Literature DB >> 22498037

Binge drinking intensity and health-related quality of life among US adult binge drinkers.

Xiao-Jun Wen1, Dafna Kanny, William W Thompson, Catherine A Okoro, Machell Town, Lina S Balluz.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Binge drinking (men, ≥ 5 drinks, women, ≥ 4 on an occasion) accounts for more than half of the 79,000 annual deaths due to excessive alcohol use in the United States. The frequency of binge drinking is associated with poor health-related quality of life (HRQOL), but the association between binge drinking intensity and HRQOL is unknown. Our objective was to examine this association.
METHODS: We used 2008-2010 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data and multivariate linear regression models to examine the association between binge drinking intensity (largest number of drinks consumed on any occasion) among US adult binge drinkers and 2 HRQOL indicators: number of physically and mentally unhealthy days.
RESULTS: Among binge drinkers, the highest-intensity binge drinkers (women consuming ≥ 7 drinks and men consuming ≥ 8 drinks on any occasion) were more likely to report poor HRQOL than binge drinkers who reported lower levels of intensity (women who consumed 4 drinks and men who consumed 5 drinks on any occasion). On average, female binge drinkers reported more physically and mentally unhealthy days (2.8 d and 5.1 d, respectively) than male binge drinkers (2.5 d and 3.6 d, respectively). After adjustment for confounding factors, women who consumed ≥ 7 drinks on any occasion reported more mentally unhealthy days (6.3 d) than women who consumed 4 drinks (4.6 d). Compared with male binge drinkers across the age groups, female binge drinkers had a significantly higher mean number of mentally unhealthy days.
CONCLUSION: Our findings underscore the importance of implementing effective population-level strategies to prevent binge drinking and improve HRQOL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22498037      PMCID: PMC3396549          DOI: 10.5888/pcd9.110204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis        ISSN: 1545-1151            Impact factor:   2.830


MEDSCAPE CME

Medscape, LLC is pleased to provide online continuing medical education (CME) for this journal article, allowing clinicians the opportunity to earn CME credit. This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education through the joint sponsorship of Medscape, LLC and Preventing Chronic Disease. Medscape, LLC is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians. Medscape, LLC designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. All other clinicians completing this activity will be issued a certificate of participation. To participate in this journal CME activity: (1) review the learning objectives and author disclosures; (2) study the education content; (3) take the post-test with a 70% minimum passing score and complete the evaluation at www.medscape.org/journal/pcd (4) view/print certificate. Release date: April 11, 2012; Expiration date: April 11, 2013

Learning Objectives

Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to: Describe the association between binge drinking intensity among US adult binge drinkers and HRQOL, based on a cross-sectional US study Compare male and female binge drinkers in terms of the number of physically and mentally unhealthy days, based on a cross-sectional US study Describe factors affecting HRQOL in female binge drinkers, based on a cross-sectional US study CME EDITOR Ellen Taratus, Editor, Preventing Chronic Disease. Disclosure: Ellen Taratus has disclosed no relevant financial relationships. CME AUTHOR Laurie Barclay, MD. Freelance writer and reviewer, Medscape, LLC. Disclosure: Laurie Barclay, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships. AUTHORS AND CREDENTIALS Disclosures: Xiao-Jun Wen, MD; Dafna Kanny, PhD; William W. Thompson, PhD; Catherine A. Okoro, MS; Machell Town, MS; and Lina S. Balluz, ScD, MPH have disclosed no relevant financial relationships. Affiliations: Dafna Kanny, Xiao-Jun Wen, William W. Thompson, Catherine A. Okoro, Machell Town, Lina S. Balluz, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.

