Literature DB >> 22501056

Role of community tolerance level (CTL) in predicting the prevalence of the annoyance of road and rail noise.

Paul Schomer1, Vincent Mestre, Sanford Fidell, Bernard Berry, Truls Gjestland, Michel Vallet, Timothy Reid.   

Abstract

Fidell et al. [(2011), J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 130(2), 791-806] have shown (1) that the rate of growth of annoyance with noise exposure reported in attitudinal surveys of the annoyance of aircraft noise closely resembles the exponential rate of change of loudness with sound level, and (2) that the proportion of a community highly annoyed and the variability in annoyance prevalence rates in communities are well accounted for by a simple model with a single free parameter: a community tolerance level (abbreviated CTL, and represented symbolically in mathematical expressions as L(ct)), expressed in units of DNL. The current study applies the same modeling approach to predicting the prevalence of annoyance of road traffic and rail noise. The prevalence of noise-induced annoyance of all forms of transportation noise is well accounted for by a simple, loudness-like exponential function with community-specific offsets. The model fits all of the road traffic findings well, but the prevalence of annoyance due to rail noise is more accurately predicted separately for interviewing sites with and without high levels of vibration and/or rattle.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22501056     DOI: 10.1121/1.3688762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  5 in total

Review 1.  ICBEN review of research on the biological effects of noise 2011-2014.

Authors:  Mathias Basner; Mark Brink; Abigail Bristow; Yvonne de Kluizenaar; Lawrence Finegold; Jiyoung Hong; Sabine A Janssen; Ronny Klaeboe; Tony Leroux; Andreas Liebl; Toshihito Matsui; Dieter Schwela; Mariola Sliwinska-Kowalska; Patrik Sörqvist
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.867

2.  Community Response to Multiple Sound Sources: Integrating Acoustic and Contextual Approaches in the Analysis.

Authors:  Peter Lercher; Bert De Coensel; Luc Dekonink; Dick Botteldooren
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Reply to Guski, Schreckenberg, Schuemer, Brink and Stansfeld: Comment on Gjestland, T. A Systematic Review of the Basis for WHO's New Recommendation for Limiting Aircraft Noise Annoyance. Int. J. Env. Res. Pub. Health 2018, 15, 2717.

Authors:  Truls Gjestland
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Impact of uncertainties related to noise indicator determination on observed exposure-effect relationship.

Authors:  Christian Kirisits; Christoph Lechner; Helmut Kirisits
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.867

5.  Exposure-Response Functions for the Effects of Traffic Noise on Self-Reported Annoyance and Sleep Disturbance in Finland: Effect of Exposure Estimation Method.

Authors:  Tarja Yli-Tuomi; Anu W Turunen; Pekka Tiittanen; Timo Lanki
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.