Literature DB >> 22494906

The association between submission counts to a veterinary diagnostic laboratory and the economic and disease challenges of the Ontario swine industry from 1998 to 2009.

T O'Sullivan1, R Friendship, D L Pearl, B McEwen, A Ker, C Dewey.   

Abstract

An intuitive assumption is to believe that the number of submissions made to a veterinary diagnostic laboratory is dictated by the financial state of the industries using the laboratory. However, no research is available to document how the economics of a food animal industry affects laboratory submissions and therefore disease monitoring and surveillance efforts. The objective of this study was to determine if economic indices associated with the Ontario swine industry can account for the variability seen in these submissions. Retrospective swine submissions made to the Animal Health Laboratory at the University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario from January 1998 to July 2009 were compiled. The following economic, demographic, and health variables impacting Ontario swine production were selected for analysis: auction price, lean-hog futures, currency exchange rate, price of corn, an outbreak of porcine circovirus type-2 associated diseases (PCVAD), government incentive program, number of farms in province, and average farm size. All independent variables identified by unconditional associations to have a significance of P≤0.2 with the outcome of monthly submission count were included in a multivariable negative binomial model. A final model was identified by a backwards elimination procedure. A total of 30,432 swine submissions were recorded. The mean frequency of monthly submissions over 139 months was 212.9 (SD=56.0). After controlling for farm size, the number of pigs in Ontario, higher submission counts were associated with a weaker CAD$ versus US$, higher auction prices, and a PCVAD outbreak (P<0.001). The results suggest that both economic volatility and disease outbreaks in the Ontario swine industry drive submissions to the laboratory. In conclusion, lab submissions are a useful source of animal health data for disease surveillance; however, surveillance activities should also monitor the economics of the industry.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22494906     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  8 in total

1.  Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli F4, Pasteurella multocida, and Streptococcus suis isolates from a diagnostic veterinary laboratory and recommendations for a surveillance system.

Authors:  Shiona K Glass-Kaastra; David L Pearl; Richard J Reid-Smith; Beverly McEwen; Durda Slavic; Scott A McEwen; Jim Fairles
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Diagnostic testing patterns for Streptococcus equi subsp. equi in Ontario horses during the years 2008 to 2018.

Authors:  Gabrielle Brankston; Tanya M Rossi; Terri L O'Sullivan; Amy L Greer
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Visualization and application of disease diagnosis codes for population health management using porcine diseases as a model.

Authors:  Giovani Trevisan; Kent J Schwartz; Eric R Burrough; Bailey Arruda; Rachel J Derscheid; Michael C Rahe; Edison de Souza Magalhães; Marcelo N Almeida; Rodger G Main; Daniel C L Linhares
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 1.279

4.  Data standardization implementation and applications within and among diagnostic laboratories: integrating and monitoring enteric coronaviruses.

Authors:  Giovani Trevisan; Leticia C M Linhares; Kent J Schwartz; Eric R Burrough; Edison de S Magalhães; Bret Crim; Poonam Dubey; Rodger G Main; Phillip Gauger; Mary Thurn; Paulo T F Lages; Cesar A Corzo; Jerry Torrison; Jamie Henningson; Eric Herrman; Rob McGaughey; Giselle Cino; Jon Greseth; Travis Clement; Jane Christopher-Hennings; Daniel C L Linhares
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 1.279

Review 5.  Integrating novel data streams to support biosurveillance in commercial livestock production systems in developed countries: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  M Carolyn Gates; Lindsey K Holmstrom; Keith E Biggers; Tammy R Beckham
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2015-04-28

6.  The value of necropsy reports for animal health surveillance.

Authors:  Susanne Küker; Celine Faverjon; Lenz Furrer; John Berezowski; Horst Posthaus; Fabio Rinaldi; Flavie Vial
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 7.  Animal health syndromic surveillance: a systematic literature review of the progress in the last 5 years (2011-2016).

Authors:  Fernanda C Dórea; Flavie Vial
Journal:  Vet Med (Auckl)       Date:  2016-11-15

8.  Syndromic surveillance using veterinary laboratory data: algorithm combination and customization of alerts.

Authors:  Fernanda C Dórea; Beverly J McEwen; W Bruce McNab; Javier Sanchez; Crawford W Revie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.