Introduction

Excessive alcohol consumption, including binge and underage drinking, is the third leading preventable cause of death in the United States, and binge drinking, defined for women as consuming 4 or more alcoholic drinks on an occasion and for men as consuming 5 or more drinks on an occasion, accounts for more than half of the 79,000 annual deaths due to excessive drinking (1,2). Binge drinking is a common form of excessive alcohol use in the United States (1). According to 2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data, an estimated 15.2% of adults (20.7% of men and 10.0% of women) are binge drinkers (2). Among some population groups, such as people aged 18 to 34 years, the prevalence of binge drinking is even higher (2,3). The frequency (4) (ie, number of binge drinking episodes within a defined time period) and intensity (4) (ie, number of drinks consumed per episode) of binge drinking are 2 measures used to examine the adverse health effects for this risk behavior (5). Several studies have demonstrated that risk of alcohol-related illness and death increases with the intensity of binge drinking (6-8). Several studies have examined the association between health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and alcohol use (9,10) and the association between binge drinking and certain risk behaviors (eg, alcohol-impaired driving and violence) (11,12). In 2004, 1 study (13) reported that frequent binge drinking was associated with significantly worse HRQOL and mental distress, including stress, depression, and emotional problems. However, the relationship between the intensity of binge drinking per episode and HRQOL has not been examined. The primary objective of this study was to examine the association between HRQOL and the intensity of binge drinking among US adult binge drinkers. A secondary objective was to compare sex differences in HRQOL by sociodemographic characteristics and the intensity of binge drinking.

Methods

We used 2008-2010 BRFSS data and multivariate linear regression models to assess the relationship between binge drinking intensity and HRQOL.

Data source

The BRFSS survey is a state-based, continuous random-digit–dialed telephone survey that collects information on risk behaviors and health conditions from noninstitutionalized adults aged 18 or older in 50 states; Washington, DC; and US territories. Trained interviewers collect data monthly by using an independent probability sample of households with landline telephones. The characteristics, survey design, and random sampling of BRFSS are described elsewhere (14). The validity and reliability of BRFSS data have been demonstrated (15,16).

Assessment of binge drinking

We defined binge drinking by using the question, "Considering all types of alcoholic beverages, how many times during the past 30 days did you have [5 for men, 4 for women] or more drinks on an occasion?" We assessed the intensity of binge drinking among binge drinkers by using the question, "During the past 30 days, what is the largest number of drinks you had on any occasion?" We calculated the median largest number of drinks consumed and then categorized female binge drinkers into 4 groups (4, 5, 6, and 7 or more drinks on any occasion during the past 30 days); and male binge drinkers into 4 groups (5, 6, 7, and 8 or more drinks on any occasion during the past 30 days).

Assessment and definition of HRQOL

We analyzed 2 of the HRQOL questions that are administered annually in the core BRFSS survey: 1) "Now thinking about your physical health, which includes physical illness and injury, for how many days during the past 30 days was your physical health not good?" and 2) "Now thinking about your mental health, which includes stress, depression, and problems with emotions, for how many days during the past 30 days was your mental health not good?" The reliability and validity of these measures have been described (17). We calculated physically and mentally unhealthy days according to the methodology and computer program code published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (18).

Participants

We examined 2008-2010 BRFSS data from respondents who resided in any of the 50 states and Washington, DC, and reported at least 1 binge drinking episode in the past 30 days. Of the 133,353 binge drinkers, 76,269 (66.6%) were men. The median response rates (calculated according to Council of American Survey Research Organizations methods) were 53.3% (range, 35.8%-65.9%) for 2008, 52.5% (range, 37.9%-68.9%) for 2009, and 54.6% (range, 39.1%-68.8%) for 2010. The cooperation rates were 75.0% (range, 59.3%-87.8%) for 2008, 75.0% (range, 55.0%-88.0%) for 2009, and 76.9% (range, 56.8%-86.1%) for 2010.

Sociodemographic characteristics

We analyzed binge drinking intensity and HRQOL by the following sociodemographic variables: age group (18-44 y and ≥45 y); race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic other); marital status (married, previously married, and never married); education (

Data analysis

We calculated the mean number of physically and mentally unhealthy days by sociodemographic characteristic and by binge drinking intensity. We conducted multivariate linear regression analyses for the predicted mean number of unhealthy days by sex and largest number of drinks consumed while adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, education, marital status, income, and employment. Because of the complex sampling design of BRFSS, we used SUDAAN version 9.2 (Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina) to calculate weighted prevalence estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used nonoverlapping 95% CIs as the criteria for statistical significance.

