Literature DB >> 22497629

Comparison of SNPs and microsatellites for assessing the genetic structure of chicken populations.

C Gärke1, F Ytournel, B Bed'hom, I Gut, M Lathrop, S Weigend, H Simianer.   

Abstract

Many studies in human genetics compare informativeness of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and microsatellites (single sequence repeats; SSR) in genome scans, but it is difficult to transfer the results directly to livestock because of different population structures. The aim of this study was to determine the number of SNPs needed to obtain the same differentiation power as with a given standard set of microsatellites. Eight chicken breeds were genotyped for 29 SSRs and 9216 SNPs. After filtering, only 2931 SNPs remained. The differentiation power was evaluated using two methods: partitioning of the Euclidean distance matrix based on a principal component analysis (PCA) and a Bayesian model-based clustering approach. Generally, with PCA-based partitioning, 70 SNPs provide a comparable resolution to 29 SSRs. In model-based clustering, the similarity coefficient showed significantly higher values between repeated runs for SNPs compared to SSRs. For the membership coefficients, reflecting the proportion to which a fraction segment of the genome belongs to the ith cluster, the highest values were obtained for 29 SSRs and 100 SNPs respectively. With a low number of loci (29 SSRs or ≤100 SNPs), neither marker types could detect the admixture in the Gödöllö Nhx population. Using more than 250 SNPs allowed a more detailed insight into the genetic architecture. Thus, the admixed population could be detected. It is concluded that breed differentiation studies will substantially gain power even with moderate numbers of SNPs.
© 2011 The Authors, Animal Genetics © 2011 Stichting International Foundation for Animal Genetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22497629     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02284.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Genet        ISSN: 0268-9146            Impact factor:   3.169


  27 in total

1.  Population genetic inferences using immune gene SNPs mirror patterns inferred by microsatellites.

Authors:  Jean P Elbers; Rachel W Clostio; Sabrina S Taylor
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 7.090

2.  Genomic diversity and population structure of three autochthonous Greek sheep breeds assessed with genome-wide DNA arrays.

Authors:  S Michailidou; G Tsangaris; G C Fthenakis; A Tzora; I Skoufos; S C Karkabounas; G Banos; A Argiriou; G Arsenos
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 3.291

3.  Toward a genome-wide approach for detecting hybrids: informative SNPs to detect introgression between domestic cats and European wildcats (Felis silvestris).

Authors:  R Oliveira; E Randi; F Mattucci; J D Kurushima; L A Lyons; P C Alves
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Diversity and evolution of the highly polymorphic tandem repeat LEI0258 in the chicken MHC-B region.

Authors:  Olympe Chazara; Chi-Sheng Chang; Nicolas Bruneau; Khalid Benabdeljelil; Jean-Claude Fotsa; Boniface B Kayang; N'Goran E Loukou; Richard Osei-Amponsah; Valentine Yapi-Gnaore; Issaka A K Youssao; Chih-Feng Chen; Marie-Hélène Pinard-van der Laan; Michèle Tixier-Boichard; Bertrand Bed'hom
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.846

5.  The relative contribution of natural landscapes and human-mediated factors on the connectivity of a noxious invasive weed.

Authors:  Diego F Alvarado-Serrano; Megan L Van Etten; Shu-Mei Chang; Regina S Baucom
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Trypanosomosis: potential driver of selection in African cattle.

Authors:  Anamarija Smetko; Albert Soudre; Katja Silbermayr; Simone Müller; Gottfried Brem; Olivier Hanotte; Paul J Boettcher; Alessandra Stella; Gábor Mészáros; Maria Wurzinger; Ino Curik; Mathias Müller; Jörg Burgstaller; Johann Sölkner
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 7.  Challenges in analysis and interpretation of microsatellite data for population genetic studies.

Authors:  Alexander I Putman; Ignazio Carbone
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Genome wide characterization of simple sequence repeats in watermelon genome and their application in comparative mapping and genetic diversity analysis.

Authors:  Huayu Zhu; Pengyao Song; Dal-Hoe Koo; Luqin Guo; Yanman Li; Shouru Sun; Yiqun Weng; Luming Yang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  High-utility conserved avian microsatellite markers enable parentage and population studies across a wide range of species.

Authors:  Deborah A Dawson; Alexander D Ball; Lewis G Spurgin; David Martín-Gálvez; Ian R K Stewart; Gavin J Horsburgh; Jonathan Potter; Mercedes Molina-Morales; Anthony W J Bicknell; Stephanie A J Preston; Robert Ekblom; Jon Slate; Terry Burke
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Conserved microsatellites in ants enable population genetic and colony pedigree studies across a wide range of species.

Authors:  Ian A Butler; Kimberly Siletti; Peter R Oxley; Daniel J C Kronauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.