Literature DB >> 22494060

An in vitro method for detecting chemical sensitization using human reconstructed skin models and its applicability to cosmetic, pharmaceutical, and medical device safety testing.

James M McKim1, Donald J Keller, Joel R Gorski.   

Abstract

Chemical sensitization is a serious condition caused by small reactive molecules and is characterized by a delayed type hypersensitivity known as allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Contact with these molecules via dermal exposure represent a significant concern for chemical manufacturers. Recent legislation in the EU has created the need to develop non-animal alternative methods for many routine safety studies including sensitization. Although most of the alternative research has focused on pure chemicals that possess reasonable solubility properties, it is important for any successful in vitro method to have the ability to test compounds with low aqueous solubility. This is especially true for the medical device industry where device extracts must be prepared in both polar and non-polar vehicles in order to evaluate chemical sensitization. The aim of this research was to demonstrate the functionality and applicability of the human reconstituted skin models (MatTek Epiderm(®) and SkinEthic RHE) as a test system for the evaluation of chemical sensitization and its potential use for medical device testing. In addition, the development of the human 3D skin model should allow the in vitro sensitization assay to be used for finished product testing in the personal care, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical industries. This approach combines solubility, chemical reactivity, cytotoxicity, and activation of the Nrf2/ARE expression pathway to identify and categorize chemical sensitizers. Known chemical sensitizers representing extreme/strong-, moderate-, weak-, and non-sensitizing potency categories were first evaluated in the skin models at six exposure concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 2500 µM for 24 h. The expression of eight Nrf2/ARE, one AhR/XRE and two Nrf1/MRE controlled gene were measured by qRT-PCR. The fold-induction at each exposure concentration was combined with reactivity and cytotoxicity data to determine the sensitization potential. The results demonstrated that both the MatTek and SkinEthic models performed in a manner consistent with data previously reported with the human keratinocyte (HaCaT) cell line. The system was tested further by evaluating chemicals known to be associated with the manufacture of medical devices. In all cases, the human skin models performed as well or better than the HaCaT cell model previously evaluated. In addition, this study identifies a clear unifying trigger that controls both the Nrf2/ARE pathway and essential biochemical events required for the development of ACD. Finally, this study has demonstrated that by utilizing human reconstructed skin models, it is possible to evaluate non-polar extracts from medical devices and low solubility finished products.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22494060     DOI: 10.3109/15569527.2012.667031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cutan Ocul Toxicol        ISSN: 1556-9527            Impact factor:   1.820


  9 in total

1.  Probabilistic hazard assessment for skin sensitization potency by dose-response modeling using feature elimination instead of quantitative structure-activity relationships.

Authors:  Thomas Luechtefeld; Alexandra Maertens; James M McKim; Thomas Hartung; Andre Kleensang; Vanessa Sá-Rocha
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 3.446

2.  Predicting full thickness skin sensitization using a support vector machine.

Authors:  Serom Lee; David Xu Dong; Rohit Jindal; Tim Maguire; Bhaskar Mitra; Rene Schloss; Martin Yarmush
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  A dual luciferase assay for evaluation of skin sensitizing potential of medical devices.

Authors:  Elisabeth Mertl; Elisabeth Riegel; Nicole Glück; Gabriele Ettenberger-Bornberg; Grace Lin; Sabrina Auer; Magdalena Haller; Angelika Wlodarczyk; Christoph Steurer; Christian Kirchnawy; Thomas Czerny
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 4.  In vitro methods for hazard assessment of industrial chemicals - opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Chin Lin Wong; Sussan Ghassabian; Maree T Smith; Ai-Leen Lam
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 5.  Testing Human Skin and Respiratory Sensitizers-What Is Good Enough?

Authors:  Anki Malmborg; Carl A K Borrebaeck
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Skin Sensitization Testing-What's Next?

Authors:  Gunilla Grundström; Carl A K Borrebaeck
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  A Multi-Organ-on-Chip Approach to Investigate How Oral Exposure to Metals Can Cause Systemic Toxicity Leading to Langerhans Cell Activation in Skin.

Authors:  Jasper J Koning; Charlotte T Rodrigues Neves; Katharina Schimek; Maria Thon; Sander W Spiekstra; Taco Waaijman; Tanja D de Gruijl; Susan Gibbs
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-02-15

8.  In Vitro and Clinical Safety Assessment of the Multiple W/O/W Emulsion Based on the Active Ingredients from Rosmarinus officinalis L., Avena sativa L. and Linum usitatissimum L.

Authors:  Ugne Zlabiene; Juste Baranauskaite; Dalia M Kopustinskiene; Jurga Bernatoniene
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 6.321

9.  Nano- and Micro-Porous Chitosan Membranes for Human Epidermal Stratification and Differentiation.

Authors:  Simona Salerno; Maria Penelope De Santo; Enrico Drioli; Loredana De Bartolo
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-27
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.