Results

The median largest number of drinks consumed was 5 (range, 4-14 drinks) for female binge drinkers and 6 (range, 5-29 drinks) for male binge drinkers. Among women, the median intensity of binge drinking was similar among sociodemographic groups. However, among men, the median intensity of binge drinking was higher among men aged 18 to 44 (7 drinks) than among men aged 45 or older (6 drinks), among men who never married (8 drinks) than among men who were married (6 drinks), and among men who were homemaker/students (8 drinks) than among men who were retired or employed (6 drinks). Overall, female binge drinkers reported more unhealthy days (2.8 physically unhealthy days and 5.1 mentally unhealthy days) than male binge drinkers (2.5 physically unhealthy days and 3.6 mentally unhealthy days) (Table 1). The mean number of mentally unhealthy days among women and men aged 18 to 44 was significantly higher than the mean number for those aged 45 or older, whereas the mean number of physically unhealthy days among men and women aged 45 or older was significantly higher than the mean number for the younger age group. Men and women who were previously married had a significantly higher mean number of physically and mentally unhealthy days than men and women who were married or never married.
Table 1.

Mean Unhealthy Days by Selected Characteristics and Binge Drinking Intensity Among US Adult Binge Drinkers, 2008-2010a

Characteristic Nb Physically Unhealthy Days Mean (95% CI)Mentally Unhealthy Days Mean (95% CI)
Women
Overall 56,6562.8 (2.7-2.9)5.1 (5.0-5.3)
Age, y
18-4427,2622.5 (2.4-2.6)5.4 (5.2-5.6)
≥4529,3943.4 (3.2-3.5)4.5 (4.4-4.7)
Race/ethnicity
White non-Hispanic46,5392.6 (2.5-2.7)4.8 (4.7-4.9)
Black non-Hispanic3,6603.5 (2.9-4.1)7.0 (6.3-7.7)
Hispanic3,1732.9 (2.5-3.3)5.6 (5.0-6.3)
Other non-Hispanic2,9953.7 (3.2-4.2)6.2 (5.5-6.9)
Marital status
Married32,7662.4 (2.3-2.5)4.3 (4.2-4.5)
Previously married14,0744.3 (4.1-4.6)7.1 (6.8-7.4)
Never married9,7232.8 (2.5-3.0)5.7 (5.4-6.1)
Education
<high school diploma3,0315.1 (4.6-5.7)8.3 (7.5-9.0)
High school diploma14,9373.5 (3.3-3.7)6.3 (5.9-6.6)
Some college or technical school17,0852.8 (2.6-3.0)5.4 (5.2-5.7)
≥College degree21,5711.9 (1.8-2.0)3.7 (3.5-3.9)
Employment
Employed38,8732.1 (2.0-2.2)4.6 (4.4-4.7)
Unemployed3,9604.4 (3.9-4.8)8.6 (8.0-9.1)
Homemaker/student6,7562.7 (2.4-3.0)5.2 (4.9-5.6)
Retired5,1403.5 (3.2-3.9)2.9 (2.6-3.3)
Unable to work1,85114.0 (12.9-15.2)13.4 (12.3-14.5)
Income, $
<25,00011,1784.9 (4.6-5.2)8.1 (7.7-8.5)
25,000 to <50,00013,1162.9 (2.7-3.0)5.8 (5.5-6.1)
≥50,00027,9771.9 (1.8-2.1)3.7 (3.6-3.9)
Largest no. of drinks consumed on any occasion
422,7792.5 (2.3-2.7)4.3 (4.1-4.5)
510,4132.5 (2.3-2.7)4.8 (4.4-5.1)
68,6922.7 (2.4-2.9)5.4 (5.1-5.8)
≥78,5593.2 (3.0-3.4)6.9 (6.5-7.2)
Men
Overall 75,5642.5 (2.4-2.5)3.6 (3.5-3.7)
Age, y
18-4433,8502.1 (2.0-2.2)3.8 (3.6-3.9)
≥4541,7143.2 (3.1-3.4)3.1 (3.0-3.2)
Race/ethnicity
White non-Hispanic62,0072.3 (2.2-2.4)3.3 (3.2-3.5)
Black non-Hispanic3,5133.0 (2.6-3.3)4.8 (4.2-5.4)
Hispanic5,1152.7 (2.4-2.9)3.8 (3.4-4.1)
Other non-Hispanic4,2903.0 (2.6-3.4)4.1 (3.6-4.6)
Marital status
Married46,7612.1 (2.0-2.2)2.9 (2.8-3.1)
Previously married14,5494.4 (4.1-4.8)5.4 (5.1-5.8)
Never married14,1152.4 (2.2-2.5)4.2 (4.0-4.5)
Education
<high school diploma5,6104.2 (3.8-4.6)5.4 (4.9-5.9)
High school diploma23,5122.9 (2.7-3.1)4.0 (3.8-4.3)
Some college20,2312.4 (2.2-2.5)3.7 (3.5-3.9)
≥College degree26,1471.6 (1.5-1.7)2.5 (2.3-2.6)
Employment
Employed55,4991.8 (1.7-1.9)3.0 (2.9-3.1)
Unemployed5,9243.8 (3.4-4.2)6.4 (6.0-6.9)
Homemaker/student1,7802.0 (1.7-2.3)3.7 (3.2-4.2)
Retired9,6033.7 (3.4-4.0)2.3 (2.1-2.6)
Unable to work2,63214.5 (13.4-15.7)11.2 (10.2-12.3)
Income, $
<25,00012,7764.6 (4.3-4.9)5.8 (5.4-6.1)
25,000 to <50,00017,8842.5 (2.3-2.7)3.7 (3.5-3.9)
≥50,00040,2491.7 (1.6-1.7)2.6 (2.5-2.8)
Largest no. of drinks consumed on any occasion
518,8632.2 (2.0-2.3)2.8 (2.6-3.0)
616,2922.3 (2.1-2.5)2.9 (2.7-3.1)
75,4542.0 (1.7-2.2)2.8 (2.5-3.1)
≥826,8572.6 (2.5-2.8)4.3 (4.1-4.5)

Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.

Data from 50 states and Washington, DC, 2008-2010 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking defined as 4 or more drinks for women and 5 drinks or more drinks for men on an occasion.

Sample sizes vary because of missing values in mentally unhealthy days and physically unhealthy days.

Female binge drinkers who consumed 7 or more drinks on any occasion reported significantly more unhealthy days (3.2 physical and 6.9 mental) compared with those who were binge drinking at a lower intensity (Table 1). Similarly, male binge drinkers who consumed 8 or more drinks on any occasion reported significantly more mentally unhealthy days (4.3 d) compared with those who were binge drinking at a lower intensity. After adjustment for potential confounding factors (age, race/ethnicity, education, marital status, income, and employment), female binge drinkers who consumed 7 or more drinks had more mentally unhealthy days compared with female binge drinkers who consumed 4 drinks, and male binge drinkers who consumed 8 or more drinks had more mentally unhealthy days compared with male binge drinkers who consumed 5 drinks (Table 2).
Table 2.

Association Between Number of Unhealthy Days and Binge Drinking Intensity by Sex Among Binge Drinkers, 2008-2010a

Largest No. of Drinks Consumed on Any OccasionPhysically Unhealthy DaysMentally Unhealthy Days

Predicted Mean (95% CI)β (P Value)Predicted Mean (95% CI)β (P Value)
Women
42.6 (2.3-2.8)1 [Reference]4.6 (4.3-4.8)1 [Reference]
52.6 (2.3-2.8)−0.01 (.97)4.8 (4.4-5.2)0.24 (.22)
62.6 (2.3-2.9)0.02 (.89)5.2 (4.8-5.6)0.61 (.004)
≥73.0 (2.7-3.3)0.41 (.009)6.3 (5.8-6.7)1.69 (.001)
Men
52.1 (1.9-2.3)1 [Reference]2.9 (2.7-3.2)1 [Reference]
62.3 (2.1-2.6)0.19 (.10)3.1 (2.8-3.3)0.11 (.44)
72.1 (1.8-2.4)−0.04 (.78)2.8 (2.5-3.1)−0.16 (.36)
≥82.6 (2.4-2.7)0.42 (<.001)4.0 (3.7-4.2)1.01 (<.001)

Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.

