Literature DB >> 22497416

Phylogenetic and ecological factors influencing the number and distribution of electroreceptors in elasmobranchs.

R M Kempster1, I D McCarthy, S P Collin.   

Abstract

Electroreception is found throughout the animal kingdom from invertebrates to mammals and has been shown to play an important role in prey detection, facilitating social behaviours, the detection of predators and orientation to the earth's magnetic field for navigation. Electroreceptors in elasmobranchs, the ampullae of Lorenzini, detect minute electric fields and independently process these stimuli, thereby providing spatial information to the central nervous system on the location of a source, often potential prey. The ampullae of Lorenzini are individually connected to a single somatic pore on the surface of the skin, with the spatial separation of each pore directly influencing how electrical stimuli are detected and processed. Pore abundance varies across taxonomic groups resulting in unique species-specific differences. The intricate distribution patterns created by the specific positioning of somatic pores on the head are, however, consistent within families, resulting in patterns that are identifiable at higher taxonomic levels. As elasmobranchs evolved, the electrosensory system became more complex and highly specialized, which is evident by a general trend of increasing pore abundance over time. The elasmobranch electrosensory system has evolved to operate efficiently under the environmental conditions of the particular habitat in which a species lives. For example, reduced pore abundance is evident in oceanic pelagic elasmobranchs, for whom visual cues are thought to be of great importance. Pore abundance and spatial distribution may be influenced by multiple factors including head morphology, phylogeny, feeding behaviour and habitat.
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Fish Biology © 2012 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22497416     DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2011.03214.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fish Biol        ISSN: 0022-1112            Impact factor:   2.051


  8 in total

1.  Sixth sense in the deep-sea: the electrosensory system in ghost shark Chimaera monstrosa.

Authors:  Massimiliano Bottaro
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  The coelacanth rostral organ is a unique low-resolution electro-detector that facilitates the feeding strike.

Authors:  Rachel M Berquist; Vitaly L Galinsky; Stephen M Kajiura; Lawrence R Frank
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Evolutionary trends of the conserved neurocranium shape in angel sharks (Squatiniformes, Elasmobranchii).

Authors:  Faviel A López-Romero; Sebastian Stumpf; Cathrin Pfaff; Giuseppe Marramà; Zerina Johanson; Jürgen Kriwet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Differential root and shoot magnetoresponses in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Ivan A Paponov; Judith Fliegmann; Ravishankar Narayana; Massimo E Maffei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The Geomagnetic Field (GMF) Modulates Nutrient Status and Lipid Metabolism during Arabidopsis thaliana Plant Development.

Authors:  Monirul Islam; Gianpiero Vigani; Massimo E Maffei
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-08

6.  Survival of the stillest: predator avoidance in shark embryos.

Authors:  Ryan M Kempster; Nathan S Hart; Shaun P Collin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Electroreceptive and mechanoreceptive anatomical specialisations in the epaulette shark (Hemiscyllium ocellatum).

Authors:  Marit Winther-Janson; Barbara E Wueringer; Jamie E Seymour
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Variable response to electric shark deterrents in bull sharks, Carcharhinus leucas.

Authors:  A R G Gauthier; E Chateauminois; M G Hoarau; J Gadenne; E Hoarau; S Jaquemet; S K Whitmarsh; C Huveneers
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.