Literature DB >> 22495905

Prenatal diagnosis of cardiac defects: accuracy and benefit.

S A Clur1, P M Van Brussel, J Ottenkamp, C M Bilardo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The prenatal diagnosis of cardiac defects can potentially reduce postnatal morbidity and mortality. We wanted to evaluate prenatal cardiac diagnosis accuracy in a population referred for echocardiography.
METHODS: Single centre retrospective study of echocardiography referrals between April 1999 and December 2008. We compared the prenatal and postnatal cardiac diagnoses, the modified Aristotle and Wald scores. The final diagnosis Wald score was used to evaluate benefit.
RESULTS: Six hundred fetuses were included. Diagnoses included: normal heart (312, 52%); congenital heart defect (CHD) (231, 38.5%); primary arrhythmia (39, 6.5%); or cardiomyopathy, myocarditis or cardiac tumor (18, 3%). The prenatal and postnatal Aristotle and Wald scores correlated in 81% and 86%, respectively, each with significant differences in 22 cases. Four significant CHDs were misdiagnosed, the surgical prediction was incorrect in 7 and 13 false positive diagnoses of aortic coarctation were made. In 76% (455/600) fetuses prenatal diagnosis was considered beneficial. The average CHD Aristotle score was 9.5 ± 5.0. In babies with CHDs and normal karyotype the score was either 6.5 ± 5.0, 12.9 ± 3.1 or 13.2 ± 2.9, in survivors, cases of postnatal demise and cases of pregnancy termination, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Prenatal diagnosis was accurate and the counselling appropriate in most cases; however, a few errors were made. The diagnosis of aortic coarctation remains challenging.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22495905     DOI: 10.1002/pd.3837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  6 in total

1.  Cardiovascular cast model fabrication and casting effectiveness evaluation in fetus with severe congenital heart disease or normal heart.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Hai-Yan Cao; Ming-Xing Xie; Lin He; Wei Han; Liu Hong; Yuan Peng; Yun-Fei Hu; Ben-Cai Song; Jing Wang; Bin Wang; Cheng Deng
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2016-04-13

2.  Morphological features of complex congenital cardiovascular anomalies in fetuses: as evaluated by cast models.

Authors:  Hai-Yan Cao; Yu Wang; Liu Hong; Wei Han; Lin He; Ben-Cai Song; Yun-Fei Hu; Yuan Peng; Bin Wang; Jing Wang; Wen-Ying Huang; Jing Deng; Ming-Xing Xie
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2017-08-08

3.  A population-based study of the association of prenatal diagnosis with survival rate for infants with congenital heart defects.

Authors:  Matthew E Oster; Christopher H Kim; Aaron S Kusano; Janet D Cragan; Paul Dressler; Alice R Hales; William T Mahle; Adolfo Correa
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Why are congenital heart defects being missed?

Authors:  A E L van Nisselrooij; A K K Teunissen; S A Clur; L Rozendaal; E Pajkrt; I H Linskens; L Rammeloo; J M M van Lith; N A Blom; M C Haak
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 7.299

5.  Comparison of the 1-year survival rate in infants with congenital heart disease diagnosed by prenatal and postnatal ultrasound: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Bing Han; Yi Tang; Xueling Qu; Chuanjun Deng; Xing Wang; Jie Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  False positive morphologic diagnoses at the anomaly scan: marginal or real problem, a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Anne Debost-Legrand; Hélène Laurichesse-Delmas; Christine Francannet; Isabelle Perthus; Didier Lémery; Denis Gallot; Françoise Vendittelli
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 3.007

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.