UNLABELLED: The prevalence of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among incarcerated individuals in the United States is estimated to be between 12% and 31%. HCV treatment during incarceration is an attractive option because of improved access to health care and directly observed therapy. We compared incarcerated and nonincarcerated HCV-infected patients evaluated for treatment at a single academic center between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2007. During this period, 521 nonincarcerated and 388 incarcerated patients were evaluated for HCV treatment. Three hundred and nineteen (61.2%) nonincarcerated patients and 234 (60.3%) incarcerated patients underwent treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin. Incarcerated patients were more likely to be male, African-American race, and have a history of alcohol or intravenous drug use. Treated incarcerated patients were less likely to have genotype 1 virus and were less likely to have undergone previous treatment. There was a similar prevalence of coinfection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in both groups. A sustained viral response (SVR) was achieved in 97 (42.9%) incarcerated patients, compared to 115 (38.0%) nonincarcerated patients (P = 0.304). Both groups had a similar proportion of patients that completed a full treatment course. Stepwise logistic regression was conducted, and the final model included full treatment course, non-genotype 1 virus, younger age at treatment start, and negative HIV status. Incarceration status was not a significant predictor when added to this model (P = 0.075). CONCLUSION: In a cohort of HCV-infected patients managed in an academic medical center ambulatory clinic, incarcerated patients were as likely to be treated for HCV and as likely to achieve an SVR as nonincarcerated patients.
UNLABELLED: The prevalence of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among incarcerated individuals in the United States is estimated to be between 12% and 31%. HCV treatment during incarceration is an attractive option because of improved access to health care and directly observed therapy. We compared incarcerated and nonincarcerated HCV-infectedpatients evaluated for treatment at a single academic center between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2007. During this period, 521 nonincarcerated and 388 incarcerated patients were evaluated for HCV treatment. Three hundred and nineteen (61.2%) nonincarcerated patients and 234 (60.3%) incarcerated patients underwent treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin. Incarcerated patients were more likely to be male, African-American race, and have a history of alcohol or intravenous drug use. Treated incarcerated patients were less likely to have genotype 1 virus and were less likely to have undergone previous treatment. There was a similar prevalence of coinfection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in both groups. A sustained viral response (SVR) was achieved in 97 (42.9%) incarcerated patients, compared to 115 (38.0%) nonincarcerated patients (P = 0.304). Both groups had a similar proportion of patients that completed a full treatment course. Stepwise logistic regression was conducted, and the final model included full treatment course, non-genotype 1 virus, younger age at treatment start, and negative HIV status. Incarceration status was not a significant predictor when added to this model (P = 0.075). CONCLUSION: In a cohort of HCV-infectedpatients managed in an academic medical center ambulatory clinic, incarcerated patients were as likely to be treated for HCV and as likely to achieve an SVR as nonincarcerated patients.
Authors: Anne C Spaulding; Cindy M Weinbaum; Daryl T-Y Lau; Richard Sterling; Leonard B Seeff; Harold S Margolis; Jay H Hoofnagle Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2006-05-16 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Gregory L Armstrong; Annemarie Wasley; Edgar P Simard; Geraldine M McQuillan; Wendi L Kuhnert; Miriam J Alter Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2006-05-16 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Jacques Baillargeon; Ingrid A Binswanger; Joseph V Penn; Brie A Williams; Owen J Murray Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2008-12-01 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: John G McHutchison; Gregory T Everson; Stuart C Gordon; Ira M Jacobson; Mark Sulkowski; Robert Kauffman; Lindsay McNair; John Alam; Andrew J Muir Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-04-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Richard K Sterling; Charlotte M Hofmann; Velimir A Luketic; Arun J Sanyal; Melissa J Contos; A Scott Mills; Mitchell L Shiffman Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: E J Aspinall; W Mitchell; J Schofield; A Cairns; S Lamond; P Bramley; S E Peters; H Valerio; J Tomnay; D J Goldberg; P R Mills; S T Barclay; A Fraser; J F Dillon; N K Martin; M Hickman; S J Hutchinson Journal: J Viral Hepat Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 3.728
Authors: Andrés Marco; José J Antón; Joan Trujols; Pablo Saíz de la Hoya; José de Juan; Inmaculada Faraco; Joan A Caylà Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2015-08-19 Impact factor: 3.090