Literature DB >> 22497402

A global review of species-specific shark-fin-to-body-mass ratios and relevant legislation.

L Biery1, D Pauly.   

Abstract

In this review, shark-fin-to-body-mass ratios, which have been legislated by several countries as a means of regulating and monitoring shark fisheries, have been compiled and reviewed. Observed and legislated wet-fin-mass-to-round-mass (M(fw) :M(r) ) ratios have been collected for 50 species and eight countries. Wet to dry-fin mass conversion factors have also been reviewed. Existing shark fishery legislation was compiled by political entity and regional fishery management organizations (RFMO). The mean observed M(fw) :M(r) ratio for all species was 3·0%, but actual fin to body-mass ratios varied considerably by species and location. Species-specific mean ratios ranged from 1·1 to 10·9%, and estimated mean ratios ranged from 1·5 to 6·1% by country, depending on fin-cutting practices and the mix of exploited species. The mean conversion factor for wet to dry-fin mass was 0·43. Shark-related legislation was found to exist in 37 countries and the 22 maritime members of the European Union, and shark-related regulations have been designated by nine RFMOs. Results suggest that currently regulated ratios may not be appropriate for all species and fin-cutting practices, and regulations based on generalized ratios for all sharks may be inadequate. Alternative policies may be necessary for the effective management of global shark fisheries.
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Fish Biology © 2012 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22497402     DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2011.03215.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fish Biol        ISSN: 0022-1112            Impact factor:   2.051


  2 in total

1.  Ethnotaxonomy of sharks from tropical waters of Brazil.

Authors:  Marcelo Moreira de Carvalho; Mônica Rocha de Oliveira; Priscila Fabiana Macedo Lopes; Jorge Eduardo Lins Oliveira
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 2.733

2.  International socioeconomic inequality drives trade patterns in the global wildlife market.

Authors:  Jia Huan Liew; Zi Yi Kho; Rayson Bock Hing Lim; Caroline Dingle; Timothy Carlton Bonebrake; Yik Hei Sung; David Dudgeon
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 14.136

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.