Young-Ju Kim1. 1. College of Nursing, Sungshin Women's University, Seoul, Korea. yjkim727@sungshin.ac.kr
Abstract
AIM: This study reviews the historical development of injury severity scoring systems and their application to clinical practice. BACKGROUND: A variety of injury severity scoring systems have been developed and applied since more than four decades. It is increasingly important for nurses to be familiar with these scoring systems, their strengths and weaknesses, and their applications to nursing practice. DESIGN: Systematic literature review. METHODS: The injury severity scoring systems developed from the 1970s to 2011 were identified via electronic database searches, footnote chasing and contact with clinical experts. The most frequently used scoring systems in the literature were classified according to the criteria used in each scoring system. CONCLUSIONS: All injury severity scoring systems are valuable but have certain problems. A universal scoring system applicable for various purposes appears difficult to achieve. However, the understanding and proper use of scoring systems will allow us to perform critical evaluations and continual refinement of trauma management. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: As nurses and researchers, it is critical that we should know the application of these injury severity scoring systems to ensure their quality and appropriate utilization.
AIM: This study reviews the historical development of injury severity scoring systems and their application to clinical practice. BACKGROUND: A variety of injury severity scoring systems have been developed and applied since more than four decades. It is increasingly important for nurses to be familiar with these scoring systems, their strengths and weaknesses, and their applications to nursing practice. DESIGN: Systematic literature review. METHODS: The injury severity scoring systems developed from the 1970s to 2011 were identified via electronic database searches, footnote chasing and contact with clinical experts. The most frequently used scoring systems in the literature were classified according to the criteria used in each scoring system. CONCLUSIONS: All injury severity scoring systems are valuable but have certain problems. A universal scoring system applicable for various purposes appears difficult to achieve. However, the understanding and proper use of scoring systems will allow us to perform critical evaluations and continual refinement of trauma management. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: As nurses and researchers, it is critical that we should know the application of these injury severity scoring systems to ensure their quality and appropriate utilization.
Authors: Carlos Oliver Valderrama-Molina; Nelson Giraldo; Alfredo Constain; Andres Puerta; Camilo Restrepo; Alba León; Fabián Jaimes Journal: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Date: 2016-12-20
Authors: Morgan Thorn Yates; Takuro Ishikawa; Amy Schneeberg; Mariana Brussoni Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Valentina Ferro; Raffaella Nacca; Mara Pisani; Sebastian Cristaldi; Maria Francesca Faa; Maria Chiara Supino; Umberto Raucci; Antonino Reale; Marta Ciofi Degli Atti; Massimiliano Raponi; Alberto Villani; Anna Maria Musolino Journal: Ital J Pediatr Date: 2022-07-27 Impact factor: 3.288
Authors: Mostafa A Abolfotouh; Mohamed A Hussein; Sameh M Abolfotouh; Alanoud Al-Marzoug; Suliman Al-Teriqi; Abeer Al-Suwailem; Ra'ed A Hijazi Journal: Open Access Emerg Med Date: 2018-07-31