Literature DB >> 22493543

Magnifying endoscopy in upper gastroenterology for assessing lesions before completing endoscopic removal.

Ning-Li Chai1, En-Qiang Ling-Hu, Yoshinori Morita, Daisuke Obata, Takashi Toyonaga, Takeshi Azuma, Ben-Yan Wu.   

Abstract

Any prognosis of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer is closely related to the stage of the disease at diagnosis. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and en bloc endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) have been performed as curative treatments for many early-stage GI lesions in recent years. The technologies have been widely accepted in many Asian countries because they are minimally invasive and supply thorough histopathologic evaluation of the specimens. However, before engaging in endoscopic therapy, an accurate diagnosis is a precondition to effecting the complete cure of the underlying malignancy or carcinoma in situ. For the past few years, many new types of endoscopic techniques, including magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI), have emerged in many countries because these methods provide a strong indication of early lesions and are very useful in determining treatment options before ESD or EMR. However, to date, there is no comparable classification equivalent to "Kudo's Pit Pattern Classification in the colon", for the upper GI, there is still no clear internationally accepted classification system of magnifying endoscopy. Therefore, in order to help unify some viewpoints, here we will review the defining optical imaging characteristics and the current representative classifications of microvascular and microsurface patterns in the upper GI tract under ME-NBI, describe the accurate relationship between them and the pathological diagnosis, and their clinical applications prior to ESD or en bloc EMR. We will also discuss assessing the differentiation and depth of invasion, defying the lateral spread of involvement and targeting biopsy in real time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; Endoscopic mucosal resection; Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging; Upper gastroenterology

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22493543      PMCID: PMC3319956          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i12.1295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  74 in total

1.  Magnification chromoendoscopy for the detection of intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus.

Authors:  P Sharma; A P Weston; M Topalovski; R Cherian; A Bhattacharyya; R E Sampliner
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Enhanced magnification endoscopy: a new technique to identify specialized intestinal metaplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  M Guelrud; I Herrera; H Essenfeld; J Castro
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  [Endoscopic diagnosis of tissue atypism (EA) in the pharyngeal and esophageal squamous epithelium; IPCL pattern classification and ECA classification].

Authors:  Haruhiro Inoue
Journal:  Kyobu Geka       Date:  2007-07

5.  Light blue crest sign, a favorable marker for predicting the severity of gastric atrophy in the entire stomach.

Authors:  T Tahara; T Shibata; M Nakamura; D Yoshioka; T Arisawa; I Hirata
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 6.  Tissue staining.

Authors:  M B Fennerty
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  1994-04

Review 7.  Endoscopic mucosal resection for early cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Roy Soetikno; Tonya Kaltenbach; Ronald Yeh; Takuji Gotoda
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-07-10       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Magnifying gastroendoscopy for diagnosis of histologic gastritis in the gastric antrum.

Authors:  S Kim; K Harum; M Ito; S Tanaka; M Yoshihara; K Chayama
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.088

9.  Surgical outcome of 483 patients with early gastric cancer: prognosis, postoperative morbidity and mortality, and gastric remnant cancer.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Onodera; Akira Tokunaga; Toshiro Yoshiyuki; Teruo Kiyama; Shunji Kato; Norio Matsukura; Gotaro Masuda; Takashi Tajiri
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb

10.  Squamous cell carcinoma in situ at oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal mucosal sites.

Authors:  Manabu Muto; Mari Nakane; Chikatoshi Katada; Yasushi Sano; Atsushi Ohtsu; Hiroyasu Esumi; Satoshi Ebihara; Shigeaki Yoshida
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and magnifying endoscopy for assessment of the invasion depth of shallow gastrointestinal neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhang Tao; Chen Yan; He Zhao; Jiawei Tsauo; Xiaowu Zhang; Bing Qiu; Yanqing Zhao; Xiao Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Is image-enhanced endoscopy useful for the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal tumor?

Authors:  Kyoung Oh Kim; Yang Suh Ku
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2013-05-31

3.  Image-enhanced endoscopy for diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal tumor.

Authors:  Viroj Wiwanitkit
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2013-07-31

4.  Feedback from artificial intelligence improved the learning of junior endoscopists on histology prediction of gastric lesions.

Authors:  Thomas K L Lui; Kenneth K Y Wong; Loey L Y Mak; Elvis W P To; Vivien W M Tsui; Zijie Deng; Jiaqi Guo; Li Ni; Michael K S Cheung; Wai K Leung
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2020-01-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.