| Literature DB >> 22493727 |
Soo Lim1, Sung Hee Choi, Hayley Shin, Bong Jun Cho, Ho Seon Park, Byung Yong Ahn, Seon Mee Kang, Ji Won Yoon, Hak Chul Jang, Young-Bum Kim, Kyong Soo Park.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recently, it has been suggested that enhancement of incretin effect improves cardiac function. We investigated the effect of a DPP-IV inhibitor, des-fluoro-sitagliptin, in reducing occurrence of restenosis in carotid artery in response to balloon injury and the related mechanisms. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22493727 PMCID: PMC3320861 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Plasma active GLP-1 (A) and glucagon (B) levels after 3 week treatment of sitagliptin.
Plasma active GLP-1 levels increased and glucagon levels decreased significantly in a dose-dependent manner (*p <0.05 compared with control and †p <0.05 compared with 100 mg/kg of sitagliptin treatment). In vivo inhibition of neointimal formation after 3 weeks of treatment with sitagliptin. C. H&E stained sections of the four groups (control and sitagliptin groups: 100, 250 and 500 mg/kg). D. Intima-media ratios (IMRs) in the three groups (n = 10 in each group). Treatment with sitagliptin produced a lower IMR than controls in a dose-dependent manner (the lower IMR with the higher dose of sitagliptin, p < 0.05 between control and 250 mg/kg or 500 mg/kg of sitagliptin groups).
Weight, biochemical parameters including glucose homeostasis, lipids, adipocytokines, and inflammatory markers according to the treatment groups.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Weight (g) | 588.4 | 27.4 | 590.0 | 32.7 | 585.8 | 35.5 | 597.0 | 28.4 | NS | |
| Fasting glucose (mg/dl) | 137.8 | 25.1 | 137.3 | 21.7 | 126.8 | 25.9 | 109.3 | 15.2 | 0.069 | C,E |
| Postload glucose (mg/dl) | 197.2 | 26.0 | 186.4 | 29.2 | 184.9 | 16.2 | 159.4 | 16.7 | 0.022 | C,E,F |
| AUCglucose | 579.9 | 45.0 | 563.9 | 42.8 | 536.1 | 37.4 | 521.9 | 40.4 | 0.035 | B,C |
| Insulin (pg/ml) | 108.6 | 50.8 | 119.4 | 61.0 | 90.2 | 40.1 | 97.1 | 10.4 | NS | |
| HOMA-IR | 38.4 | 22.6 | 42.3 | 27.0 | 27.7 | 11.7 | 26.4 | 6.3 | NS | |
| HOMA-B | 535.4 | 214.3 | 571.6 | 209.3 | 578.6 | 296.1 | 796.4 | 151.7 | NS | C |
| QUICKI | 0.15 | 0.01 | 0.15 | 0.01 | 0.16 | 0.01 | 0.16 | 0.01 | NS | |
| Total C (mg/dl) | 77.4 | 11.2 | 88.0 | 21.5 | 72.1 | 12.3 | 81.2 | 22.2 | NS | |
| Triglycerides (mg/dl) | 92.7 | 32.9 | 90.5 | 23.0 | 66.3 | 27.1 | 70.2 | 35.3 | NS | |
| HDL-C (mg/dl) | 24.7 | 3.0 | 26.1 | 5.7 | 23.4 | 7.9 | 27.8 | 7.1 | NS | |
| LDL-C (mg/dl) | 35.4 | 5.2 | 43.8 | 14.1 | 35.5 | 6.2 | 37.4 | 7.0 | NS | |
| Adiponectin (µg/ml) | 8.0 | 1.7 | 9.1 | 3.2 | 10.3 | 2.6 | 12.5 | 3.7 | 0.021 | C,E |
| HsCRP (mg/l) | 0.19 | 0.06 | 0.17 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.093 | C |
| TNFα (pg/ml) | 5.8 | 2.0 | 5.2 | 1.7 | 4.6 | 1.7 | 4.2 | 1.9 | NS | |
| IL6 (pg/ml) | 12.1 | 5.4 | 13.3 | 6.0 | 11.1 | 4.3 | 10.1 | 2.9 | NS | |
| MCP-1 (pg/ml) | 162.1 | 61.6 | 144.8 | 37.1 | 115.8 | 39.6 | 107.7 | 32.1 | 0.073 | B,C |
| PAI-1 (pg/ml) | 224.4 | 72.0 | 263.8 | 96.9 | 187.8 | 83.6 | 171.9 | 52.8 | NS | E |
Data are means±S.D, Key: sita, sitagliptin; AUCglucose, Area under the curve of glucose; HOMA-IR and HOMA-B, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance and β-cell function; QUICKI, quantitative insulin check index;
Statistical significance by oneway analysis of variances among groups.
