BACKGROUND: Brain imaging and behavioral studies suggest an inverse relationship between dopamine (DA) D2/D3 receptors and vulnerability to cocaine abuse, although most research has used males. For example, male monkeys that become dominant in a social group have significant elevations in D2/D3 receptor availability and are less vulnerable to cocaine reinforcement. METHODS: DA D2/D3 receptor availability was assessed in female cynomolgus monkeys (n = 16) with positron emission tomography (PET) while they were individually housed, 3 months after stable social hierarchies had formed, and again when individually housed. In addition, PET was used to examine changes in dopamine transporter (DAT) availability after social hierarchy formation. After imaging studies were complete, monkeys received implantation with indwelling intravenous catheters and self-administered cocaine (.001-.1 mg/kg/injection) under a fixed-ratio 30 schedule of reinforcement. Acquisition of cocaine reinforcement occurred when response rates were significantly higher than when saline was self-administered. RESULTS: Neither DAT nor D2/D3 receptor availability in the caudate nucleus and putamen was predictive of social rank, but both significantly changed after formation of social hierarchies. DA D2/D3 receptor availability significantly increased in females that became dominant, whereas DAT availability decreased in subordinate females. Dominant female monkeys acquired cocaine reinforcement at significantly lower doses than subordinate monkeys. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between D2/D3 receptor availability and vulnerability to cocaine reinforcement seems, on the basis of these findings, opposite in females and males. These data indicate that the social environment profoundly affects the DA system but does so in ways that have different functional consequences for females than for males.
BACKGROUND: Brain imaging and behavioral studies suggest an inverse relationship between dopamine (DA) D2/D3 receptors and vulnerability to cocaine abuse, although most research has used males. For example, male monkeys that become dominant in a social group have significant elevations in D2/D3 receptor availability and are less vulnerable to cocaine reinforcement. METHODS:DA D2/D3 receptor availability was assessed in female cynomolgus monkeys (n = 16) with positron emission tomography (PET) while they were individually housed, 3 months after stable social hierarchies had formed, and again when individually housed. In addition, PET was used to examine changes in dopamine transporter (DAT) availability after social hierarchy formation. After imaging studies were complete, monkeys received implantation with indwelling intravenous catheters and self-administered cocaine (.001-.1 mg/kg/injection) under a fixed-ratio 30 schedule of reinforcement. Acquisition of cocaine reinforcement occurred when response rates were significantly higher than when saline was self-administered. RESULTS: Neither DAT nor D2/D3 receptor availability in the caudate nucleus and putamen was predictive of social rank, but both significantly changed after formation of social hierarchies. DA D2/D3 receptor availability significantly increased in females that became dominant, whereas DAT availability decreased in subordinate females. Dominant female monkeys acquired cocaine reinforcement at significantly lower doses than subordinate monkeys. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between D2/D3 receptor availability and vulnerability to cocaine reinforcement seems, on the basis of these findings, opposite in females and males. These data indicate that the social environment profoundly affects the DA system but does so in ways that have different functional consequences for females than for males.
Authors: Amira K Brown; Mark A Mandelkern; Judah Farahi; Chelsea Robertson; Dara G Ghahremani; Brittany Sumerel; Nathasha Moallem; Edythe D London Journal: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2012-01-16 Impact factor: 5.176
Authors: Michael A Nader; Drake Morgan; H Donald Gage; Susan H Nader; Tonya L Calhoun; Nancy Buchheimer; Richard Ehrenkaufer; Robert H Mach Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2006-07-09 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: R H Mach; M A Nader; R L Ehrenkaufer; H D Gage; S R Childers; L M Hodges; M M Hodges; H M Davies Journal: Synapse Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 2.562
Authors: Paul W Czoty; Natallia V Riddick; H Donald Gage; Mikki Sandridge; Susan H Nader; Sudha Garg; Michael Bounds; Pradeep K Garg; Michael A Nader Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2008-02-06 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: C R Yang; Y Y Bai; C S Ruan; H F Zhou; D Liu; X F Wang; L J Shen; H Y Zheng; X F Zhou Journal: Neurotox Res Date: 2014-11-04 Impact factor: 3.911
Authors: Susan E Martelle; Susan H Nader; Paul W Czoty; William S John; Angela N Duke; Pradeep K Garg; Sudha Garg; Amy H Newman; Michael A Nader Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2014-05-29 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Monika M Stojek; Jessica L Maples-Keller; Hayley Drew Dixon; Guillermo E Umpierrez; Charles F Gillespie; Vasiliki Michopoulos Journal: Appetite Date: 2019-06-08 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Laura J Mosher; Sean C Godar; Marc Morissette; Kenneth M McFarlin; Simona Scheggi; Carla Gambarana; Stephen C Fowler; Thérèse Di Paolo; Marco Bortolato Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2018-02-16 Impact factor: 4.905