Literature DB >> 22505590

Spatial and temporal variability in response to hybrid electro-optical stimulation.

Austin R Duke1, Hui Lu, Michael W Jenkins, Hillel J Chiel, E Duco Jansen.   

Abstract

Hybrid electro-optical neural stimulation is a novel paradigm combining the advantages of optical and electrical stimulation techniques while reducing their respective limitations. However, in order to fulfill its promise, this technique requires reduced variability and improved reproducibility. Here we used a comparative physiological approach to aid the further development of this technique by identifying the spatial and temporal factors characteristic of hybrid stimulation that may contribute to experimental variability and/or a lack of reproducibility. Using transient pulses of infrared light delivered simultaneously with a bipolar electrical stimulus in either the marine mollusk Aplysia californica buccal nerve or the rat sciatic nerve, we determined the existence of a finite region of excitability with size altered by the strength of the optical stimulus and recruitment dictated by the polarity of the electrical stimulus. Hybrid stimulation radiant exposures yielding 50% probability of firing (RE₅₀) were shown to be negatively correlated with the underlying changes in electrical stimulation threshold over time. In Aplysia, but not in the rat sciatic nerve, increasing optical radiant exposures (J cm⁻²) beyond the RE₅₀ ultimately resulted in inhibition of evoked potentials. Accounting for the sources of variability identified in this study increased the reproducibility of stimulation from 35% to 93% in Aplysia and 23% to 76% in the rat with reduced variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22505590     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/9/3/036003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  29 in total

1.  Alternating current and infrared produce an onset-free reversible nerve block.

Authors:  Emilie H Lothet; Kevin L Kilgore; Niloy Bhadra; Narendra Bhadra; Tina Vrabec; Yves T Wang; E Duco Jansen; Michael W Jenkins; Hillel J Chiel
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 3.593

2.  Infrared neural stimulation of primary visual cortex in non-human primates.

Authors:  Jonathan M Cayce; Robert M Friedman; Gang Chen; E Duco Jansen; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen; Anna W Roe
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  A review of optical pacing with infrared light.

Authors:  S M Ford; M Watanabe; M W Jenkins
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Efferent Inputs Are Required for Normal Function of Vestibular Nerve Afferents.

Authors:  Vishal Raghu; Richard Salvi; Soroush G Sadeghi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Ryanodine and IP3 receptor-mediated calcium signaling play a pivotal role in neurological infrared laser modulation.

Authors:  Gleb P Tolstykh; Cory A Olsovsky; Bennett L Ibey; Hope T Beier
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.593

6.  Model study of combined electrical and near-infrared neural stimulation on the bullfrog sciatic nerve.

Authors:  Mengxian You; Zongxia Mou
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  Polydimethylsiloxane-based optical waveguides for tetherless powering of floating microstimulators.

Authors:  Ali Ersen; Mesut Sahin
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 3.170

8.  Optical pacing of the adult rabbit heart.

Authors:  Michael W Jenkins; Y T Wang; Y Q Doughman; M Watanabe; Y Cheng; A M Rollins
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  Infrared neural stimulation of human spinal nerve roots in vivo.

Authors:  Jonathan M Cayce; Jonathon D Wells; Jonathan D Malphrus; Chris Kao; Sharon Thomsen; Noel B Tulipan; Peter E Konrad; E Duco Jansen; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.593

Review 10.  Novel methods for mapping the cavernous nerves during radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Nathaniel M Fried; Arthur L Burnett
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.