Literature DB >> 2249378

Combined alpha/beta-blockade versus beta 1-selective blockade in essential hypertension in black and white patients.

R R Townsend1, D J DiPette, R Goodman, D Blumfield, R Cronin, A Gradman, L A Katz, E P McCarthy, G Sopko.   

Abstract

The purpose of this multicenter investigation was to determine the efficacy and safety of the alpha/beta-blocker labetalol versus the beta 1-selective beta-blocker atenolol in white and black patients with essential hypertension. Equal numbers of black and white patients were enlisted to form four treatment groups (white patients taking either labetalol or atenolol and black patients taking either labetalol or atenolol). Two hundred ninety-two patients (152 white and 140 black patients) with essential hypertension characterized by a standing diastolic blood pressure of 105 to 119 mm Hg (inclusive) were recruited for this trial. Patients were randomized to either labetalol (dosage titrated from 200 to 1600 mg/day) or atenolol (dosage titrated from 50 to 100 mg/day). The therapeutic goal was achievement of a standing diastolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or less or a fall of 15 mm Hg in diastolic pressure from baseline value at the end of the placebo run in period. At the end of the study there were no significant differences in blood pressure or heart rate changes in the supine position between the labetalol and atenolol groups. In contrast, labetalol produced greater reduction in both the standing systolic and diastolic blood pressure (-12/-13 mm Hg, respectively) compared with atenolol (-7/-9 mm Hg; p less than 0.05; p less than 0.005, respectively). The greatest decrease in blood pressure was observed in white patients receiving labetalol. In black patients the decrease in blood pressure was greater in those treated with labetalol compared with atenolol, particularly with respect to the systolic blood pressure. We conclude that the alpha 1-blocking property of labetalol provides an additional lowering of the blood pressure over that seen with beta 1-blockade alone, especially in the standing position, and this enhanced efficacy is not confined to one radical group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2249378     DOI: 10.1038/clpt.1990.210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  7 in total

Review 1.  Racial and ethnic differences in response to medicines: towards individualized pharmaceutical treatment.

Authors:  Valentine J Burroughs; Randall W Maxey; Richard A Levy
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.798

2.  Ethnic specific recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: a first exploratory comparison between guidelines from the USA, Canada, the UK, and the Netherlands.

Authors:  D R Manna; M A Bruijnzeels; H G A Mokkink; M Berg
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-10

Review 3.  Atenolol. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disorders.

Authors:  A N Wadworth; D Murdoch; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Overview of resistant hypertension: A glimpse of the cardiologist's current standpoint.

Authors:  Luis Paiva; Maria Carmo Cachulo; Rui Providencia; Sergio Barra; Paulo Dinis; Antonio Leitao-Marques
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2012-09-26

Review 5.  Clinical experience with dual-acting drugs in hypertension.

Authors:  K H Rahn
Journal:  Clin Investig       Date:  1992

Review 6.  Characterization and treatment of resistant hypertension.

Authors:  Roberto Pisoni; Mustafa I Ahmed; David A Calhoun
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Maternal ethnicity and its impact on the haemodynamic and blood pressure response to labetalol for the treatment of antenatal hypertension.

Authors:  D Stott; M Bolten; D Paraschiv; I Papastefanou; J B Chambers; N A Kametas
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2016-03-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.