Literature DB >> 22498207

Urological laparoendoscopic single site surgery: multi-institutional analysis of risk factors for conversion and postoperative complications.

Riccardo Autorino1, Jihad H Kaouk, Rachid Yakoubi, Koon Ho Rha, Robert J Stein, Wesley M White, Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg, Luca Cindolo, Evangelos Liatsikos, Soroush Rais-Bahrami, Alessandro Volpe, Deok Hyun Han, Ithaar H Derweesh, Seung Wook Lee, Aly M Abdel-Karim, Anibal Branco, Francesco Greco, Mohamad Allaf, Rene Sotelo, Panagiotis Kallidonis, Byong Chang Jeong, Sara Best, Wassim Bazzi, Phillip Pierorazio, Salah Elsalmy, Abhay Rane, Woong Kyu Han, Bo Yang, Luigi Schips, Wilson R Molina, Paolo Fornara, Carlo Terrone, Camilo Giedelman, Joo Yong Lee, Sebastien Crouzet, Georges-Pascal Haber, Lee Richstone, Sun Yinghao, Fernando J Kim, Jeffrey A Cadeddu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We analyzed the incidence of and risk factors for complications and conversions in a large contemporary series of patients treated with urological laparoendoscopic single site surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study cohort consisted of consecutive patients treated with laparoendoscopic single site surgery between August 2007 and December 2010 at a total of 21 institutions. A logistic regression model was used to analyze the risks of conversion, and of any grade and only high grade postoperative complications.
RESULTS: Included in analysis were 1,163 cases. Intraoperatively complications occurred in 3.3% of cases. The overall conversion rate was 19.6% with 14.6%, 4% and 1.1% of procedures converted to reduced port laparoscopy, conventional laparoscopic/robotic surgery and open surgery, respectively. On multivariable analysis the factors significantly associated with the risk of conversion were oncological surgical indication (p=0.02), pelvic surgery (p<0.001), robotic approach (p<0.001), high difficulty score (p=0.004), extended operative time (p=0.03) and an intraoperative complication (p=0.001). A total of 120 postoperative complications occurred in 109 patients (9.4%) with major complications in only 2.4% of the entire cohort. Reconstructive procedure (p=0.03), high difficulty score (p=0.002) and extended operative time (p=0.02) predicted high grade complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Urological laparoendoscopic single site surgery can be done with a low complication rate, resembling that in laparoscopic series. The conversion rate suggests that early adopters of the technique have adhered to the principles of careful patient selection and safety. Besides facilitating future comparisons across institutions, this analysis can be useful to counsel patients on the current risks of urological laparoendoscopic single site surgery.
Copyright © 2012 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22498207     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.01.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  10 in total

Review 1.  Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in kidney surgery: clinical experience and future perspectives.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kallidonis; Stavros Kontogiannis; Iason Kyriazis; Ioannis Georgiopoulos; Abdulrahman Al-Aown; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Robot-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site partial nephrectomy with the novel da vinci single-site platform: initial experience.

Authors:  Christos Komninos; Patrick Tuliao; Dae Keun Kim; Young Deuk Choi; Byung Ha Chung; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2014-06-16

3.  First Canadian experience with robotic laparoendoscopic single-site vs. standard laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy: A prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Patrick P Luke; Shahid Aquil; Bijad Alharbi; Hemant Sharma; Alp Sener
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Costs analysis of laparoendoscopic, single-site laparoscopic and open surgery for cT1 renal masses in a European high-volume centre.

Authors:  Giovannalberto Pini; Luigi Ascalone; Francesco Greco; Nasreldin Mohammed; Paolo Fornara
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Focal Cryotherapy in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: Are We Treating the Cancer or the Mind? - The Cancer.

Authors:  Rodrigo Donalisio da Silva; Fernando J Kim
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

6.  Prediction model of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology using machine learning algorithm.

Authors:  Jun Ma; Jiani Yang; Shanshan Cheng; Yue Jin; Nan Zhang; Chao Wang; Yu Wang
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 1.195

Review 7.  Laparoendoscopic single site surgery versus conventional laparoscopy for transperitoneal pyeloplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Luis Felipe Brandao; Humberto Laydner; Homayoun Zargar; Fabio Torricelli; Cassio Andreoni; Jihad Kaouk; Riccardo Autorino
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

8.  Laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery: recent advances in urology.

Authors:  Riccardo Autorino; Roman Sosnowski; Marco De Sio; Omero Simone; Ali Khalifeh; Jihad H Kaouk
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2012-12-11

9.  Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for the treatment of different urological pathologies: Defining the learning curve of an experienced laparoscopist.

Authors:  Aly M Abdel-Karim; Ibrahim M Elhenawy; Ahmed A Eid; Elsayed Yahia; Salah A Elsalmy
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2017-07-13

Review 10.  Laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mark P Broe; Rose Galvin; Lorna G Keenan; Richard E Power
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2018-07-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.