BACKGROUND: Single-stage reconstruction using permanent expander implants is an established technique following mastectomy. Short and long-term outcome data following breast reconstruction using Becker tissue expanders is limited. METHOD: A retrospective case note review of patients undergoing expander-based procedures between 1989 and 2007 was undertaken. Data recorded included postoperative symptoms and complications, the use of radiotherapy, revisional surgery, and device failure. RESULTS: Three hundred and thirteen expanders were used in 276 patients with a mean age of 48.3 (17-78) years, over the 18 year study period. The mean follow up period was 64.6 (1-199) months. 256 Becker expanders were used during 175 latissimus dorsi (LD) and 52 subpectoral (SP) reconstructions, 13 contralateral augmentations and 16 implant replacements. The postoperative infection rate was 5.8%, leading to an expander loss rate of 3.8%. The use of prophylactic antibiotics was associated with an increased postoperative infection rate (p = 0.046). Six haematomas (2.5%) and 12 cases of skin envelope necrosis (5.0%) required unscheduled intervention. Symptoms of pain, distortion and hardness were experienced by 21.3% of patients, and radiotherapy was associated with a significantly higher risk of adverse symptoms (p < 0.0001). No patient developed symptomatic implant rupture or silicone granuloma but 17.9% of reconstructions underwent revisional surgery, the rate being highest following SP reconstruction (p = 0.029). Nine patients developed injection port complications (3.8%), and the overall device failure rate was 1.3%. The original expander has been retained by 74.2% of women. CONCLUSION: The Becker permanent expander is a reliable implant associated with a low complication rate and a high retention rate when used during breast reconstruction.
BACKGROUND: Single-stage reconstruction using permanent expander implants is an established technique following mastectomy. Short and long-term outcome data following breast reconstruction using Becker tissue expanders is limited. METHOD: A retrospective case note review of patients undergoing expander-based procedures between 1989 and 2007 was undertaken. Data recorded included postoperative symptoms and complications, the use of radiotherapy, revisional surgery, and device failure. RESULTS: Three hundred and thirteen expanders were used in 276 patients with a mean age of 48.3 (17-78) years, over the 18 year study period. The mean follow up period was 64.6 (1-199) months. 256 Becker expanders were used during 175 latissimus dorsi (LD) and 52 subpectoral (SP) reconstructions, 13 contralateral augmentations and 16 implant replacements. The postoperative infection rate was 5.8%, leading to an expander loss rate of 3.8%. The use of prophylactic antibiotics was associated with an increased postoperative infection rate (p = 0.046). Six haematomas (2.5%) and 12 cases of skin envelope necrosis (5.0%) required unscheduled intervention. Symptoms of pain, distortion and hardness were experienced by 21.3% of patients, and radiotherapy was associated with a significantly higher risk of adverse symptoms (p < 0.0001). No patient developed symptomatic implant rupture or siliconegranuloma but 17.9% of reconstructions underwent revisional surgery, the rate being highest following SP reconstruction (p = 0.029). Nine patients developed injection port complications (3.8%), and the overall device failure rate was 1.3%. The original expander has been retained by 74.2% of women. CONCLUSION: The Becker permanent expander is a reliable implant associated with a low complication rate and a high retention rate when used during breast reconstruction.
Authors: Marco Gardani; Nicolò Bertozzi; Michele Pio Grieco; Marianna Pesce; Francesco Simonacci; PierLuigi Santi; Edoardo Raposio Journal: Ann Med Surg (Lond) Date: 2017-07-20