Literature DB >> 22492886

Therapies for advanced cancers pose a special challenge for health technology assessment organizations in many countries.

Peter J Neumann1, Sarah K Bliss, James D Chambers.   

Abstract

Health technology assessment organizations evaluate medical therapies and technologies to help inform coverage and reimbursement decisions for payers around the globe. Even as they establish strict review processes, these organizations--and the reimbursement authorities that use their assessments--have sometimes handled cancer interventions with special care. We found that some countries have created separate health technology assessment pathways for cancer treatment, while others have eased access to cancer treatments through end-of-life or disease-severity exceptions within health technology assessment policies. In the United States, although no separate evaluation pathways exist for cancer, cancer drugs receive special status by virtue of unique Medicare rules covering off-label indications. Worldwide, we demonstrate that health technology assessment organizations are struggling with cancer's "exceptionalism."

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22492886     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  8 in total

Review 1.  Market access of cancer drugs in European countries: improving resource allocation.

Authors:  Kim Pauwels; Isabelle Huys; Minne Casteels; Katelijne De Nys; Steven Simoens
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 2.  Current challenges in health economic modeling of cancer therapies: a research inquiry.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Miller; Kathleen A Foley; Mason W Russell
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2014-05

3.  Is an Orphan Drug's Cost-Effectiveness Associated with US Health Plan Coverage Restrictiveness?

Authors:  James D Chambers; Nikoletta M Margaretos; Daniel E Enright; Rosa Wang; Xin Ye
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Patterns of cancer care costs in a country with detailed individual data.

Authors:  Tony Blakely; June Atkinson; Giorgi Kvizhinadze; Nick Wilson; Anna Davies; Philip Clarke
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Use of budget savings from patent expiration of cancer drugs to improve affordability and accessibility.

Authors:  Seung Mi Lee; Heui Jae Kim; David Suh; Kyung-In Joung; Eun Suk Kim; Hee Jung Back; Jun Young Kwon; Man-Jae Park; Dong Churl Suh
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Factors Affecting Usage Levels and Trends of Innovative Oncology Drugs Upon and After Reimbursement Under Taiwan National Health Insurance: Interrupted Time Series Analysis.

Authors:  Kai-Hsin Liao; Bor-Sheng Ko; Liang-Kung Chen; Fei-Yuan Hsiao
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 4.689

7.  Oncologists' and family physicians' views on value for money of cancer and congestive heart failure care.

Authors:  Dan Greenberg; Ariel Hammerman; Shlomo Vinker; Adi Shani; Yuval Yermiahu; Peter J Neumann
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2013-11-18

8.  Improving Patient Access to New Drugs in South Korea: Evaluation of the National Drug Formulary System.

Authors:  Seung-Lai Yoo; Dae-Jung Kim; Seung-Mi Lee; Won-Gu Kang; Sang-Yoon Kim; Jong Hyuk Lee; Dong-Churl Suh
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.