OBJECTIVES: To compare bicarbonate kinetics and acid base status in HD and HDF for the same patient; and to investigate the effect of patient physiologic parameters on these kinetics. METHODS: In order to monitor HCO3- kinetics during dialysis, acid-base parameters, pH, blood gases partial pressures, and HCO3- concentrations were recorded during 3 regular dialysis (HD) and 3 on-line post-dilution HDF sessions performed on 12 patients, using same dialysis fluid with a 38 mmol/l HCO3- concentration. HCO3- mass transfers through the hemodialyzers membranes and into the patients were continuously calculated during the sessions from HCO3- concentrations, together with HCO3-dialysance. The"apparent" HCO3-gain was calculated by integrating over time the instantaneous mass transfer from dialyzer and re-infusion fluid to the patient. A second method consisted in calculating the patient apparent bicarbonate space (ABS) and HCO3- mass (ABS times plasma concentration) at beginning and end of session. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between acid base parameters at the end of HD and HDF sessions. In contrast to urea clearances, HCO3- dialysances decayed with time during sessions from 110 to 140 ml/min to about 40 ml/min after one hour. The net HCO3- gain was taken as the difference between final and initial HCO3-masses. This net gain was in average 63% of apparent gain in HD and 74% in HDF. CONCLUSIONS: Uremic acidosis was well corrected without risk of alkalosis. An unexpected result was the continuous decay of bicarbonate dialysance both in HD and HDF during runs.
OBJECTIVES: To compare bicarbonate kinetics and acid base status in HD and HDF for the same patient; and to investigate the effect of patient physiologic parameters on these kinetics. METHODS: In order to monitor HCO3- kinetics during dialysis, acid-base parameters, pH, blood gases partial pressures, and HCO3- concentrations were recorded during 3 regular dialysis (HD) and 3 on-line post-dilution HDF sessions performed on 12 patients, using same dialysis fluid with a 38 mmol/l HCO3- concentration. HCO3- mass transfers through the hemodialyzers membranes and into the patients were continuously calculated during the sessions from HCO3- concentrations, together with HCO3-dialysance. The"apparent" HCO3-gain was calculated by integrating over time the instantaneous mass transfer from dialyzer and re-infusion fluid to the patient. A second method consisted in calculating the patient apparent bicarbonate space (ABS) and HCO3- mass (ABS times plasma concentration) at beginning and end of session. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between acid base parameters at the end of HD and HDF sessions. In contrast to urea clearances, HCO3- dialysances decayed with time during sessions from 110 to 140 ml/min to about 40 ml/min after one hour. The net HCO3- gain was taken as the difference between final and initial HCO3-masses. This net gain was in average 63% of apparent gain in HD and 74% in HDF. CONCLUSIONS:Uremic acidosis was well corrected without risk of alkalosis. An unexpected result was the continuous decay of bicarbonate dialysance both in HD and HDF during runs.
Authors: William B Smith; Sandy Gibson; George E Newman; Kendra S Hendon; Margarita Askelson; James Zhao; Jamil Hantash; Brigid Flanagan; John W Larkin; Len A Usvyat; Ravi I Thadhani; Franklin W Maddux Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 2.388