Literature DB >> 22494955

Prediction of potential for organ donation after cardiac death in patients in neurocritical state: a prospective observational study.

Alejandro A Rabinstein1, Alan H Yee, Jay Mandrekar, Jennifer E Fugate, Yorick J de Groot, Erwin J O Kompanje, Lori A Shutter, W David Freeman, Michael A Rubin, Eelco F M Wijdicks.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Successful donation of organs after cardiac death (DCD) requires identification of patients who will die within 60 min of withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (WLST). We aimed to validate a straightforward model to predict the likelihood of death within 60 min of WLST in patients with irreversible brain injury.
METHODS: In this multicentre, observational study, we prospectively enrolled consecutive comatose patients with irreversible brain injury undergoing WLST at six medical centres in the USA and the Netherlands. We assessed four clinical characteristics (corneal reflex, cough reflex, best motor response, and oxygenation index) as predictor variables, which were selected on the basis of previous findings. We excluded patients who had brain death or were not intubated. The primary endpoint was death within 60 min of WLST. We used univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses to assess associations with predictor variables. Points attributed to each variable were summed to create a predictive score for cardiac death in patients in neurocritical state (the DCD-N score). We assessed performance of the score using area under the curve analysis.
FINDINGS: We included 178 patients, 82 (46%) of whom died within 60 min of WLST. Absent corneal reflexes (odds ratio [OR] 2·67, 95% CI 1·19-6·01; p=0·0173; 1 point), absent cough reflex (4·16, 1·79-9·70; p=0·0009; 2 points), extensor or absent motor responses (2·99, 1·22-7·34; p=0·0168; 1 point), and an oxygenation index score of more than 3·0 (2·31, 1·10-4·88; p=0·0276; 1 point) were predictive of death within 60 min of WLST. 59 of 82 patients who died within 60 min of WLST had DCD-N scores of 3 or more (72% sensitivity), and 75 of 96 of those who did not die within this interval had scores of 0-2 (78% specificity); taking into account the prevalence of death within 60 min in this population, a score of 3 or more was translated into a 74% chance of death within 60 min (positive predictive value) and a score of 0-2 translated into a 77% chance of survival beyond 60 min (negative predictive value).
INTERPRETATION: The DCD-N score can be used to predict potential candidates for DCD in patients with non-survivable brain injury. However, this score needs to be tested specifically in a cohort of potential donors participating in DCD protocols. FUNDING: None.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22494955     DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70060-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Neurol        ISSN: 1474-4422            Impact factor:   44.182


  19 in total

1.  Transplantation: The DCD-N score could identify potential DCD donors.

Authors:  Katherine Smith
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 28.314

2.  Neurocritical care: divining death: do we have the right tools for the job?

Authors:  Matthew R Hallman; Michael J Souter
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 42.937

3.  'In plain language': uniform criteria for organ donor recognition.

Authors:  Erwin J O Kompanje; Nichon E Jansen; Yorick J de Groot
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Integrating Palliative Care Into the Care of Neurocritically Ill Patients: A Report From the Improving Palliative Care in the ICU Project Advisory Board and the Center to Advance Palliative Care.

Authors:  Jennifer A Frontera; J Randall Curtis; Judith E Nelson; Margaret Campbell; Michelle Gabriel; Anne C Mosenthal; Colleen Mulkerin; Kathleen A Puntillo; Daniel E Ray; Rick Bassett; Renee D Boss; Dana R Lustbader; Karen J Brasel; Stefanie P Weiss; David E Weissman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 5.  A few realistic questions raised by organ retrieval in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Olivier Lesieur; Liliane Genteuil; Maxime Leloup
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-12

Review 6.  Predicting time to death after withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy.

Authors:  Laveena Munshi; Sonny Dhanani; Sam D Shemie; Laura Hornby; Genevieve Gore; Jason Shahin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  ICU Management of the Potential Organ Donor: State of the Art.

Authors:  Carolina B Maciel; David M Greer
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 5.081

8.  Eligibility for organ donation following end-of-life decisions: a study performed in 43 French intensive care units.

Authors:  Olivier Lesieur; Maxime Leloup; Frédéric Gonzalez; Marie-France Mamzer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  The incidence of potential missed organ donors in intensive care units and emergency rooms: a retrospective cohort.

Authors:  Demetrios J Kutsogiannis; Sonal Asthana; Derek R Townsend; Gurmeet Singh; Constantine J Karvellas
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  [How many potential organ donors are there really? : Retrospective analysis of why determination of irreversible loss of brain function was not performed in deceased patients with relevant brain damage].

Authors:  M Brauer; A Günther; K Pleul; M Götze; C Wachsmuth; T Meinig; M Bauer; O W Witte; A Rahmel
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 1.041

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.