Literature DB >> 22503838

A best-worst scaling survey of adolescents' level of concern for health and non-health consequences of smoking.

Joachim Marti1.   

Abstract

This paper uses best-worst scaling, a choice-based survey method, to assess adolescents' level of concern for various adverse consequences of tobacco use. In addition to health risks cited most often (i.e., lung cancer and cardiovascular diseases), the study also focuses on less frequently mentioned health implications (e.g., effects on teeth, appearance, skin, weight and sexual dysfunction) and other adverse effects that are unrelated to health, such as cost, addiction, or manipulation by the tobacco industry. The relative importance of 15 items was assessed in a sample of 376 adolescents (ages 14-19 years) in Western Switzerland. The resulting data provide rich information on the relative importance of the items considered and even allow for the assessment of individual-level preference scales. The results indicate that apart from lung cancer that is consistently rated as being of most concern, less-mentioned health risks such as reduced physical capacity and sexual dysfunction are of significant importance. Subgroup analyses and results from a random parameter approach highlight substantial heterogeneity in preferences that should be exploited in future prevention messages.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22503838     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  14 in total

1.  The Role of Personality in Treatment-Related Outcome Preferences Among Pharmacy Students.

Authors:  Ernest H Law; Ruixuan Jiang; Anika Kaczynski; Axel Mühlbacher; A Simon Pickard
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) Questionnaire to Understand Veterans' Preferences for Tobacco Treatment in Primary Care.

Authors:  David A Katz; Kenda R Stewart; Monica Paez; Mark W Vander Weg; Kathleen M Grant; Christine Hamlin; Gary Gaeth
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 3.  Valuing Meta-Health Effects for Use in Economic Evaluations to Inform Reimbursement Decisions: A Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Richard De Abreu Lourenco; Marion Haas; Jane Hall; Rosalie Viney
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Parent Preferences for Pediatric Clinician Messaging to Promote Smoking Cessation Treatment.

Authors:  Brian P Jenssen; Mary Kate Kelly; Jennifer Faerber; Chloe Hannan; David A Asch; Justine Shults; Robert A Schnoll; Alexander G Fiks
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Caregiver preferences for emerging duchenne muscular dystrophy treatments: a comparison of best-worst scaling and conjoint analysis.

Authors:  Ilene L Hollin; Holly L Peay; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Youth's narratives about family members smoking: parenting the parent- it's not fair!

Authors:  Roberta L Woodgate; Christine M Kreklewetz
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 7.  Using Best-Worst Scaling to Investigate Preferences in Health Care.

Authors:  Kei Long Cheung; Ben F M Wijnen; Ilene L Hollin; Ellen M Janssen; John F Bridges; Silvia M A A Evers; Mickael Hiligsmann
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Experimental measurement of preferences in health care using best-worst scaling (BWS): theoretical and statistical issues.

Authors:  Axel C Mühlbacher; Peter Zweifel; Anika Kaczynski; F Reed Johnson
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2016-01-29

9.  Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview.

Authors:  Axel C Mühlbacher; Anika Kaczynski; Peter Zweifel; F Reed Johnson
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2016-01-08

10.  Preferences for public involvement in health service decisions: a comparison between best-worst scaling and trio-wise stated preference elicitation techniques.

Authors:  Seda Erdem; Danny Campbell
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2016-12-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.