Literature DB >> 22492164

A comparison of the prevalence of lead-contaminated imported Chinese ceramic dinnerware purchased inside versus outside Philadelphia's Chinatown.

Thomas Gilmore1, Gerald F O'Malley, Wayne Bond Lau, David R Vann, Adam Bromberg, Aaron Martin, Andrea Gibbons, Evan Rimmer.   

Abstract

Lead-contaminated ceramics can be a clinically significant source of lead poisoning, with the potential to cause illness in children and adults; one death in a child has been described. We hypothesized that the prevalence of lead-contaminated ceramics would be higher within Chinatown versus outside of Chinatown. The study was a prospective observational cross-sectional study. Two areas were defined geographically as being within and outside of Philadelphia's Chinatown, and a predefined number of items were purchased in each area. Each item was screened for lead utilizing a colorimetric testing swab. Positive items were leached for lead using the ASTM C738-94 protocol for lead level quantification. The primary outcome was the prevalence of ceramics not compliant with the FDA standard for leachable lead within and outside of Philadelphia's Chinatown. A total of 132 items were purchased, 46 outside of and 86 within Chinatown. More lead-positive items originated within Chinatown than outside of Chinatown [five positive items, 5.8 % prevalence within Chinatown (95 % confidence interval, CI, 2.5-12.9 %), and zero positive, 0 % prevalence outside of Chinatown (95 % CI 0-7.5 %)]. However, this difference was not found to be statistically significant (P = 0.1624). The leachable lead-positive items were up to 40-fold the acceptable FDA levels. Testing a larger number of items may demonstrate a significant source of lead exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22492164      PMCID: PMC3576496          DOI: 10.1007/s13181-012-0225-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Toxicol        ISSN: 1556-9039


  8 in total

1.  Acid extraction of lead and cadmium from newly-purchased ceramic and melamine dinnerware.

Authors:  R W Sheets
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  1999-08-30       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Lead-glazed ceramic ware and blood lead levels of children in the city of Oaxaca, Mexico.

Authors:  M I Azcona-Cruz; S J Rothenberg; L Schnaas; J S Zamora-Muñoz; M Romero-Placeres
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  2000 May-Jun

3.  Lead poisoning from cocktail glasses. Observations on two patients.

Authors:  E A Natelson; H L Fred
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1976-11-29       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Transfer of lead from lead-glazed ceramics to food.

Authors:  E González de Mejía; A L Craigmill
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Earthenware containers as a source of fatal lead poisoning.

Authors:  M Klein; R Namer; E Harpur; R Corbin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1970-09-24       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Childhood lead poisoning from commercially manufactured French ceramic dinnerware--New York City, 2003.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2004-07-09       Impact factor: 17.586

7.  Blood lead levels in pregnant women of high and low socioeconomic status in Mexico City.

Authors:  P Farias; V H Borja-Aburto; C Rios; I Hertz-Picciotto; M Rojas-Lopez; R Chavez-Ayala
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Lead-glazed ceramics as major determinants of blood lead levels in Mexican women.

Authors:  M Hernandez Avila; I Romieu; C Rios; A Rivero; E Palazuelos
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 9.031

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.