Literature DB >> 22497409

Recovery potential and conservation options for elasmobranchs.

C A Ward-Paige1, D M Keith, B Worm, H K Lotze.   

Abstract

Many elasmobranchs have experienced strong population declines, which have been largely attributed to the direct and indirect effects of exploitation. Recently, however, live elasmobranchs are being increasingly valued for their role in marine ecosystems, dive tourism and intrinsic worth. Thus, management plans have been implemented to slow and ultimately reverse negative trends, including shark-specific (e.g. anti-finning laws) to ecosystem-based (e.g. no-take marine reserves) strategies. Yet it is unclear how successful these measures are, or will be, given the degree of depletion and slow recovery potential of most elasmobranchs. Here, current understanding of elasmobranch population recoveries is reviewed. The potential and realized extent of population increases, including rates of increase, timelines and drivers are evaluated. Across 40 increasing populations, only 25% were attributed to decreased anthropogenic mortality, while the majority was attributed to predation release. It is also shown that even low exploitation rates (2-6% per year) can halt or reverse positive population trends in six populations currently managed under recovery plans. Management measures that help restore elasmobranch populations include enforcement or near-zero fishing mortality, protection of critical habitats, monitoring and education. These measures are highlighted in a case study from the south-eastern U.S.A., where some evidence of recovery is seen in Pristis pectinata, Galeocerdo cuvier and Sphyrna lewini populations. It is concluded that recovery of elasmobranchs is certainly possible but requires time and a combination of strong and dedicated management actions to be successful.
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Fish Biology © 2012 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22497409     DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03246.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fish Biol        ISSN: 0022-1112            Impact factor:   2.051


  16 in total

Review 1.  Shark recreational fisheries: Status, challenges, and research needs.

Authors:  Austin J Gallagher; Neil Hammerschlag; Andy J Danylchuk; Steven J Cooke
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  Spatial heterogeneity in fishing creates de facto refugia for endangered Celtic Sea elasmobranchs.

Authors:  Samuel Shephard; Hans Gerritsen; Michel J Kaiser; David G Reid
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Modeling the population dynamics of lemon sharks.

Authors:  Easton R White; John D Nagy; Samuel H Gruber
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 4.540

4.  Feeding requirements of white sharks may be higher than originally thought.

Authors:  J M Semmens; N L Payne; C Huveneers; D W Sims; B D Bruce
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Long-term change in a meso-predator community in response to prolonged and heterogeneous human impact.

Authors:  Francesco Ferretti; Giacomo C Osio; Chris J Jenkins; Andrew A Rosenberg; Heike K Lotze
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Genetic network and breeding patterns of a sicklefin lemon shark (Negaprion acutidens) population in the Society Islands, French Polynesia.

Authors:  Johann Mourier; Nicolas Buray; Jennifer K Schultz; Eric Clua; Serge Planes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Residency, habitat use and sexual segregation of white sharks, Carcharodon carcharias in False Bay, South Africa.

Authors:  Alison Kock; M Justin O'Riain; Katya Mauff; Michael Meÿer; Deon Kotze; Charles Griffiths
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Global population trends and human use patterns of Manta and Mobula rays.

Authors:  Christine A Ward-Paige; Brendal Davis; Boris Worm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Prey Density Threshold and Tidal Influence on Reef Manta Ray Foraging at an Aggregation Site on the Great Barrier Reef.

Authors:  Asia O Armstrong; Amelia J Armstrong; Fabrice R A Jaine; Lydie I E Couturier; Kym Fiora; Julian Uribe-Palomino; Scarla J Weeks; Kathy A Townsend; Mike B Bennett; Anthony J Richardson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Will ocean acidification affect the early ontogeny of a tropical oviparous elasmobranch (Hemiscyllium ocellatum)?

Authors:  Martijn S Johnson; Daniel W Kraver; Gillian M C Renshaw; Jodie L Rummer
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 3.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.