Post hoc analysis by least significant difference t test (mean difference between two groups: A = Control vs. sita100, B = Control vs. sita250, C = Control vs. sita500, D = sita100 vs. sita250, E = sita100 vs. sita500, F = sita250 vs. sita500, P < 0.05 in all cases).
Figure 2Effects of sitagliptin treatment or normal saline as a control on proliferation and apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells.
A. Cell proliferation measured by immunostaining for proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) was markedly lower in the sitagliptin-treated groups than in the controls (open arrow). B. TUNEL staining of the three groups (open arrow). C. The proliferation index was significantly lower in the sitagliptin-treated groups than in the control group. There was a dose-dependent pattern in the level of proliferation between sitagliptin-treated groups (*p < 0.05 vs. control and †p < 0.05 vs. sitagliptin 100 mg/kg). D. Apoptosis index (%) at 2 weeks after balloon injury. Apoptosis was significantly higher in the sitagliptin -treated groups than in the control group, and there was a dose-dependent pattern in the level of apoptosis between sitagliptin-treated groups (*p < 0.05 vs. control and †p < 0.05 vs. sitagliptin 100 mg/kg).
Figure 3Immunofluorescent double staining for MMP2 (A) and MMP9 (C) expressing cells in tissue sections of injured arteries.
Double-staining was done with the anti-αSMA antibody (red) and anti-MMP2 or MMP9 antibody (green). Nucleus of cells was stained by DAPI (blue). MMP2 and MMP9 expressions were reduced by sitagliptin treatment (500 mg/kg) compared to control. Two scaled photos were displayed (×100 and ×400). Effect of sitagliptin on MMP2 (B) and MMP9 (D) expression in tissue sections of injured arteries (*p < 0.01 compared with control and †p < 0.01 compared with 100 mg/kg of sitagliptin treatment).
Figure 4Effects of sitagliptin on proliferation and migration of rat aortic smooth muscle cells (RAoSMC).
A. In MTT viability assays, cell proliferation was significantly decreased by sitagliptin treatment (*p < 0.05 compared with PDGF-BB only). B. TNFα-directed migration with sitagliptin treatment. C. Dose-dependent inhibiting pattern of TNFα-directed migration from 50 to 200 µg/mL (*p < 0.05 compared with TNFα treatment). D. Effects of sitagliptin on TNFα-stimulated monocyte adhesion using U937 cells. Open arrows indicate adhered monocytes. E. Dose-dependent inhibiting pattern of TNFα-stimulated monocyte adhesion (*p < 0.05 compared with TNFα treatment).
Figure 5Mechanistic experiment with small interfering RNA (siRNA) against DPP-IV and CARD11.
A. DPP-IV expression in VSMCs. The DPP-IV expression was knockdowned by siDPP-IV while it was not changed by treatment of PDGF-BB or TNFα. B. FBS- or PDGF-BB-induced cell proliferation was significantly attenuated by siDPP-IV transfection. C. Attenuation of TNFα- or PDGF-BB-induced NFκB activation by siDPP-IV transfection was also confirmed in EMSA assay. D. TNFα-induced NFκB activation was attenuated by sitagliptin treatment dose-dependently. E. Expression of CARD11 was decreased dose-dependently by sitagliptin treatment in VSMCs. F. CARD11 was expressed in VSMCs and its expression was knockdowned by siCARD11. G. TNFα-induced NFκB activation was decreased by siCARD11 transfection in EMSA assay.