BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy with a possible polypectomy is an efficient and preferred screening method to reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, critics argue that, to date, a reduction of incidence and mortality from CRC has not been demonstrated in a population-based setting. OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of and mortality from CRC among individuals screened by colonoscopy and non-screened individuals. DESIGN: A closed cohort study. SETTING: Population-based setting in a precisely defined area with a low level of population migration. PATIENTS: This study involved 1912 screened and 20,774 control participants. INTERVENTION: CRC cases in this closed cohort study were prospectively collected during the screening period of 1 year and the follow-up period of 6 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Follow-up data were corrected for negligible migration balance in the area. Tumor characteristics and risk or protective factors, age and sex, participation in general health screening examinations, history of CRC in a first-degree relative, smoking status, body mass index, frequency of sports activity, eating habits, and patients' professions were recorded. RESULTS: Overall cancer incidence was significantly lower in the screened group compared with the non-screened group (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16-0.59; P < .001). Colon cancer-associated mortality also was clearly lower (adjusted OR 0.12; 95% CI, 0.01-0.93; P = .04). Risk factors such as lifestyle, smoking, and body mass index as well as family history were similar in both groups. Blue-collar workers had a higher incidence of CRC compared with professionals. The risk factors for CRC were a positive family history and smoking. LIMITATIONS: Number and ethnicity of the participants, non-randomized study. CONCLUSION: Colonoscopy with polypectomy significantly reduces CRC incidence and cancer-related mortality in the general population.
BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy with a possible polypectomy is an efficient and preferred screening method to reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, critics argue that, to date, a reduction of incidence and mortality from CRC has not been demonstrated in a population-based setting. OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of and mortality from CRC among individuals screened by colonoscopy and non-screened individuals. DESIGN: A closed cohort study. SETTING: Population-based setting in a precisely defined area with a low level of population migration. PATIENTS: This study involved 1912 screened and 20,774 control participants. INTERVENTION: CRC cases in this closed cohort study were prospectively collected during the screening period of 1 year and the follow-up period of 6 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Follow-up data were corrected for negligible migration balance in the area. Tumor characteristics and risk or protective factors, age and sex, participation in general health screening examinations, history of CRC in a first-degree relative, smoking status, body mass index, frequency of sports activity, eating habits, and patients' professions were recorded. RESULTS: Overall cancer incidence was significantly lower in the screened group compared with the non-screened group (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16-0.59; P < .001). Colon cancer-associated mortality also was clearly lower (adjusted OR 0.12; 95% CI, 0.01-0.93; P = .04). Risk factors such as lifestyle, smoking, and body mass index as well as family history were similar in both groups. Blue-collar workers had a higher incidence of CRC compared with professionals. The risk factors for CRC were a positive family history and smoking. LIMITATIONS: Number and ethnicity of the participants, non-randomized study. CONCLUSION: Colonoscopy with polypectomy significantly reduces CRC incidence and cancer-related mortality in the general population.
Authors: Eduardo Coghlan; Luis Laferrere; Elisa Zenon; Juan Manuel Marini; German Rainero; Alberto San Roman; Maria Lourdes Posadas Martinez; Angel Nadales Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2019-05-29 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Angela N Bartley; Nila Parikh; Chiu-Hsieh Hsu; Denise J Roe; Julie A Buckmeier; Lynda Corley; Ron A Phipps; Gary Gallick; Peter Lance; Patricia A Thompson; Stanley R Hamilton Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2013-09-05
Authors: Xian-rui Wu; James M Church; Awad Jarrar; Jennifer Liang; Matthew F Kalady Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2013-02-26 Impact factor: 2.571