Literature DB >> 22493071

Role of heart rate reduction in the prevention of experimental heart failure: comparison between If-channel blockade and β-receptor blockade.

Peter Moritz Becher1, Diana Lindner, Kapka Miteva, Konstantinos Savvatis, Christin Zietsch, Bastian Schmack, Sophie Van Linthout, Dirk Westermann, Heinz-Peter Schultheiss, Carsten Tschöpe.   

Abstract

To investigate whether heart rate reduction via I(f)-channel blockade and β-receptor blockade prevents left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, we studied ivabradine and metoprolol in angiotensin II-induced heart failure. Cardiac dysfunction in C57BL/6J mice was induced by implantation of osmotic pumps for continuous subcutaneous dosing of angiotensin II (1.8 mg/kg per day SC) over a period of 3 weeks. Ivabradine (10 mg/kg per day) and metoprolol (90 mg/kg per day), which resulted in similar heart rate reduction, or placebo treatments were simultaneously started with infusion of angiotensin II. After 3 weeks, LV function was estimated by conductance catheter technique, cardiac remodeling assessed by estimation of cardiac hypertrophy, fibrosis, and inflammatory stress response by immunohistochemistry or PCR, respectively. Compared with controls, angiotensin II infusion resulted in hypertension in impaired systolic (LV contractility, stroke volume, end systolic elastance, afterload, index of arterial-ventricular coupling, and cardiac output; P<0.05) and diastolic (LV relaxation, LV end diastolic pressure, τ, and stiffness constant β; P<0.05) LV function. This was associated with a significant increase in cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis. Increased cardiac stress was also indicated by an increase in cardiac inflammation and apoptosis. Both ivabradine and metoprolol led to a similar reduction in heart rate. Metoprolol also reduced systolic blood pressure. Ivabradine led to a significant improvement in systolic and diastolic LV function (P<0.05). This was associated with less cardiac hypertrophy, fibrosis, inflammation, and cardiac apoptosis (P<0.05). Metoprolol treatment did not prevent the reduction in cardiac function and adverse remodeling, despite a reduction of the inflammatory stress response. Behind heart rate reduction, additional beneficial cardiac effects contribute to heart failure prevention with I(f)-channel inhibition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22493071     DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.183913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  28 in total

1.  [New therapy concepts for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction].

Authors:  C Tschöpe; B Pieske
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 2.  Heart rate reduction in heart failure: ivabradine or beta blockers?

Authors:  Maya Guglin
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.214

3.  Bidirectional cross-regulation between ErbB2 and β-adrenergic signalling pathways.

Authors:  Polina Sysa-Shah; Carlo G Tocchetti; Manveen Gupta; Peter P Rainer; Xiaoxu Shen; Byung-Hak Kang; Frances Belmonte; Jian Li; Yi Xu; Xin Guo; Djahida Bedja; Wei Dong Gao; Nazareno Paolocci; Rutwik Rath; Douglas B Sawyer; Sathyamangla V Naga Prasad; Kathleen Gabrielson
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 10.787

4.  β-Blockers and ivabradine differentially affect cardiopulmonary function and left ventricular filling index.

Authors:  Ulrich Fischer-Rasokat; Jörg Honold; Denise Lochmann; Sebastian Wolter; Christoph Liebetrau; Stephan Fichtlscherer; Helge Möllmann; Ioakim Spyridopoulos; Christian W Hamm
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Complementary and Synergic Role of Combined Beta-blockers and Ivabradine in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure and Depressed Systolic Function: A New Therapeutic Option?

Authors:  Maurizio Volterrani; Ferdinando Iellamo
Journal:  Card Fail Rev       Date:  2016-11

Review 6.  Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: emerging drug strategies.

Authors:  Fouad A Zouein; Lisandra E de Castro Brás; Danielle V da Costa; Merry L Lindsey; Mazen Kurdi; George W Booz
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.105

7.  Ivabradine in Management of Heart Failure: a Critical Appraisal.

Authors:  Gabriela Orasanu; Sadeer G Al-Kindi; Guilherme H Oliveira
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2016-02

Review 8.  Heart rate reduction in coronary artery disease and heart failure.

Authors:  Roberto Ferrari; Kim Fox
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 32.419

9.  Ivabradine therapy to unmask heart rate-independent effects of β-blockers on pulse wave reflections.

Authors:  Ulrich Fischer-Rasokat; Jörg Honold; Denise Lochmann; Christoph Liebetrau; Jürgen Leick; Christian Hamm; Stephan Fichtlscherer; Helge Möllmann; Ioakim Spyridopoulos
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 10.  Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: current management and future strategies : Expert opinion on the behalf of the Nucleus of the "Heart Failure Working Group" of the German Society of Cardiology (DKG).

Authors:  Carsten Tschöpe; Christoph Birner; Michael Böhm; Oliver Bruder; Stefan Frantz; Andreas Luchner; Lars Maier; Stefan Störk; Behrouz Kherad; Ulrich Laufs
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 5.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.