures from the International Affective Picture System (Lang, Bradley, & Cuthbert, 1999) in healthy younger and older adults--women and men--after a 1-year retention interval. Memory performance was related to 2 arousal measures at encoding, skin conductance response (SCR), and intensity rating of unpleasantness. The results showed weaker overall memory performance for older adults compared with younger adults. The negativity effect on accuracy (d') was gender dependent and age independent. In contrast, the negativity effect on response bias (c) interacted with age, but not gender, being weaker for older adults. Despite significant differences in arousal (SCR and arousal rating) between negative and neutral pictures, the correlations between arousal measures and memory performance were weak. Controlling for age and gender, a small negative partial correlation was found between arousal ratings and accuracy. The results extend previous studies by relating long-term recognition to both age and gender as well as to arousal at encoding. 2013 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22506603     DOI: 10.1037/a0027946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  7 in total

1.  Selective effects of acute alcohol intake on the prospective and retrospective components of a prospective-memory task with emotional targets.

Authors:  Nora T Walter; Ute J Bayen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  NEVER forget: negative emotional valence enhances recapitulation.

Authors:  Holly J Bowen; Sarah M Kark; Elizabeth A Kensinger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-06

3.  Age Differences in Negative, but Not Positive, Rumination.

Authors:  Lisa Emery; Anne Sorrell; Cassidy Miles
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  Medial prefrontal and occipito-temporal activity at encoding determines enhanced recognition of threatening faces after 1.5 years.

Authors:  Xiqin Liu; Xinqi Zhou; Yixu Zeng; Jialin Li; Weihua Zhao; Lei Xu; Xiaoxiao Zheng; Meina Fu; Shuxia Yao; Carlo V Cannistraci; Keith M Kendrick; Benjamin Becker
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.270

5.  Age and information preference: Neutral information sources in decision contexts.

Authors:  Joshua L Rutt; Derek M Isaacowitz; Alexandra M Freund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Sex differences in contextual pattern separation, neurogenesis, and functional connectivity within the limbic system.

Authors:  Shunya Yagi; Amanda Lee; Nadine Truter; Liisa A M Galea
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 8.811

7.  Impact of negative emotion on the neural correlates of long-term recognition in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Grégoria Kalpouzos; Håkan Fischer; Anna Rieckmann; Stuart W S Macdonald; Lars Bäckman
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.