Literature DB >> 22498729

Hydrodynamic pressure sensing with an artificial lateral line in steady and unsteady flows.

Roberto Venturelli1, Otar Akanyeti, Francesco Visentin, Jaas Ježov, Lily D Chambers, Gert Toming, Jennifer Brown, Maarja Kruusmaa, William M Megill, Paolo Fiorini.   

Abstract

With the overall goal being a better understanding of the sensing environment from the local perspective of a situated agent, we studied uniform flows and Kármán vortex streets in a frame of reference relevant to a fish or swimming robot. We visualized each flow regime with digital particle image velocimetry and then took local measurements using a rigid body with laterally distributed parallel pressure sensor arrays. Time and frequency domain methods were used to characterize hydrodynamically relevant scenarios in steady and unsteady flows for control applications. Here we report that a distributed pressure sensing mechanism has the capability to discriminate Kármán vortex streets from uniform flows, and determine the orientation and position of the platform with respect to the incoming flow and the centre axis of the Kármán vortex street. It also enables the computation of hydrodynamic features which may be relevant for a robot while interacting with the flow, such as vortex shedding frequency, vortex travelling speed and downstream distance between vortices. A Kármán vortex street was distinguished in this study from uniform flows by analysing the magnitude of fluctuations present in the sensor measurements and the number of sensors detecting the same dominant frequency. In the Kármán vortex street the turbulence intensity was 30% higher than that in the uniform flow and the sensors collectively sensed the vortex shedding frequency as the dominant frequency. The position and orientation of the sensor platform were determined via a comparative analysis between laterally distributed sensor arrays; the vortex travelling speed was estimated via a cross-correlation analysis among the sensors.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22498729     DOI: 10.1088/1748-3182/7/3/036004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinspir Biomim        ISSN: 1748-3182            Impact factor:   2.956


  6 in total

1.  Head width influences flow sensing by the lateral line canal system in fishes.

Authors:  Yuzo R Yanagitsuru; Otar Akanyeti; James C Liao
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  A fish perspective: detecting flow features while moving using an artificial lateral line in steady and unsteady flow.

Authors:  L D Chambers; O Akanyeti; R Venturelli; J Ježov; J Brown; M Kruusmaa; P Fiorini; W M Megill
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  Behavior, Electrophysiology, and Robotics Experiments to Study Lateral Line Sensing in Fishes.

Authors:  Melanie Haehnel-Taguchi; Otar Akanyeti; James C Liao
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.326

4.  Hydrogel microphones for stealthy underwater listening.

Authors:  Yang Gao; Jingfeng Song; Shumin Li; Christian Elowsky; You Zhou; Stephen Ducharme; Yong Mei Chen; Qin Zhou; Li Tan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 5.  A Review of Artificial Lateral Line in Sensor Fabrication and Bionic Applications for Robot Fish.

Authors:  Guijie Liu; Anyi Wang; Xinbao Wang; Peng Liu
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 1.781

6.  Research on Flow Field Perception Based on Artificial Lateral Line Sensor System.

Authors:  Guijie Liu; Mengmeng Wang; Anyi Wang; Shirui Wang; Tingting Yang; Reza Malekian; Zhixiong Li
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-11       Impact factor: 3.576

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.