Literature DB >> 22505684

Differential effects of DNA supercoiling on Chlamydia early promoters correlate with expression patterns in midcycle.

Eric Cheng1, Ming Tan.   

Abstract

Changes in DNA supercoiling levels during the chlamydial developmental cycle have been proposed as a global mechanism to upregulate midcycle genes, but the effects on early genes are not known. We examined the promoters for 10 Chlamydia trachomatis early genes and found that they could be separated into two subsets based on their responses to DNA supercoiling in vitro. Furthermore, the type of supercoiling response correlated with the in vivo expression pattern for each early gene. One subset of seven early genes had promoters that were transcribed in a supercoiling-insensitive manner over the physiologic range of supercoiling levels that have been measured in Chlamydia. In vivo transcripts for these genes were detected at similar levels during early-stage and midstage times. In contrast, a second subset, represented in our study by three early genes, had supercoiling-dependent promoters that were transcribed at higher levels from more-supercoiled templates, which is the response observed for midcycle genes. Genes in this subset were expressed at higher levels at midstage times than at early times in vivo. We propose that this second subset represents a novel class of chlamydial developmental genes with features of both early and midcycle genes. We hypothesize that expression of these supercoiling-dependent early genes is upregulated by increased chlamydial supercoiling levels in midcycle via their supercoiling-responsive promoters in a manner similar to that for midcycle genes. Thus, we propose that DNA supercoiling is utilized in Chlamydia as a general mechanism to regulate genes in the midstage of the developmental cycle and not just midcycle genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22505684      PMCID: PMC3370871          DOI: 10.1128/JB.00242-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  37 in total

Review 1.  DNA topology-mediated control of global gene expression in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  G Wesley Hatfield; Craig J Benham
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2002-06-11       Impact factor: 16.830

2.  Sigma28 RNA polymerase regulates hctB, a late developmental gene in Chlamydia.

Authors:  Hilda Hiu Yin Yu; Ming Tan
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.501

3.  Gene expression changes triggered by exposure of Haemophilus influenzae to novobiocin or ciprofloxacin: combined transcription and translation analysis.

Authors:  H Gmuender; K Kuratli; C P Gray; W Keck; S Evers
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  The early gene product EUO is a transcriptional repressor that selectively regulates promoters of Chlamydia late genes.

Authors:  Christopher J Rosario; Ming Tan
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 3.501

5.  Development of a quantitative gene expression assay for Chlamydia trachomatis identified temporal expression of sigma factors.

Authors:  S A Mathews; K M Volp; P Timms
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1999-09-24       Impact factor: 4.124

6.  Three temporal classes of gene expression during the Chlamydia trachomatis developmental cycle.

Authors:  E I Shaw; C A Dooley; E R Fischer; M A Scidmore; K A Fields; T Hackstadt
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.501

7.  Functional analysis of the heat shock regulator HrcA of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  Adam C Wilson; Ming Tan
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Chlamydial histone-DNA interactions are disrupted by a metabolite in the methylerythritol phosphate pathway of isoprenoid biosynthesis.

Authors:  Nicole A Grieshaber; Elizabeth R Fischer; David J Mead; Cheryl A Dooley; Ted Hackstadt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-05-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Mutational analysis of the Chlamydia trachomatis dnaK promoter defines the optimal -35 promoter element.

Authors:  Chris S Schaumburg; Ming Tan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Genomic transcriptional profiling of the developmental cycle of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  Robert J Belland; Guangming Zhong; Deborah D Crane; Daniel Hogan; Daniel Sturdevant; Jyotika Sharma; Wandy L Beatty; Harlan D Caldwell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-06-18       Impact factor: 12.779

View more
  5 in total

1.  Regulation of Chlamydia Gene Expression by Tandem Promoters with Different Temporal Patterns.

Authors:  Christopher J Rosario; Ming Tan
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Functional analysis of three topoisomerases that regulate DNA supercoiling levels in Chlamydia.

Authors:  Emilie Orillard; Ming Tan
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 3.501

3.  Identification of new DNA-associated proteins from Waddlia chondrophila.

Authors:  Marie de Barsy; Lucas Herrgott; Virginie Martin; Trestan Pillonel; Patrick H Viollier; Gilbert Greub
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Sigma 54-Regulated Transcription Is Associated with Membrane Reorganization and Type III Secretion Effectors during Conversion to Infectious Forms of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  Katelyn R Soules; Scott D LaBrie; Benjamin H May; P Scott Hefty
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 7.867

5.  Quantifying promoter activity during the developmental cycle of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  Yanguang Cong; Leiqiong Gao; Yan Zhang; Yuqi Xian; Ziyu Hua; Hiba Elaasar; Li Shen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.