Literature DB >> 22491570

The PHILOS plate for proximal humeral fractures--risk factors for complications at one year.

Christian Spross1, Andreas Platz, Kaspar Rufibach, Thomas Lattmann, Jens Forberger, Michael Dietrich.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since 2003, we have used the Proximal Humerus Interlocking System plate for treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Although many patients have good and excellent results, the reported rate of complications varies. We have focused on the complication rate and risk factors for complications 1 year after surgery.
METHODS: From 2003 until 2008, a total of 294 (223 women; 71 men; median age, 72.9) patients were included. General data were collected at the time of injury (Charlson Index, smoking, and steroid therapy). Fractures were classified (AO/OTA) retrospectively. The follow-up of 1 year included radiographs and Constant-Murley score for functionality. Complications and revision surgeries were analyzed specifically.
RESULTS: We found 83 (28.2%) patients with a total of 105 complications, requiring a total of 72 (24.5%) revision surgeries. The most frequent complication was screw cutout (33 of 294, 11.2%), because of secondary fracture displacement or avascular necrosis (AVN). AVN (20 of 294, 6.8%) was the main reason for secondary arthroplasty. Smoking more than 20 pack years had a significant impact on the complication rate. Fractures classified 11-A3 showed more implant failures. Fracture dislocations predisposed to secondary screw cutout and AVN. Patients without complications (211, 71.8%) achieved a median Constant-Murley score of 89 (40-100) points.
CONCLUSION: This study points out several predisposing factors for negative outcome after open reduction and internal fixation with the Proximal Humerus Interlocking System plate (fracture type: 11-A3, fracture dislocations, and smoking). Accounting for these, patient's risk for complications can be evaluated more individually and taken into consideration for the concept of treatment. Altering the surgical technique was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of secondary screw cutout.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22491570     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31822c1b5b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg        ISSN: 2163-0755            Impact factor:   3.313


  28 in total

1.  Reply to: Can we decipher the indications and outcome of the PHILOS plate for fractures of the proximal humerus?

Authors:  Zu-Bin Zhou; You-Shui Gao; Ming-Jie Tang; Yu-Qiang Sun; Chang-Qing Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Long contoured locking plate fixation of traumatic proximal humeral fractures with distal extension.

Authors:  Joby J George Malal; Alistair I W Mayne; Faten Arouri; Ali M Noorani; Matthew Kent; Matt Smith; Inigo Guisasola; Peter Brownson
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2014-07-04

3.  The outcome of hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures is dependent on the status of the rotator cuff.

Authors:  Hiroshi Hashiguchi; Satoshi Iwashita; Atsushi Ohkubo; Shinro Takai
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  The Cost-Effectiveness of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Versus Open Reduction Internal Fixation for Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderly.

Authors:  Daniel C Austin; Michael T Torchia; Anna N A Tosteson; I Leah Gitajn; Stephanie J Tapp; John-Erik Bell
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2020

5.  Open reduction internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Marschall B Berkes; Milton T M Little; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-03

6.  Deltoid Tuberosity Index: A Simple Radiographic Tool to Assess Local Bone Quality in Proximal Humerus Fractures.

Authors:  Christian Spross; Nicola Kaestle; Emanuel Benninger; Jürgen Fornaro; Johannes Erhardt; Vilijam Zdravkovic; Bernhard Jost
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  [Prostheses for fractures of the proximal humerus: presentation of current results of anatomical fracture shoulder prosthesis under consideration of alternative concepts].

Authors:  G Pape; L Tonne; P Raiss; M Loew; F Zeifang
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Hemiarthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Lauchlan Chambers; Joshua S Dines; Dean G Lorich; David M Dines
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-03

9.  Rate of avascular necrosis and time to surgery in proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  L A Archer; A Furey
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-09-20

10.  Comparison between reverse shoulder arthroplasty and Humerusblock in three- and four-part proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients.

Authors:  Reinhold Ortmaier; Georg Mattiassich; Matthias Pumberger; Wolfgang Hitzl; Philipp Moroder; Alexander Auffarth; Herbert Resch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.