Literature DB >> 22503723

Which attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder children will be improved through neurofeedback therapy? A graph theoretical approach to neocortex neuronal network of ADHD.

Mehran Ahmadlou1, Reza Rostami, Vahid Sadeghi.   

Abstract

Neurofeedback training is increasingly used for ADHD treatment. However some ADHD patients are not treated through the long-time neurofeedback trainings with common protocols. In this paper a new graph theoretical approach is presented for EEG-based prediction of ADHD patients' responses to a common neurofeedback training: rewarding SMR activity (12-15 Hz) with inhibiting theta activity (4-8 Hz) and beta2 activity (18-25 Hz). Eyes closed EEGs of two groups before and after neurofeedback training were studied: ADHD patients with (15 children) and without (15 children) positive response to neurofeedback training. Employing a recent method to measure synchronization, fuzzy synchronization likelihood, functional connectivity graphs of the patients' brains were constructed in the full-band EEGs and 6 common EEG sub-bands produced by wavelet decomposition. Then, efficiencies of the brain networks in synchronizability and high speed information transmission were computed based on mean path length of the graphs, before and after neurofeedback training. The results were analyzed by ANOVA and showed synchronizability of the neocortex activity network at beta band in ADHDs with positive response is obviously less than that of ADHDs resistant to neurofeedback therapy, before treatment. The accuracy of linear discriminant analysis (LDA) in distinguishing these patients based on this feature is so high (84.2%) that this feature can be considered as reliable characteristics for prediction of responses of ADHDs to the neurofeedback trainings. Also difference between flexibility of the neocortex in beta band before and after treatment is obviously larger in the ADHDs with positive response in comparison to those with negative response which may be a neurophysiologic reason for dissatisfaction of the last group to the neurofeedback therapy.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22503723     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.03.087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  6 in total

1.  Down syndrome's brain dynamics: analysis of fractality in resting state.

Authors:  Sahel Hemmati; Mehran Ahmadlou; Masoud Gharib; Roshanak Vameghi; Firoozeh Sajedi
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 2.  Imaging functional and structural brain connectomics in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Miao Cao; Ni Shu; Qingjiu Cao; Yufeng Wang; Yong He
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 5.590

3.  Sensory and motor secondary symptoms as indicators of brain vulnerability.

Authors:  Nava Levit-Binnun; Michael Davidovitch; Yulia Golland
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 4.  Connectomics in psychiatric research: advances and applications.

Authors:  Miao Cao; Zhijiang Wang; Yong He
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 2.570

Review 5.  Electroencephalography signatures of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: clinical utility.

Authors:  Guzmán Alba; Ernesto Pereda; Soledad Mañas; Leopoldo D Méndez; Almudena González; Julián J González
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 2.570

Review 6.  Toward Developmental Connectomics of the Human Brain.

Authors:  Miao Cao; Hao Huang; Yun Peng; Qi Dong; Yong He
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.856

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.