Literature DB >> 22496436

Rotationally asymmetric multifocal IOL implantation with and without capsular tension ring: refractive and visual outcomes and intraocular optical performance.

Jorge L Alió1, Ana B Plaza-Puche, David P Piñero.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To ascertain whether the refractive, visual, and intraocular optical quality outcomes of a rotationally asymmetric multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) are enhanced by the use of a capsular tension ring.
METHODS: Ninety consecutive eyes from 53 patients (age range: 36 to 82 years) were divided into two groups: the no ring group comprised 43 eyes implanted with the multifocal rotationally asymmetric Lentis Mplus LS-312 (Oculentis GmbH) without a capsular tension ring; and the ring group comprised 47 eyes with the same IOL with a capsular tension ring. Distance and near visual acuity and refractive outcomes were evaluated pre- and postoperatively. Contrast sensitivity, intraocular aberrations, and defocus curve were evaluated postoperatively.
RESULTS: Significant postoperative differences between groups were found in sphere, spherical equivalent refraction, and near addition (P<.02). Regarding defocus curve, significantly better visual acuity was present in eyes with the capsular tension ring for intermediate vision conditions (P<.05). Intraocular aberrometry did not differ significantly between groups (P<.09).
CONCLUSIONS: Refractive predictability and intermediate visual outcomes with the Lentis Mplus LS-312 IOL improved significantly when implanted in combination with a capsular tension ring. Copyright 2012, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22496436     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20120314-01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  10 in total

1.  Presbyopic lens exchange (PRELEX) cataract surgery outcomes with implantation of a rotationally asymmetric refractive multifocal intraocular lens: femtosecond laser-assisted versus manual phacoemulsification.

Authors:  Peter Žiak; Juraj Halička; Peter Mojžiš; Karolína Kapitánová; Javorka Michal; David P Piñero
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Visual outcomes of multifocal intraocular lens implantation in patients with cataract and high hyperopia and patient selection.

Authors:  Servet Cetinkaya; Zeynep Dadaci; Nursen Oncel Acir; Yasemin Fatma Cetinkaya; Halil Ibrahim Yener; Muammer Ozcimen
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 3.  Optimizing outcomes with multifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Gitansha Shreyas Sachdev; Mahipal Sachdev
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  In Vitro Aberrometric Assessment of a Multifocal Intraocular Lens and Two Extended Depth of Focus IOLs.

Authors:  Vicente J Camps; Angel Tolosa; David P Piñero; Dolores de Fez; María T Caballero; Juan J Miret
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  How to Manage the Cortex After CTR Insertion.

Authors:  Kazuki Matsuura; Teruyuki Miyoshi; Hironori Yoshida; Takahiro Shimowake
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-08

6.  Comparison of a hydrophilic and a hydrophobic apodized diffractive multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Jan Willem van der Linden; Ivanka J van der Meulen; Maarten P Mourits; Ruth Lapid-Gortzak
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 7.  Correction of presbyopia: An integrated update for the practical surgeon.

Authors:  Marie Joan Therese D Balgos; Veronica Vargas; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Taiwan J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

Review 8.  Comparison of the Clinical Performance of Refractive Rotationally Asymmetric Multifocal IOLs with Other Types of IOLs: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zequan Xu; Wenzhe Li; Lianqun Wu; Shuang Xue; Xu Chen; Qiang Wu
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 1.909

9.  Effects of capsular tension ring on surgical outcomes of premium intraocular lens in patients with suspected zonular weakness.

Authors:  Teruyuki Miyoshi; Shuhei Fujie; Hironori Yoshida; Hiroshi Iwamoto; Hideki Tsukamoto; Tetsuro Oshika
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparing prediction accuracy between total keratometry and conventional keratometry in cataract surgery with refractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Ho Seok Chung; Jae Lim Chung; Young Jun Kim; Hun Lee; Jae Yong Kim; Hungwon Tchah
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.