Literature DB >> 22504608

Towards more robust estimates of the transmissibility of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Christian L Althaus1, Janneke C M Heijne, Nicola Low.   

Abstract

There is a lack of a common concept on how to estimate transmissibility of Chlamydia trachomatis from cross-sectional sexual partnership studies. Using a mathematical model that takes into account the dynamics of chlamydia transmission and sexual partnership formation, we report refined estimates of chlamydia transmissibility in heterosexual partnerships.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22504608     DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318248a550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Dis        ISSN: 0148-5717            Impact factor:   2.830


  14 in total

Review 1.  Mycoplasma genitalium Infection in Men.

Authors:  Patrick J Horner; David H Martin
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 5.226

2.  Genotype-Specific Concordance of Chlamydia trachomatis Genital Infection Within Heterosexual Partnerships.

Authors:  Julia A Schillinger; Barry P Katz; Lauri E Markowitz; Phillip G Braslins; Lydia A Shrier; Guillermo Madico; Barbara Van Der Pol; Donald P Orr; Peter A Rice; Byron E Batteiger
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  The cost-effectiveness of screening men who have sex with men for rectal chlamydial and gonococcal infection to prevent HIV Infection.

Authors:  Harrell W Chesson; Kyle T Bernstein; Thomas L Gift; Julia L Marcus; Sharon Pipkin; Charlotte K Kent
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  Per-partnership transmission probabilities for Chlamydia trachomatis infection: evidence synthesis of population-based survey data.

Authors:  Joanna Lewis; Peter J White; Malcolm J Price
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Chlamydia trachomatis load in population-based screening and STI-clinics: implications for screening policy.

Authors:  Jeanne A M C Dirks; Petra F G Wolffs; Nicole H T M Dukers-Muijrers; Antoinette A T P Brink; Arjen G C L Speksnijder; Christian J P A Hoebe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Impact and cost-effectiveness of chlamydia testing in Scotland: a mathematical modelling study.

Authors:  Katharine J Looker; Lesley A Wallace; Katherine M E Turner
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 2.432

7.  What explains anorectal chlamydia infection in women? Implications of a mathematical model for test and treatment strategies.

Authors:  Janneke C M Heijne; Geneviève A F S van Liere; Christian J P A Hoebe; Johannes A Bogaards; Birgit H B van Benthem; Nicole H T M Dukers-Muijrers
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 3.519

8.  Individual and population level effects of partner notification for Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  Christian L Althaus; Janneke C M Heijne; Sereina A Herzog; Adrian Roellin; Nicola Low
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  How robust are the natural history parameters used in chlamydia transmission dynamic models? A systematic review.

Authors:  Bethan Davies; Sarah-Jane Anderson; Katy M E Turner; Helen Ward
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.432

10.  Disease dynamics and costly punishment can foster socially imposed monogamy.

Authors:  Chris T Bauch; Richard McElreath
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.