| Literature DB >> 22505631 |
Marianne J U Novak1, Jason D Warren, Susie M D Henley, Bogdan Draganski, Richard S Frackowiak, Sarah J Tabrizi.
Abstract
Huntington's disease is an inherited neurodegenerative disease that causes motor, cognitive and psychiatric impairment, including an early decline in ability to recognize emotional states in others. The pathophysiology underlying the earliest manifestations of the disease is not fully understood; the objective of our study was to clarify this. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate changes in brain mechanisms of emotion recognition in pre-manifest carriers of the abnormal Huntington's disease gene (subjects with pre-manifest Huntington's disease): 16 subjects with pre-manifest Huntington's disease and 14 control subjects underwent 1.5 tesla magnetic resonance scanning while viewing pictures of facial expressions from the Ekman and Friesen series. Disgust, anger and happiness were chosen as emotions of interest. Disgust is the emotion in which recognition deficits have most commonly been detected in Huntington's disease; anger is the emotion in which impaired recognition was detected in the largest behavioural study of emotion recognition in pre-manifest Huntington's disease to date; and happiness is a positive emotion to contrast with disgust and anger. Ekman facial expressions were also used to quantify emotion recognition accuracy outside the scanner and structural magnetic resonance imaging with voxel-based morphometry was used to assess the relationship between emotion recognition accuracy and regional grey matter volume. Emotion processing in pre-manifest Huntington's disease was associated with reduced neural activity for all three emotions in partially separable functional networks. Furthermore, the Huntington's disease-associated modulation of disgust and happiness processing was negatively correlated with genetic markers of pre-manifest disease progression in distributed, largely extrastriatal networks. The modulated disgust network included insulae, cingulate cortices, pre- and postcentral gyri, precunei, cunei, bilateral putamena, right pallidum, right thalamus, cerebellum, middle frontal, middle occipital, right superior and left inferior temporal gyri, and left superior parietal lobule. The modulated happiness network included postcentral gyri, left caudate, right cingulate cortex, right superior and inferior parietal lobules, and right superior frontal, middle temporal, middle occipital and precentral gyri. These effects were not driven merely by striatal dysfunction. We did not find equivalent associations between brain structure and emotion recognition, and the pre-manifest Huntington's disease cohort did not have a behavioural deficit in out-of-scanner emotion recognition relative to controls. In addition, we found increased neural activity in the pre-manifest subjects in response to all three emotions in frontal regions, predominantly in the middle frontal gyri. Overall, these findings suggest that pathophysiological effects of Huntington's disease may precede the development of overt clinical symptoms and detectable cerebral atrophy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22505631 PMCID: PMC3326253 DOI: 10.1093/brain/aws024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain ISSN: 0006-8950 Impact factor: 13.501
Clinical and neuropsychological characteristics of subjects
| Ekman 60 faces test | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | CAG repeat length | Probability of manifest disease onset within 5 years | National Adult Reading Test | Years of full time education | Unified Huntington's disease Rating Scale motor score | Stroop colour | Stroop word | Stroop interference | Symbol -digit modalities test | Category fluency | Verbal fluency | Benton facial recognition score | Anger | Disgust | Happiness | |
| 43.81 (8.30) | 42 (1.89) | 0.26 (0.16) | 36.13 (6.69) | 15.88 (3.46) | 4.93 (6.57) | 88.36 (27.00) | 108.57 (18.10) | 50.07 (14.94) | 58.07 (14.74) | 30.2 (19.52) | 16.36 (4.62) | 40.27 (13.54) | 8.19 (1.68) | 7.69 (1.89) | 9.88 (0.34) | |
| 39.43 (11.40) | n/a | n/a | 35.07 (8.56) | 15.86 (3.23) | 0.31 (0.63) | 83.14 (11.98) | 106.5 (14.75) | 51 (11.56) | 63.93 (11.90) | 27.54 (5.16) | 14.79 (2.89) | 47.57 (4.31) | 8.79 (1.12) | 7.71 (2.16) | 10 (0) | |
| 0.23* | n/a | 0.71* | 0.99* | 0.02** | 0.51* | 0.74* | 0.86* | 0.26* | 0.64* | 0.28* | 0.06* | 0.27* | 0.97* | 0.18* | ||
aHomogeneity of variance tested with Levene's test (P < 0.05).
Fisher's exact test showed no difference in gender distribution between the groups (P = 0.574).
