Literature DB >> 22495017

Carbon storage and fluxes in existing and newly created urban soils.

Luke Beesley1.   

Abstract

Carbon storage (carbon density; kg C m(2)), concentrations of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in soil pore water and soil respiration (g C m(2) yr(-1)) were measured in a 35 year old urban lawn soil amended with a surface mulch application of green waste compost and compared to those in two newly created urban soils, manufactured by mixing different volumes of green waste compost with existing soils or soil forming materials. The aim was to determine C storage and calculate annual fluxes in two newly created urban soils compared to an existing urban soil, to establish the potential for maintaining and building carbon storage. In the lawn soil, organic carbon storage was largely limited to the upper 15 cm of the soil, with material below 30 cm consisting of substantial amounts of alkaline building debris augmenting sandstone parent material. Leaching of DOC directly from the surface applied compost mulch amendment was readily mobile within the upper 15 cm of soil beneath, but not to 30 cm depth, indicating limited vertical redistribution of the soluble organic C fraction to the deeper, technic horizons. Only a very small proportion of annual C losses were attributable to DOC export (≤ 0.5%) whilst a much greater amount was accounted for by soil respiration (∼20%). In the two newly created urban soils, ≤ 30% additions of compost mixed with existing soil forming materials trebled C densities from <2 to 6 kg total carbon (TC) m(2), surpassing those of the existing lawn soil (≤ 5 kg TC m(2)). Adding 45% compost served only to reduce bulk density so that C densities did not increase further until >50% compost was applied. Combined increases in soil respiration losses and DOC leaching associated with higher compost application rates suggested that volumes of ∼30% compost were altogether optimal for sustainable C storage whilst minimising annual losses. Thus repeated applications of small amounts, rather than single applications of large amounts of green waste compost could be most effective at maintaining and building C storage in urban soils.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22495017     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.03.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  4 in total

1.  Chemometric evaluation of heavy metal pollutions in Patna region of the Ganges alluvial plain, India: implication for source apportionment and health risk assessment.

Authors:  Ningombam Linthoingambi Devi; Ishwar Chandra Yadav
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Density and stability of soil organic carbon beneath impervious surfaces in urban areas.

Authors:  Zongqiang Wei; Shaohua Wu; Xiao Yan; Shenglu Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Building houses and managing lawns could limit yard soil carbon for centuries.

Authors:  Morgan E Peach; Laura A Ogden; Eleni A Mora; Andrew J Friedland
Journal:  Carbon Balance Manag       Date:  2019-08-16

Review 4.  Carbon Sequestration in Turfgrass-Soil Systems.

Authors:  Ruying Wang; Clint M Mattox; Claire L Phillips; Alec R Kowalewski
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.