Literature DB >> 22492560

Cortical inhibition in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: new insights from the electroencephalographic response to transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Sarah Bruckmann1, Daniela Hauk, Veit Roessner, Franz Resch, Christine M Freitag, Thomas Kammer, Ulf Ziemann, Aribert Rothenberger, Matthias Weisbrod, Stephan Bender.   

Abstract

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder is one of the most frequent neuropsychiatric disorders in childhood. Transcranial magnetic stimulation studies based on muscle responses (motor-evoked potentials) suggested that reduced motor inhibition contributes to hyperactivity, a core symptom of the disease. Here we employed the N100 component of the electroencephalographic response to transcranial magnetic stimulation as a novel marker for a direct assessment of cortical inhibitory processes, which has not been examined in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder so far. We further investigated to what extent affected children were able to regulate motor cortical inhibition, and whether effects of age on the electroencephalographic response to transcranial magnetic stimulation were compatible with either a delay in brain maturation or a qualitatively different development. N100 amplitude evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation and its age-dependent development were assessed in 20 children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and 19 healthy control children (8-14 years) by 64-channel electroencephalography. Amplitude and latency of the N100 component were compared at rest, during response preparation in a forewarned motor reaction time task and during movement execution. The amplitude of the N100 component at rest was significantly lower and its latency tended to be shorter in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Only in controls, N100 amplitude to transcranial magnetic stimulation was reduced by response preparation. During movement execution, N100 amplitude decreased while motor evoked potential amplitudes showed facilitation, indicating that the electroencephalographic response to transcranial magnetic stimulation provides further information on cortical excitability independent of motor evoked potential amplitudes and spinal influences. Children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder showed a smaller N100 amplitude reduction during movement execution compared with control children. The N100 amplitude evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation decreased with increasing age in both groups. The N100 reduction in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder at all ages suggests a qualitative difference rather than delayed development of cortical inhibition in this disease. Findings further suggest that top-down control of motor cortical inhibition is reduced in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. We conclude that evoked potentials in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation are a promising new marker of cortical inhibition in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder during childhood.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22492560     DOI: 10.1093/brain/aws071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  23 in total

1.  The EEG correlates of the TMS-induced EMG silent period in humans.

Authors:  Faranak Farzan; Mera S Barr; Sylco S Hoppenbrouwers; Paul B Fitzgerald; Robert Chen; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Zafiris J Daskalakis
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  Safety of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Children: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Corey H Allen; Benzi M Kluger; Isabelle Buard
Journal:  Pediatr Neurol       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.372

3.  Motor cortical inhibition in ADHD: modulation of the transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked N100 in a response control task.

Authors:  Elisa D'Agati; Thomas Hoegl; Gabriel Dippel; Paolo Curatolo; Stephan Bender; Oliver Kratz; Gunther H Moll; Hartmut Heinrich
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation-electroencephalography responses in recovered and symptomatic mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Jussi Tallus; Pantelis Lioumis; Heikki Hämäläinen; Seppo Kähkönen; Olli Tenovuo
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  Maturation of interhemispheric signal propagation in autism spectrum disorder and typically developing controls: a TMS-EEG study.

Authors:  Tomasz A Jarczok; Merve Fritsch; Anne Kröger; Anna Lisa Schneider; Heike Althen; Michael Siniatchkin; Christine M Freitag; Stephan Bender
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  Motor cortex inhibition and modulation in children with ADHD.

Authors:  Donald L Gilbert; David A Huddleston; Steve W Wu; Ernest V Pedapati; Paul S Horn; Kathryn Hirabayashi; Deanna Crocetti; Eric M Wassermann; Stewart H Mostofsky
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  A Multimodal Imaging- and Stimulation-based Method of Evaluating Connectivity-related Brain Excitability in Patients with Epilepsy.

Authors:  Mouhsin M Shafi; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Catherine J Chu; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Bernard S Chang
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-11-13       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  TMS evoked N100 reflects local GABA and glutamate balance.

Authors:  Xiaoming Du; Laura M Rowland; Ann Summerfelt; Andrea Wijtenburg; Joshua Chiappelli; Krista Wisner; Peter Kochunov; Fow-Sen Choa; L Elliot Hong
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 9.  Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Pediatric Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): A Review.

Authors:  Belen Rubio; Aaron D Boes; Simon Laganiere; Alexander Rotenberg; Danique Jeurissen; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 1.987

10.  Event related potentials study of aberrations in voice control mechanisms in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Oleg Korzyukov; Natalie Tapaskar; Mark E Pflieger; Roozbeh Behroozmand; Anjli Lodhavia; Sona Patel; Donald A Robin; Charles Larson
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.