| Literature DB >> 22505802 |
Yili Zeng1, Qinmiao Huang, Meizhu Zheng, Jianxin Guo, Jingxin Pan.
Abstract
This study explored the effects of reactive nitrogen metabolites (RNMS) on natural-killer- (NK-) cell-mediated killing of K562 cells and the influence of RNM scavengers, such as tiopronin (TIP), glutamylcysteinylglycine (GSH), and histamine dihydrochloride (DHT), on reversing the suppressing effect of RNM. We administered exogenous and endogenous RNM in the NK + K562 culture system and then added RNM scavengers. The concentrations of RNM, TNF-β and IFN-γ, and NK-cell cytotoxicity (NCC) and the percentage of living NK cells were then examined. We found that both exogenous and endogenous RNM caused the KIR to decrease (P < 0.01); however, RNM scavengers such as TIP and GSH rescued this phenomenon dose dependently. In conclusion, our data suggests that RNM scavengers such as TIP and GSH enhance the antineoplasmic activity of NK cells.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22505802 PMCID: PMC3312280 DOI: 10.1155/2012/101737
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomed Biotechnol ISSN: 1110-7243
The effect of ONOO− on the activity of NK cell.
| Groups | NO (6 h) ( | NK (6 h) % | NK (24 h) % | TNF- | IFN- | NCC (24 h) % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 11.29 ± 5.02 | 6.63 ± 6.42 | 10.80 ± 5.05 | |||
| E | 52.90 ± 8.61 | 89.87 ± 1.93 | 87.37 ± 2.11 | 183.08 ± 7.45 | 136.32 ± 6.5 | |
| T | 25.68 ± 5.96 | 11.96 ± 5.89 | 12.02 ± 95 | |||
| E + T | 95.36 ± 6.45 | 90.57 ± 2.52 | 92.16 ± 2.53 | 198.64 ± 7.33 | 146.43 ± 6.49 | 66.32 ± 4.34 |
| E +ONOO− | 264.85 ± 9.16# | 80.41 ± 2.52# | 81.05 ± 1.58# | 86.07 ± 7.51# | 58.46 ± 6.12# | |
| T + ONOO− | 228.35 ± 8.45* | 11.07 ± 5.52 | 12.10 ± 5.02 | |||
| E + T + ONOO− | 261.03 ± 6.57∆ | 80.97 ± 1.677∆ | 73.87 ± 1.021∆ | 91.68 ± 6.00∆ | 58.47 ± 6.99∆ | 43.84 ± 3.42∆ |
n = 3; T is K562 cells, E is mononuclear enriching NK cells E/T = 10/1; #P < 0.05, comparison between group E + ONOO− and group E; *P < 0.05, comparison between group T + ONOO− and group T; ∆P < 0.05 comparison between group E + T + ONOO− and group E + T.
The effect of RNM scavengers on NK-cell cytotoxicity of ONOO−.
| Groups | NO (6 h) ( | NK (6 h) % | NK (24 h) % | TNF- | IFN- | NCC (24 h)% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E + T | 95.36 ± 6.45 | 90.57 ± 2.52 | 93.17 ± 2.57 | 198.64 ± 7.33 | 146.43 ± 6.49 | 67.47 ± 2.64 |
| E + T + ONOO− | 261.03 ± 6.57 | 80.97 ± 1.68 | 71.87 ± 1.02 | 91.68 ± 6.00 | 58.47±70 | 43.44 ± 2.87 |
| E + T + DHC + ONOO− | 255.32 ± 11.93 | 82.27 ± 1.38 | 73.60 ± 2.76 | 118.73 ± 5.56* | 70.40 ± 7.15* | 45.26 ± 3.31 |
| E + T + TIP + ONOO− | 179.65 ± 7.00* | 90.07 ± 1.23* | 91.13 ± 3.67* | 131.03 ± 5.46* | 76.80 ± 4.91* | 61.58 ± 1.89* |
| E + T + GSH + ONOO− | 185.69 ± 5.02* | 89.87+0.35* | 88.03 ± 1.46* | 128.70 ± 4.53* | 75.12 ± 6.45* | 60.68 ± 2.07* |
n = 3; 2. ONOO− 200 umol/L; DHC 20 umol/L, TIP 50 umol/L, GSH 50 umol/L; T is K562 cells, E is mononuclear enriching NK cells E/T = 10/1; *P < 0.05, compared with E + T + ONOO−.
