Literature DB >> 22503487

Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 mutations in cholangiocarcinoma.

Benjamin R Kipp1, Jesse S Voss, Sarah E Kerr, Emily G Barr Fritcher, Rondell P Graham, Lizhi Zhang, W Edward Highsmith, Jun Zhang, Lewis R Roberts, Gregory J Gores, Kevin C Halling.   

Abstract

Somatic mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 genes are common in gliomas and help stratify patients with brain cancer into histologic and molecular subtypes. However, these mutations are considered rare in other solid tumors. The aims of this study were to determine the frequency of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 mutations in cholangiocarcinoma and to assess histopathologic differences between specimens with and without an isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation. We sequenced 94 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cholangiocarcinoma (67 intrahepatic and 27 extrahepatic) assessing for isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (codon 132) and isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (codons 140 and 172) mutations. Multiple histopathologic characteristics were also evaluated and compared with isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 mutation status. Of the 94 evaluated specimens, 21 (22%) had a mutation including 14 isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 7 isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 mutations. Isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations were more frequently observed in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma than in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (28% versus 7%, respectively; P = .030). The 14 isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutations were R132C (n = 9), R132S (n = 2), R132G (n = 2), and R132L (n = 1). The 7 isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 mutations were R172K (n = 5), R172M (n = 1), and R172G (n = 1). Isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations were more frequently observed in tumors with clear cell change (P < .001) and poorly differentiated histology (P = .012). The results of this study show for the first time that isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 genes are mutated in cholangiocarcinoma. The results of this study are encouraging because it identifies a new potential target for genotype-directed therapeutic trials and may represent a potential biomarker for earlier detection of cholangiocarcinoma in a subset of cases.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22503487     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2011.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.526


  87 in total

Review 1.  Cholangiocarcinoma: molecular pathways and therapeutic opportunities.

Authors:  Sumera Rizvi; Mitesh J Borad; Tushar Patel; Gregory J Gores
Journal:  Semin Liver Dis       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 6.115

Review 2.  Cholangiocarcinoma 2020: the next horizon in mechanisms and management.

Authors:  Jesus M Banales; Jose J G Marin; Angela Lamarca; Pedro M Rodrigues; Shahid A Khan; Lewis R Roberts; Vincenzo Cardinale; Guido Carpino; Jesper B Andersen; Chiara Braconi; Diego F Calvisi; Maria J Perugorria; Luca Fabris; Luke Boulter; Rocio I R Macias; Eugenio Gaudio; Domenico Alvaro; Sergio A Gradilone; Mario Strazzabosco; Marco Marzioni; Cédric Coulouarn; Laura Fouassier; Chiara Raggi; Pietro Invernizzi; Joachim C Mertens; Anja Moncsek; Sumera Rizvi; Julie Heimbach; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Jordi Bruix; Alejandro Forner; John Bridgewater; Juan W Valle; Gregory J Gores
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 3.  Current biologics for treatment of biliary tract cancers.

Authors:  Diana Y Zhao; Kian-Huat Lim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-06

4.  Molecular profiling of intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using next generation sequencing.

Authors:  Juan Putra; Francine B de Abreu; Jason D Peterson; J Marc Pipas; Kabir Mody; Christopher I Amos; Gregory J Tsongalis; Arief A Suriawinata
Journal:  Exp Mol Pathol       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.362

Review 5.  Therapeutic options for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Manojkumar Bupathi; Daniel H Ahn; Tanios Bekaii-Saab
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 6.  Molecular diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Hiroaki Haga; Tushar Patel
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 7.027

Review 7.  Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Nataliya Razumilava; Gregory J Gores
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  IDH mutations in liver cell plasticity and biliary cancer.

Authors:  Supriya K Saha; Christine A Parachoniak; Nabeel Bardeesy
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

9.  Adjuvant therapy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: the debate continues.

Authors:  Andrew X Zhu; Jennifer J Knox
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-12-07

10.  A Case of Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer Diagnosed Through Identification of an IDH1 Mutation.

Authors:  Suneel Deepak Kamath; Xiaoqi Lin; Aparna Kalyan
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-10-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.