Details of functional MRI models
| Model number | Subject groups | Covariates |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Control and pre-manifest Huntington's disease | None |
| 2 | Control and pre-manifest Huntington's disease | CAG repeat length or probability of manifest disease onset within 5 years |
| 3 | Pre-manifest Huntington's disease only | CAG repeat length or probability of manifest disease onset within 5 years, age, gender |
| 4 | Pre-manifest Huntington's disease only | Disgust only: mean striatal BOLD signal, age, gender |
| 5 | Control and pre-manifest Huntington's disease | Ekman 60 out-of-scanner score |
Functional MRI results
| Emotion and model number | Model description | Set level | Number of clusters | Basal ganglia | Frontal lobe | Parietal lobe | Temporal lobe | Occipital lobe | Cingulate cortex | Cerebellum and pons | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| caudate | putamen | pallidum | thalamus | superior frontal gyrus | middle frontal gyrus | inferior frontal gyrus | precentral gyrus | paracentral lobule | postcentral gyrus | superior parietal lobule | inferior parietal lobule | precuneus | anterior insula | mid-insula | posterior insula | operculum | hippocampus | parahippocampal gyrus | superior temporal gyrus | middle temp gyrus | inferior temporal gyrus | lingual gyrus | cuneus | superior occipital gyrus | middle occipital gyrus | inferior occipital gyrus | anterior | middle | posterior | isthmus | anterior lobe of cerebellum | posterior lobe of cerebellum | pons | |||||
| Disgust; model 2 | Control > HD (with CAG adjustment) | <1×10-10 | 9 | L | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Happiness; model 2 | Control > HD (with CAG adjustment) | <1x10-10 | 11 | L | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Anger; model 2 | Control > HD (with CAG adjustment) | <1x10-10 | 9 | L | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Disgust; model 2 | HD > Control (with CAG adjustment) | 4.4x10-5 | 3 | L | ✓ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Anger; model 2 | HD > Control (with CAG adjustment) | <1x10-10 | 6 | L | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Disgust; model 3 | HD only, negative correlation with CAG | <1x10-10 | 21 | L | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Happiness; model 3 | HD only, negative correlation with CAG | <1x10-10 | 7 | L | ✓ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Disgust; model 3 | HD only, positive correlation with CAG | 3.4x10-4 | 2 | L | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | ✓ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Happiness; model 3 | HD only, positive correlation with CAG | <1x10-10 | 11 | L | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Anger; model 3 | HD only, positive correlation with CAG | <1x10-10 | 7 | L | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Disgust; model 3 | HD only, negative correlation with PDO | <1x10-10 | 19 | L | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Happiness; model 3 | HD only, negative correlation with PDO | <1x10-10 | 9 | L | ✓ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Happiness; model 3 | HD only, positive correlation with PDO | <1x10-10 | 6 | L | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Anger; model 3 | HD only, positive correlation with PDO | <1x10-10 | 6 | L | ✓ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Disgust; model 4 | HD only, voxels in which BOLD signal was correlated with mean striatal BOLD signal (voxels with negative correlation between BOLD signal and CAG only) | <1x10-10 | 21 | L | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Figure 1Statistical parametric maps showing the regions in which BOLD signal is lower in subjects with pre-manifest Huntington’s disease than in controls after controlling for CAG repeat length in the following conditions: (A) disgust > neutral; (B) anger > neutral; and (C) happiness > neutral. P = posterior; A = anterior; L = left; R = right.
Figure 2Statistical parametric maps showing the negative correlations between pre-manifest HD levels of BOLD in the disgust > neutral condition and: (A) CAG repeat length and (B) probability of manifest disease onset within five years. (C) shows the two sets of negative correlations on the same image: negative correlations with CAG repeat length are shown in yellow and negative correlations with probability of manifest disease onset within five years are shown in blue. Overlapping regions are shown in green. P = posterior; A = anterior; L = left; R = right.
Figure 3Plots of the normalized mean BOLD signal for each subject in the disgust > neutral contrast against CAG repeat length repeat length (left) and probability of disease onset in 5 years (right). Black circles represent subjects with pre-manifest Huntington's disease and white diamonds represent controls. Controls are plotted against a CAG repeat length repeat length of 18 based on a previous study showing a mean CAG repeat length repeat length of 18 in 360 controls (Snell ), and a probability of manifest disease onset within 5 years of 0. PDO = probability of disease onset within 5 years.