Literature DB >> 22503777

Simultaneous analysis of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers using microsphere-based xMAP multiplex technology for early detection of Alzheimer's disease.

Ju-Hee Kang1, Hugo Vanderstichele, John Q Trojanowski, Leslie M Shaw.   

Abstract

The xMAP-Luminex multiplex platform for measurement of Alzheimer's disease (AD) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers using Innogenetics AlzBio3 immunoassay reagents that are for research use only has been shown to be an effective tool for early detection of an AD-like biomarker signature based on concentrations of CSF Aβ(1-42), t-tau and p-tau(181). Among the several advantages of the xMAP-Luminex platform for AD CSF biomarkers are: a wide dynamic range of ready-to-use calibrators, time savings for the simultaneous analyses of three biomarkers in one analytical run, reduction of human error, potential of reduced cost of reagents, and a modest reduction of sample volume as compared to conventional enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA) methodology. Recent clinical studies support the use of CSF Aβ(1-42), t-tau and p-tau(181) measurement using the xMAP-Luminex platform for the early detection of AD pathology in cognitively normal individuals, and for prediction of progression to AD dementia in subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Studies that have shown the prediction of risk for progression to AD dementia by MCI patients provide the basis for the use of CSF Aβ(1-42), t-tau and p-tau(181) testing to assign risk for progression in patients enrolled in therapeutic trials. Furthermore emerging study data suggest that these pathologic changes occur in cognitively normal subjects 20 or more years before the onset of clinically detectable memory changes thus providing an objective measurement for use in the assessment of treatment effects in primary treatment trials. However, numerous previous ELISA and Luminex-based multiplex studies reported a wide range of absolute values of CSF Aβ(1-42), t-tau and p-tau(181) indicative of substantial inter-laboratory variability as well as varying degrees of intra-laboratory imprecision. In order to address these issues a recent inter-laboratory investigation that included a common set of CSF pool aliquots from controls as well as AD patients over a range of normal and pathological Aβ(1-42), t-tau and p-tau(181) values as well as agreed-on standard operating procedures (SOPs) assessed the reproducibility of the multiplex methodology and Innogenetics AlzBio3 immunoassay reagents. This study showed within-center precision values of 5% to a little more than 10% and good inter-laboratory %CV values (10-20%). There are several likely factors influencing the variability of CSF Aβ(1-42), t-tau and p-tau(181) measurements. In this review, we describe the pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical sources of variability including sources inherent to kits, and describe procedures to decrease the variability. A CSF AD biomarker Quality Control program has been established and funded by the Alzheimer Association, and global efforts are underway to further define optimal pre-analytical SOPs and best practices for the methodologies available or in development including plans for production of a standard reference material that could provide for a common standard against which manufacturers of immunoassay kits would assign calibration standard values.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22503777     DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.03.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods        ISSN: 1046-2023            Impact factor:   3.608


  31 in total

1.  Proteomic biomarkers for brain disorders: technical considerations and challenges.

Authors:  Linda S Brady; William Z Potter
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-2 interactions with Alzheimer's disease biomarkers.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Lane; Timothy J Hohman; Angela L Jefferson
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.978

3.  Comparison of two methods for the analysis of CSF Aβ and tau in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Matthew Faull; Simon Yl Ching; Anna I Jarmolowicz; John Beilby; Peter K Panegyres
Journal:  Am J Neurodegener Dis       Date:  2014-12-05

4.  Bead Based Multiplex Assay for Analysis of Tear Cytokine Profiles.

Authors:  Praveen Kumar Balne; Veonice Bijin Au; Louis Tong; Arkasubhra Ghosh; Mukesh Agrawal; John Connolly; Rupesh Agrawal
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 5.  2014 Update of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: A review of papers published since its inception.

Authors:  Michael W Weiner; Dallas P Veitch; Paul S Aisen; Laurel A Beckett; Nigel J Cairns; Jesse Cedarbaum; Robert C Green; Danielle Harvey; Clifford R Jack; William Jagust; Johan Luthman; John C Morris; Ronald C Petersen; Andrew J Saykin; Leslie Shaw; Li Shen; Adam Schwarz; Arthur W Toga; John Q Trojanowski
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 21.566

Review 6.  Unbiased approaches to biomarker discovery in neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Alice S Chen-Plotkin
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Does CSF p-tau181 help to discriminate Alzheimer's disease from other dementias and mild cognitive impairment? A meta-analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Wei Tang; Qiong Huang; Yu-You Yao; Yan Wang; Yi-Le Wu; Zheng-Yu Wang
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 8.  Early diagnosis of disease using microbead array technology: A review.

Authors:  Sanam Foroutan Parsa; Atieh Vafajoo; Azin Rostami; Reza Salarian; Mohammad Rabiee; Navid Rabiee; Ghazal Rabiee; Mohammadreza Tahriri; Amir Yadegari; Daryoosh Vashaee; Lobat Tayebi; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 6.558

Review 9.  Cerebrospinal fluid analysis in Alzheimer's disease: technical issues and future developments.

Authors:  Simone Lista; Henrik Zetterberg; Bruno Dubois; Kaj Blennow; Harald Hampel
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 10.  Multiplexed microarrays based on optically encoded microbeads.

Authors:  Atieh Vafajoo; Azin Rostami; Sanam Foroutan Parsa; Reza Salarian; Navid Rabiee; Ghazal Rabiee; Mohammad Rabiee; Mohammadreza Tahriri; Daryoosh Vashaee; Lobat Tayebi; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 2.838

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.