Literature DB >> 22494047

Aeromedical transfer of women at risk of preterm delivery in remote and rural Western Australia: why are there no births in flight?

Natalie Akl1, Edwina A Coghlan, Elizabeth A Nathan, Stephen A Langford, John P Newnham.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: For more than three decades, women at imminent risk of preterm birth (PTB) in Western Australia have been transferred by small aircraft over long distances to the single tertiary level perinatal centre in Perth, with no known case of birth during the flight. We aimed to review recent experience to understand how aircraft travel may delay PTB. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Retrospective observational study of 500 consecutive Royal Flying Doctor Service (RFDS) transfers of women at risk of preterm labour to the tertiary referral centre, from September 2007 to December 31, 2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In-flight delivery, complications associated with transfer and factors associated with delay in preterm delivery.
RESULTS: There were no in-flight deliveries or serious complications associated with the aeromedical transfer of these patients. In a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, clinical factors in the presentation that were associated with a shorter time from landing to subsequent delivery included cervical dilatation ≥ 4 cm, ruptured membranes, gestational age > 32 weeks and nulliparity. The aircraft reaching an ambient altitude > 14,000 feet, or cabin altitude above zero (sea level), was associated with a delay in time from landing to delivery for women who were not in spontaneous preterm labour.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings add to a 30-year experience that women at risk of preterm labour do not deliver during aeromedical transfer. Ambient and cabin altitude of the aircraft were associated with an extension in the time to delivery after arrival. The mechanisms underpinning this effect warrant further investigation.
© 2012 The Authors ANZJOG © 2012 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22494047     DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2012.01426.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  6 in total

1.  The interfacility transport of critically ill newborns.

Authors:  Hilary Ea Whyte; Ann L Jefferies
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2015 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  Progress and challenges in improving maternal health in the Tibet Autonomous Region, China.

Authors:  E Bjertness; E B McNeil; Y Guo; P Songwathana; V Chongsuvivatwong
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2018-11-14

3.  Pregnancy-related aeromedical retrievals in rural and remote Australia: national evidence from the Royal Flying Doctor Service.

Authors:  David Gonzalez-Chica; Marianne Gillam; Susan Williams; Pritish Sharma; Matthew Leach; Martin Jones; Lucie Walters; Fergus Gardiner
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Time-to-delivery after maternal transfer to a tertiary perinatal centre.

Authors:  Fiona H Hutchinson; Mark W Davies
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Healthcare factors associated with the risk of antepartum and intrapartum stillbirth in migrants in Western Australia (2005-2013): A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Maryam Mozooni; Craig E Pennell; David B Preen
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 6.  All the right moves: why in utero transfer is both important for the baby and difficult to achieve and new strategies for change.

Authors:  Helena Watson; James McLaren; Naomi Carlisle; Nandiran Ratnavel; Tim Watts; Ahmed Zaima; Rachel M Tribe; Andrew H Shennan
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-08-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.