Literature DB >> 22503474

Evaluation of femoral strains with cementless proximal-fill femoral implants of varied stem length.

Sally Arno1, Joseph Fetto, Nguyen Q Nguyen, Neal Kinariwala, Richelle Takemoto, Cheongeun Oh, Peter S Walker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The design intent of proximally-filling lateral flare femoral stems is to load the endosteal surface of the proximal femur both laterally and medially, to achieve normal bone strains. However, the long stem can contact the femoral cortex and may offload the proximal region to some extent. Therefore, in this study, we sought to determine if reducing the stem length, would result in physiologic strain patterns.
METHODS: Using the PhotoStress® method we analyzed 13 femurs intact and with three different stem length implants: stemless, ultra-short and short. The test rig loaded the femoral head by simulating the mid-stance single leg support phase of gait with the ilio-tibial band and the hip abductor forces. The strain distribution with each stem length implant was then compared to the intact strain distribution to determine which was most similar.
FINDINGS: As the stem length increased the femurs exhibited a typical pattern of reduced proximal strain and increased distal strain. However, there was some variation in this pattern indicating that the exact stem position and the location of its interaction with the endosteal surface of bone was not the same in each femur.
INTERPRETATION: The stemless design provided the best match compared to the native femur and therefore has the greatest potential to address the shortcomings of a stemmed femoral implant. However, the ultra-short implant also exhibited a strain distribution that closely emulated the intact femur, and may represent the best option as there are still several questions pertaining to stability and alignment of a stemless implant.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22503474     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  8 in total

1.  The learning curve following adoption of a novel short-stem prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty: implications on short-term patient outcomes.

Authors:  Jorge A Padilla; Afshin A Anoushiravani; James E Feng; Ran Schwarzkopf; James Slover; Scott Marwin
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-12-06

2.  The Odocoileus virginianus Femur: Mechanical Behavior and Morphology.

Authors:  Mark J Hedgeland; Morgan A Libruk; Nicole C Corbiere; Mario J Ciani; Laurel Kuxhaus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The loading patterns of a short femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty: gait analysis at increasing walking speeds and inclines.

Authors:  Anatole V Wiik; Mads Brevadt; Hardeep Johal; Kartik Logishetty; Oliver Boughton; Adeel Aqil; Justin P Cobb
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2018-08-17

4.  Biomechanical Behavior of an Hydroxyapatite-Coated Traditional Hip Stem and a Short One of Similar Design: Comparative Study Using Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Jesús Gómez-Vallejo; Jorge Roces-García; Jesús Moreta; Daniel Donaire-Hoyas; Óscar Gayoso; Fernando Marqués-López; Jorge Albareda
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-02-01

Review 5.  Ultra-Short Bone Conserving Cementless Femoral Stem.

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2021-12-01

6.  Excellent results with the cemented Lubinus SP II 130-mm femoral stem at 10 years of follow-up: 932 hips followed for 5-15 years.

Authors:  Wybren Prins; Remco Meijer; Boudewijn J Kollen; Cees Cpm Verheyen; Harmen B Ettema
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Contact Pattern between the Cortical Bone and Femoral Prosthesis after Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hiroshi Wada; Hajime Mishima; Hisashi Sugaya; Tomofumi Nishino; Masashi Yamazaki
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2016-01-10

8.  Comparative analysis of the biomechanical behavior of two different design metaphyseal-fitting short stems using digital image correlation.

Authors:  I Tatani; P Megas; A Panagopoulos; I Diamantakos; Ph Nanopoulos; Sp Pantelakis
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 2.819

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.