Literature DB >> 22491917

Vitreoretinal surgery in the setting of permanent keratoprosthesis.

Lee Kiang1, Kimberly C Sippel, Christopher E Starr, Jessica Ciralsky, Mark I Rosenblatt, Nathan M Radcliffe, Donald J D'Amico, Szilárd Kiss.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the surgical management of vitreoretinal pathology in patients with a permanent Boston Type 1 keratoprosthesis (hereafter referred to as a KPro) in the era of small-gauge vitrectomy techniques.
METHODS: Retrospective review of 23 small-gauge vitreoretinal surgical procedures during or after Dohlman-Doane KPro placement in 14 eyes.
RESULTS: Established and innovative techniques were used, including sutureless small-gauge vitrectomy, temporal positioning of surgeon, long-term tamponades, and exploratory endoscopy. Retro-KPro membranes formed less frequently when vitrectomy was performed during KPro placement. Anatomical goals were achieved, and no serious complications directly resulted from these techniques. Visual acuity, frequently limited by preexisting pathology, improved in most cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Modern posterior segment surgical techniques, including small-gauge sutureless vitrectomy, can be effectively used for patients with a permanent KPro. Vitrectomy and glaucoma tube revision by a team of subspecialists at the time of KPro placement may reduce subsequent complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22491917     DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.1115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  5 in total

1.  COMPARISON OF VISUAL AND ANATOMICAL OUTCOMES OF EYES UNDERGOING TYPE I BOSTON KERATOPROSTHESIS WITH COMBINATION PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY WITH EYES WITHOUT COMBINATION VITRECTOMY.

Authors:  Jennifer I Lim; Lindsay Machen; Andrea Arteaga; Faris I Karas; Robert Hyde; Dingcai Cao; Marcia Niec; Thasarat S Vajaranant; M Soledad Cortina
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Retinal detachments after Boston Keratoprosthesis: incidence, predisposing factors, and visual outcomes.

Authors:  Maria Stephanie R Jardeleza; Marc-Andre Rheaume; James Chodosh; Anne Marie Lane; Claes H Dohlman
Journal:  Digit J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-21

3.  A novel murine model for keratoprosthesis.

Authors:  Alja Crnej; Masahiro Omoto; Thomas H Dohlman; John M Graney; Claes H Dohlman; Brigita Drnovsek-Olup; Reza Dana
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 4.  Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis: Updated Perspectives.

Authors:  Manachai Nonpassopon; Muanploy Niparugs; Maria Soledad Cortina
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-29

Review 5.  Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis from patient selection through postoperative management: a review for the keratoprosthetic surgeon.

Authors:  Samantha L Williamson; M Soledad Cortina
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.