Data from 50 states and Washington, DC, 2008-2010 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking defined as 4 or more drinks for women and 5 drinks or more drinks for men on an occasion. Sample size is 46,764 female binge drinkers and 63,223 male binge drinkers. Model adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, education, marital status, income, and employment.

In general, among all age groups for both sexes, the mean number of physically unhealthy days was associated with binge drinking intensity (Figure 1). The mean number of physically unhealthy days among both sexes aged 45 older was higher than for those aged 18 to 44. In general, among all age groups for both sexes, the mean number of mentally unhealthy days was associated with binge drinking intensity (Figure 2). The mean number of mentally unhealthy days among female binge drinkers was significantly higher than the mean number for male binge drinkers. We found no significant interactions between age and intensity of binge drinking in any of the linear regression models.
Figure 1.

Predicted mean number of physically unhealthy days by sex and age among binge drinkers, adjusted for race/ethnicity, education, marital status, income, employment, and survey year. Binge drinking is defined as 4 or more drinks for women and 5 drinks or more drinks for men on an occasion. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. Data are from 50 states and Washington, DC; Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2008-2010.

Figure 2.

Predicted mean number of mentally unhealthy days by sex and age among binge drinkers, adjusted for race/ethnicity, education, marital status, income, employment, and survey year. Binge drinking is defined as 4 or more drinks for women and 5 drinks or more drinks for men on an occasion. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. Data are from 50 states and Washington, DC; Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2008-2010.

Predicted mean number of physically unhealthy days by sex and age among binge drinkers, adjusted for race/ethnicity, education, marital status, income, employment, and survey year. Binge drinking is defined as 4 or more drinks for women and 5 drinks or more drinks for men on an occasion. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. Data are from 50 states and Washington, DC; Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2008-2010. Predicted mean number of mentally unhealthy days by sex and age among binge drinkers, adjusted for race/ethnicity, education, marital status, income, employment, and survey year. Binge drinking is defined as 4 or more drinks for women and 5 drinks or more drinks for men on an occasion. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. Data are from 50 states and Washington, DC; Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2008-2010.

