Literature DB >> 22492184

A comparison of reusable and disposable perioperative textiles: sustainability state-of-the-art 2012.

Michael Overcash1.   

Abstract

Contemporary comparisons of reusable and single-use perioperative textiles (surgical gowns and drapes) reflect major changes in the technologies to produce and reuse these products. Reusable and disposable gowns and drapes meet new standards for medical workers and patient protection, use synthetic lightweight fabrics, and are competitively priced. In multiple science-based life cycle environmental studies, reusable surgical gowns and drapes demonstrate substantial sustainability benefits over the same disposable product in natural resource energy (200%-300%), water (250%-330%), carbon footprint (200%-300%), volatile organics, solid wastes (750%), and instrument recovery. Because all other factors (cost, protection, and comfort) are reasonably similar, the environmental benefits of reusable surgical gowns and drapes to health care sustainability programs are important for this industry. Thus, it is no longer valid to indicate that reusables are better in some environmental impacts and disposables are better in other environmental impacts. It is also important to recognize that large-scale studies of comfort, protection, or economics have not been actively pursued in the last 5 to 10 years, and thus the factors to improve both reusables and disposable systems are difficult to assess. In addition, the comparison related to jobs is not well studied, but may further support reusables. In summary, currently available perioperative textiles are similar in comfort, safety, and cost, but reusable textiles offer substantial opportunities for nurses, physicians, and hospitals to reduce environmental footprints when selected over disposable alternatives. Evidenced-based comparison of environmental factors supports the conclusion that reusable gowns and drapes offer important sustainability improvements. The benefit of reusable systems may be similar for other reusables in anesthesia, such as laryngeal mask airways or suction canisters, but life cycle studies are needed to substantiate these benefits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22492184     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31824d9cc3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  15 in total

Review 1.  Isolation gowns in health care settings: Laboratory studies, regulations and standards, and potential barriers of gown selection and use.

Authors:  F Selcen Kilinc Balci
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 2.918

2.  Environmental impact of single-use, reusable, and mixed trocar systems used for laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

Authors:  Linn Boberg; Jagdeep Singh; Agneta Montgomery; Peter Bentzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 3.  [Sustainability in ophthalmology : Adaptation to the climate crisis and mitigation].

Authors:  Johannes Birtel; Heinrich Heimann; Hans Hoerauf; Horst Helbig; Christian Schulz; Frank G Holz; Gerd Geerling
Journal:  Ophthalmologie       Date:  2022-04-22

4.  Four Ways Plastic Surgeons Can Fight Climate Change.

Authors:  Ciara Brown; Clifton Meals
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-07-14

5.  A national survey on attitudes and barriers on recycling and environmental sustainability efforts among Canadian anesthesiologists: an opportunity for knowledge translation.

Authors:  Maria-Alexandra Petre; Lisa Bahrey; Mark Levine; Adriaan van Rensburg; Mark Crawford; Clyde Matava
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 6.  Does the type of surgical drape (disposable versus non-disposable) affect the risk of subsequent surgical site infection?

Authors:  David C Kieser; Michael C Wyatt; Andrew Beswick; Setor Kunutsor; Gary J Hooper
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-05-07

7.  Reduction of Health Care-Associated Infections (HAIs) with Antimicrobial Inorganic Nanoparticles Incorporated in Medical Textiles: An Economic Assessment.

Authors:  Finbarr Murphy; Anat Tchetchik; Irini Furxhi
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 8.  Environmental sustainability in anaesthesia and critical care.

Authors:  Forbes McGain; Jane Muret; Cathy Lawson; Jodi D Sherman
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 9.  Isolation Precautions in the Inpatient Setting.

Authors:  Emily W Gottenborg; Michelle A Barron
Journal:  Hosp Med Clin       Date:  2015-11-18

Review 10.  Sustainable Personal Protective Clothing for Healthcare Applications: A Review.

Authors:  Nazmul Karim; Shaila Afroj; Kate Lloyd; Laura Clarke Oaten; Daria V Andreeva; Chris Carr; Andrew D Farmery; Il-Doo Kim; Kostya S Novoselov
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 15.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.