OBJECTIVE: Juvenile localized scleroderma (LS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder associated with substantial morbidity and disability. Although a wide range of therapeutic strategies has been reported in the literature, a lack of agreement on treatment specifics and accepted methods for clinical assessment has made it difficult to compare approaches and identify optimal therapy. Our objective was to develop standardized treatment plans, clinical assessments, and response criteria for active, moderate to high severity juvenile LS. METHODS: A core group of pediatric rheumatologists, dermatologists, and a lay advisor was engaged by the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) to develop standardized treatment plans and assessment parameters for juvenile LS using consensus methods/nominal group techniques. Recommendations were validated in 2 face-to-face conferences with a larger group of practitioners with expertise in juvenile LS and with the full membership of CARRA, which encompasses the majority of pediatric rheumatologists in the US and Canada. RESULTS: Consensus was achieved on standardized treatment plans that reflect the prevailing treatment practices of CARRA members. Standardized clinical assessment methods and provisional treatment response criteria were also developed. Greater than 90% of pediatric rheumatologists responding to a survey (66% of CARRA membership) affirmed the final recommendations and agreed to utilize these consensus plans to treat patients with juvenile LS. CONCLUSION: Using consensus methodology, we have developed standardized treatment plans and assessment methods for juvenile LS. The high level of support among pediatric rheumatologists will support future comparative effectiveness studies and enable the development of evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of juvenile LS.
OBJECTIVE:Juvenile localized scleroderma (LS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder associated with substantial morbidity and disability. Although a wide range of therapeutic strategies has been reported in the literature, a lack of agreement on treatment specifics and accepted methods for clinical assessment has made it difficult to compare approaches and identify optimal therapy. Our objective was to develop standardized treatment plans, clinical assessments, and response criteria for active, moderate to high severity juvenile LS. METHODS: A core group of pediatric rheumatologists, dermatologists, and a lay advisor was engaged by the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) to develop standardized treatment plans and assessment parameters for juvenile LS using consensus methods/nominal group techniques. Recommendations were validated in 2 face-to-face conferences with a larger group of practitioners with expertise in juvenile LS and with the full membership of CARRA, which encompasses the majority of pediatric rheumatologists in the US and Canada. RESULTS: Consensus was achieved on standardized treatment plans that reflect the prevailing treatment practices of CARRA members. Standardized clinical assessment methods and provisional treatment response criteria were also developed. Greater than 90% of pediatric rheumatologists responding to a survey (66% of CARRA membership) affirmed the final recommendations and agreed to utilize these consensus plans to treat patients with juvenile LS. CONCLUSION: Using consensus methodology, we have developed standardized treatment plans and assessment methods for juvenile LS. The high level of support among pediatric rheumatologists will support future comparative effectiveness studies and enable the development of evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of juvenile LS.
Authors: Alexander Kreuter; Thilo Gambichler; Frank Breuckmann; Sebastian Rotterdam; Marcus Freitag; Markus Stuecker; Klaus Hoffmann; Peter Altmeyer Journal: Arch Dermatol Date: 2005-07
Authors: P Clements; P Lachenbruch; J Siebold; B White; S Weiner; R Martin; A Weinstein; M Weisman; M Mayes; D Collier Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 1995-07 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Han Jie Soh; Courtney Samuel; Victoria Heaton; William Douglas Renton; Angela Cox; Jane Munro Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Tamás Constantin; Ivan Foeldvari; Clare E Pain; Annamária Pálinkás; Peter Höger; Monika Moll; Dana Nemkova; Lisa Weibel; Melinda Laczkovszki; Philip Clements; Kathryn S Torok Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2018-05-04 Impact factor: 3.183
Authors: Peter A Nigrovic; Timothy Beukelman; George Tomlinson; Brian M Feldman; Laura E Schanberg; Yukiko Kimura Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Anagha Bangalore Kumar; Elizabeth K Blixt; Lisa A Drage; Rokea A El-Azhary; David A Wetter Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2019-01-29 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Yongdong Zhao; Eveline Y Wu; Melissa S Oliver; Ashley M Cooper; Matthew L Basiaga; Sheetal S Vora; Tzielan C Lee; Emily Fox; Gil Amarilyo; Sara M Stern; Jeffrey A Dvergsten; Kathleen A Haines; Kelly A Rouster-Stevens; Karen B Onel; Julie Cherian; Jonathan S Hausmann; Paivi Miettunen; Tania Cellucci; Farzana Nuruzzaman; Angela Taneja; Karyl S Barron; Matthew C Hollander; Sivia K Lapidus; Suzanne C Li; Seza Ozen; Hermann Girschick; Ronald M Laxer; Fatma Dedeoglu; Christian M Hedrich; Polly J Ferguson Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2018-07-12 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Kathryn S Torok; Katherine Kurzinski; Christina Kelsey; Jonathan Yabes; Kelsey Magee; Abbe N Vallejo; Thomas Medsger; Carol A Feghali-Bostwick Journal: Semin Arthritis Rheum Date: 2015-06-17 Impact factor: 5.532