Literature DB >> 22499594

Physiological response to drought in radiata pine: phytohormone implication at leaf level.

N De Diego1, F Pérez-Alfocea, E Cantero, M Lacuesta, P Moncaleán.   

Abstract

Pinus radiata D. Don is one of the most abundant species in the north of Spain. Knowledge of drought response mechanisms is essential to guarantee plantation survival under reduced water supply as predicted in the future. Tolerance mechanisms are being studied in breeding programs, because information on such mechanisms can be used for genotype selection. In this paper, we analyze the changes of leaf water potential, hydraulic conductance (K(leaf)), stomatal conductance and phytohormones under drought in P. radiata breeds (O1, O2, O3, O4, O5 and O6) from different climatology areas, hypothesizing that they could show variable drought tolerance. As a primary signal, drought decreased cytokinin (zeatin and zeatin riboside-Z + ZR) levels in needles parallel to K(leaf) and gas exchange. When Z + ZR decreased by 65%, indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and abscisic acid (ABA) accumulation started as a second signal and increments were higher for IAA than for ABA. When plants decreased by 80%, Z + ZR and K(leaf) doubled their ABA and IAA levels, the photosystem II yield decreased and the electrolyte leakage increased. At the end of the drought period, less tolerant breeds increased IAA over 10-fold compared with controls. External damage also induced jasmonic acid accumulation in all breeds except in O5 (P. radiata var. radiata × var. cedrosensis), which accumulated salicylic acid as a defense mechanism. After rewatering, only the most tolerant plants recovered their K(leaf,) perhaps due to an IAA decrease and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid maintenance. From all phytohormones, IAA was the most representative 'water deficit signal' in P. radiata.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22499594     DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tps029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tree Physiol        ISSN: 0829-318X            Impact factor:   4.196


  7 in total

1.  Abscisic acid mediates a divergence in the drought response of two conifers.

Authors:  Timothy J Brodribb; Scott A M McAdam
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Morphological and physiological variations of Cyclocarya paliurus under different soil water capacities.

Authors:  Ying Feng; Xiulian Lin; Lianwen Qian; Nengjing Hu; Chunfeng Kuang; Xiaofeng Li; Zheng Li; Liangrui Huang; Mingming Liu
Journal:  Physiol Mol Biol Plants       Date:  2020-07-27

3.  Contrasting dynamics of leaf potential and gas exchange during progressive drought cycles and recovery in Amorpha fruticosa and Robinia pseudoacacia.

Authors:  Weiming Yan; Shuxia Zheng; Yangquanwei Zhong; Zhouping Shangguan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Transcriptome analysis of Pinus halepensis under drought stress and during recovery.

Authors:  Hagar Fox; Adi Doron-Faigenboim; Gilor Kelly; Ronny Bourstein; Ziv Attia; Jing Zhou; Yosef Moshe; Menachem Moshelion; Rakefet David-Schwartz
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.196

Review 5.  Experimental Design and Sample Preparation in Forest Tree Metabolomics.

Authors:  Ana M Rodrigues; Ana I Ribeiro-Barros; Carla António
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2019-11-22

6.  Proteome-Wide Analysis of Heat-Stress in Pinus radiata Somatic Embryos Reveals a Combined Response of Sugar Metabolism and Translational Regulation Mechanisms.

Authors:  Ander Castander-Olarieta; Cátia Pereira; Itziar A Montalbán; Vera M Mendes; Sandra Correia; Sonia Suárez-Álvarez; Bruno Manadas; Jorge Canhoto; Paloma Moncaleán
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Integration of Phenomics and Metabolomics Datasets Reveals Different Mode of Action of Biostimulants Based on Protein Hydrolysates in Lactuca sativa L. and Solanum lycopersicum L. Under Salinity.

Authors:  Mirella Sorrentino; Klára Panzarová; Ioannis Spyroglou; Lukáš Spíchal; Valentina Buffagni; Paola Ganugi; Youssef Rouphael; Giuseppe Colla; Luigi Lucini; Nuria De Diego
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 5.753

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.