The effect of endogenous RNM on the activity of NK cells.
| Groups | NO (6 h) ( | TNF- | IFN- | NCC (24 h) % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 11.68 ± 6.62 | 11.08 ± 5.46 | 11.65 ± 5.05 | |
| T + IL-2/PHA | 22.29 ± 5.66 | 20.64 ± 5.57 | 13.18 ± 5.86 | |
| MO + IL-2/PHA | 114.37 ± 7.40 | 40.64 + 7.59 | 47.76 ± 6.57 | |
| E + IL-2/PHA | 62.64 ± 7.00 | 361.62 ± 12.27 | 284.74 ± 7.49 | |
| E + MO + IL-2/PHA | 119.62 ± 11.18 | 114.09 ± 7.46 | 76.77 ± 4.99 | |
| MO + T + IL-2/PHA | 115.26 ± 6.47 | 33.31 ± 6.34 | 46.46 ± 6.97 | |
| E + T + IL-2/PHA | 79.63 ± 7.04 | 371.99 ± 12.79 | 275.08 ± 9.61 | 91.77 ± 3.62 |
| E + T + MO + IL-2/PHA | 189.35 ± 6.51* | 110.91 ± 10.01* | 74.74 ± 10.15* | 60.39 ± 5.39* |
n = 3; ONOO− 200 umol/L; DHT 20 umol/L, TIP 50 umol/L, GSH 50 umol/L; T is K562 cells, E is mononuclear enriching NK cells E/T = 10/1; *P < 0.05, comparison between group NK + MO + K562 + IL-2 and group NK + K562 + IL-2.
The effect of RNM scavengers on NK-cell-mediated killing of K562 cells.
| Groups |
| NO (6 h) ( | TNF- | IFN- | NCC% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL-2/PHA + E + T | 74.41 ± 3.05 | 82.10 ± 6.60 | 381.47 ± 10.64 | 277.14 ± 10.61 | 90.64 ± 3.06 |
| IL-2/PHA + E + T + MO | 256.08 ± 8.52 | 193.65 ± 5.95 | 114.39 ± 7.45 | 76.81 ± 9.50 | 61.29 ± 2.22 |
| IL-2/PHA + E + T + MO + DHC | 101.37 ± 5.56* | 188.92 ± 5.00 | 134.10 ± 6.68* | 107.89 ± 6.55* | 72.20 ± 4.10* |
| IL-2/PHA + E + T + MO + TIP | 107.02 ± 6.39* | 91.32 ± 6.81* | 185.00 ± 4.51* | 146.71 ± 6.96* | 84.31 ± 4.56* |
| IL-2/PHA + E + T + MO + GSH | 108.69 ± 6.05* | 84.66 ± 5.99* | 181.91 ± 5.92* | 144.11 ± 6.03* | 81.65 ± 3.09* |
n = 3; ONOO− 200 umol/L; DHT 20 umol/L, TIP 50 umol/L, GSH 50 umol/L; T is K562 cells, E is mononuclear enriching NK cells E/T = 10/1; *P < 0.05, compared with IL-2/PHA + NK + K562 + MO.
Figure 1The effect of different dosages of RNM scavengers on the activity of NK cells. With an increase of the dosage, the groups treated with TIP and GSH decreased the production of RNM and increased the levels of TNF-γ, IFN-β and NCC significantly (P < 0.05). However, each group of DHT could not eliminate RNM (P > 0.05).
Figure 2The effect of different combinations of RNM scavengers on the activity of NK cells. Different combinations of RNM scavengers did not enhance the antineoplasmic activity of NK cells.