Discussion

Although several studies have examined either sex-specific or alcohol-specific effects for HRQOL (13,19-21), this is the first study to examine the association between binge drinking intensity and HRQOL by sex. Adults who had high-intensity levels of binge drinking were more likely to report poor HRQOL than adults who had lower-intensity levels of binge drinking. This pattern was found for 2 measures of HRQOL — physically and mentally unhealthy days. Among female binge drinkers, the highest-intensity binge drinkers had 37% more mentally unhealthy days than the lowest-intensity binge drinkers. This estimate of 1 or 2 additional unhealthy days per month is considered a meaningful difference in HRQOL (22). We also found age effects for physically unhealthy days for both sexes; those aged 45 or older had significantly more physically unhealthy days than those aged 18 to 44. Age effects are likely due in part to the development of chronic conditions that increasingly affect health and well-being across the life span (23,24). The frequency and intensity of alcohol consumption are both important indicators for measuring and assessing the effect of binge drinking (5). A previous study found that poor HRQOL was associated with frequent binge drinking (13). Our study demonstrated that poor HRQOL (physically and mentally unhealthy days) was associated with the intensity of binge drinking among adults who reported binge drinking. This study has several limitations. First, BRFSS is a landline telephone survey; therefore, people with cellular telephones only or no landline telephones are excluded, which may result in sampling bias. Studies show that an increasing proportion of young adults aged 18 to 34 use cellular telephones exclusively (25) and that the prevalence of binge drinking is approximately one-third higher among cellular telephone users than landline respondents to the BRFSS (2). Second, BRFSS data are self-reported and may be subject to recall and social desirability biases (26). A recent study based on state alcohol sales found that BRFSS identifies only 22% to 32% of presumed alcohol consumption (27). Third, this study is cross-sectional; therefore, any cause and effect between poor HRQOL and level of binge drinking intensity cannot be inferred. Fourth, a previous study (13) demonstrated that the frequency of binge drinking was associated with HRQOL, whereas our study investigated the relationship between the intensity of binge drinking and HRQOL. Further studies are needed to explore the effects of both frequency and intensity of binge drinking on HRQOL to better understand sex-specific effects. This study also has several strengths. First, to our knowledge, it is the first study to assess the relationship between intensity of binge drinking and physical and mental health components of HRQOL. Second, the large sample of binge drinkers and the BRFSS sampling design suggest that these associations would be similar to those for all noninstitutionalized adult binge drinkers in the United States. The results of this study support the recommendations of the US Preventive Services Task Force (28) to implement screening and counseling for alcohol misuse, including binge drinking, among adults by physicians and other health care providers. Such screening and counseling can highlight the negative consequences of binge drinking on current physical and mental health. In addition, these results support the use of binge drinking intensity as a measure that could be monitored when implementing and evaluating evidence-based population-level intervention strategies, such as increasing alcohol excise taxes (29) and limiting the density of alcohol sales outlets (30) to reduce drinking intensity and improve HRQOL.
CharacteristicPredicted Mean Physically Unhealthy Days

4 drinks5 drinks6 drinks7 drinks (men), ≥7 drinks (women)≥8 drinks
Women aged 18-44 y2.41 (2.15-2.67)2.17 (1.91-2.44) 2.32 (2.04-2.60)2.68 (2.41-2.94)NA
Women aged ≥45 y3.06 (2.85-3.27)3.46 (3.00-3.92)3.17 (2.80-3.55)3.75 (3.25-4.25)NA
Men aged 18-44 yNA1.85 (1.65-2.06)2.07 (1.80-2.35)1.67 (1.39-1.96)2.13 (1.95-2.30)
Men aged  ≥45 yNA2.86 (2.64-3.07)2.89 (2.64-3.14)2.98 (2.51-3.45)3.55 (3.27-3.84)
CharacteristicPredicted Mean Mentally Unhealthy Days

4 drinks5 drinks6 drinks7 drinks (men),  ≥7 drinks (women)≥8 drinks
Women aged 18-44 y4.69 (4.37-5.01)4.96 (4.51-5.41)5.23 (4.77-5.68)6.44 (5.99-6.89)NA
Women aged ≥45 y4.22 (3.98-4.46)4.47 (4.05-4.89)5.14 (4.63-5.66)5.70 (5.13-6.28)NA
Men aged 18-44 yNA3.13 (2.80-3.46)3.20 (2.88-3.52)2.79 (2.44-3.14)4.08 (3.84-4.31)
Men aged ≥45 yNA2.58 (2.36-2.80)2.74 (2.48-3.00)2.84 (2.40-3.29)3.70 (3.40-4.00)
1. The activity supported the learning objectives.
Strongly Disagree   Strongly Agree
12345
2. The material was organized clearly for learning to occur.
Strongly Disagree   Strongly Agree
12345
3. The content learned from this activity will impact my practice.
Strongly Disagree   Strongly Agree
12345
4. The activity was presented objectively and free of commercial bias.
Strongly Disagree   Strongly Agree
12345
  26 in total

1.  Reliability and validity of measures from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS).

Authors:  D E Nelson; D Holtzman; J Bolen; C A Stanwyck; K A Mack
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  2001

2.  Public health surveillance for behavioral risk factors in a changing environment. Recommendations from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Team.

Authors:  Ali H Mokdad; Donna F Stroup; Wayne H Giles
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2003-05-23

3.  A comparison of national estimates from the National Health Interview Survey and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Authors:  David E Nelson; Eve Powell-Griner; Machell Town; Mary Grace Kovar
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The relationship between health-related quality of life and two measures of alcohol consumption.

