Literature DB >> 22495512

A cross-sectional exploration of smoking status and social interaction in a large population-based Australian cohort.

May Chiew1, Marianne F Weber, Sam Egger, Freddy Sitas.   

Abstract

We used cross-sectional data to investigate whether current, past and never smokers report different levels of social interaction and whether the level of social interaction varied according to the type of interaction being measured. Self-reported questionnaire data were obtained from 239,043 men and women aged 45 years or older living in Australia between February 2006 and February 2010. The study participation rate was 18%. Poisson regression models were used to estimate the percentage differences in the mean values of four social interaction outcomes according to smoking status after adjusting for age, place of residence, income, education, health insurance status, physical limitation, psychological distress and exposure to passive smoke: number of times 1) spent with friends/family, 2) spoken on the telephone, 3) attended social meetings in the past week, and 4) number of people outside of home that can be depended upon. 7.6% of males and 6.9% of females were current smokers, 43.6% of males and 28.6% of females were ex-smokers and 48.8% of males and 64.5% of females had never smoked. Compared to never smokers, current smokers reported significantly fewer social interactions in the past week and had fewer people outside the home that they could depend on. Men and women current smokers attended 24.0% (95% CI, 20.3, 27.5) and 31.1% (95% CI, 28.1, 34.1) fewer social group meetings on average than never smokers. Smokers exposed to passive smoke reported higher levels of social interaction than those not exposed. Past smokers reported levels of social interaction that were intermediate to those of current and never smokers and the more years they had abstained from smoking, the more social interaction they reported on average. Our data are in line with previous research showing that smokers are not only worse off economically, physically and mentally, but are also less likely to be socially connected.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22495512     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  3 in total

Review 1.  A review of the effects of nicotine on social functioning.

Authors:  Lea M Martin; Michael A Sayette
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  The long-term effects of occupational exposure to vinyl chloride monomer on microcirculation: a cross-sectional study 15 years after retirement.

Authors:  Vincent Lopez; Alain Chamoux; Marion Tempier; Hélène Thiel; Sylvie Ughetto; Marion Trousselard; Geraldine Naughton; Frédéric Dutheil
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Do social interactions explain ethnic differences in psychological distress and the protective effect of local ethnic density? A cross-sectional study of 226 487 adults in Australia.

Authors:  Xiaoqi Feng; Thomas Astell-Burt; Gregory S Kolt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.