Authors:  A Ph Van Dijk; J Toet; J E E Verdurmen
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2004-03

5.  Binge drinking and health-related quality of life: do popular perceptions match reality?

Authors:  Catherine A Okoro; Robert D Brewer; Timothy S Naimi; David G Moriarty; Wayne H Giles; Ali H Mokdad
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Race and gender associations between obesity and nine health-related quality-of-life measures.

Authors:  Tanya G K Bentley; Mari Palta; Adam J Paulsen; Dasha Cherepanov; Nancy Cross Dunham; David Feeny; Robert M Kaplan; Dennis G Fryback
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Validity of the US Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System's health related quality of life survey tool in a group of older Canadians.

Authors:  S Ounpuu; L W Chambers; D Chan; S Yusuf
Journal:  Chronic Dis Can       Date:  2001

8.  A population-based case-crossover and case-control study of alcohol and the risk of injury.

Authors:  Daniel C Vinson; Malcolm Maclure; Carol Reidinger; Gordon S Smith
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2003-05

9.  Binge drinking among US adults.

Authors:  Timothy S Naimi; Robert D Brewer; Ali Mokdad; Clark Denny; Mary K Serdula; James S Marks
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Health-related quality of life among adults with multiple chronic conditions in the United States, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2007.

Authors:  Han-Yang Chen; Dennis J Baumgardner; Jessica P Rice
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  14 in total

1.  Health-risk behaviors and quality of life among young men.

Authors:  Michelle Dey; Gerhard Gmel; Joseph Studer; Meichun Mohler-Kuo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Prevalence and correlates of binge drinking among older adults with multimorbidity.

Authors:  Benjamin H Han; Alison A Moore; Scott E Sherman; Joseph J Palamar
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-03-31       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  The association of alcohol use and quality of life in depressed and non-depressed individuals: a cross-sectional general population study.

Authors:  Jonna Levola; Tuuli Pitkänen; Olli Kampman; Mauri Aalto
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Altered oscillatory brain dynamics of emotional processing in young binge drinkers.

Authors:  Siyuan Huang; Lee A Holcomb; Stephen M Cruz; Ksenija Marinkovic
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 5.  Studying Sex Differences in Animal Models of Addiction: An Emphasis on Alcohol-Related Behaviors.

Authors:  Elisa R Hilderbrand; Amy W Lasek
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 4.418

6.  The Effect of a Patient-Provider Educational Intervention to Reduce At-Risk Drinking on Changes in Health and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Older Adults: The Project SHARE Study.

Authors:  Andrew J Barnes; Haiyong Xu; Chi-Hong Tseng; Alfonso Ang; Louise Tallen; Alison A Moore; Deborah C Marshall; Michelle Mirkin; Kurt Ransohoff; O Kenrik Duru; Susan L Ettner
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2015-07-08

7.  Models for count data with an application to Healthy Days measures: are you driving in screws with a hammer?

Authors:  Hong Zhou; Paul Z Siegel; John Barile; Rashid S Njai; William W Thompson; Charlotte Kent; Youlian Liao
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 2.830

8.  Estrogen Receptor α Regulates Ethanol Excitation of Ventral Tegmental Area Neurons and Binge Drinking in Female Mice.

Authors:  Bertha J Vandegrift; Elisa R Hilderbrand; Rosalba Satta; Rex Tai; Donghong He; Chang You; Hu Chen; Pingwen Xu; Cassandre Coles; Mark S Brodie; Amy W Lasek
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Reversed scototaxis during withdrawal after daily-moderate, but not weekly-binge, administration of ethanol in zebrafish.

Authors:  Adam Holcombe; Adam Howorko; Russell A Powell; Melike Schalomon; Trevor J Hamilton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Separate and Combined Effects of Anxiety, Depression and Problem Drinking on Subjective Health among Black, Hispanic and Non-Hispanic White Men.

Authors:  Shervin Assari
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2014-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.