Literature DB >> 22491436

Comparison of reduction methods in intramedullary nailing of subtrochanteric femoral fractures.

Mustafa Seyhan1, Koray Unay, Nadir Sener.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of three reduction methods used during intramedullary nailing of the subtrochanteric femur fractures.
METHODS: This study included 45 patients with subtrochanteric femur fractures who were treated with intramedullary nailing. Twenty-two patients underwent clamp-assisted reduction, 11 reduction with cable cerclage, and 12 with blocking screws. Reduction techniques were compared with respect to the early postoperative alignment, one year postoperative alignment, time to full weight-bearing, time to union, Harris hip score at one year, operation and fluoroscopy times, blood transfusion amount, complications, and additional interventions.
RESULTS: The clamp-assisted reduction group had a statistically high mean time to full weight-bearing (p=0.038) and a low mean Harris hip score at one year (p=0.002). The blocking screw group's operation times and fluoroscopy times were statistically long. There was no statistically significant difference between the clamp-assisted reduction and cable cerclage groups in terms of operation times and fluoroscopy times. On the other hand, there were statistically significant differences between the clamp-assisted reduction and blocking screw groups (p=0.0001 and p=0.0001, respectively) and between the cable cerclage and blocking screw groups (p=0.037 p=0.0001, respectively) in terms of operation times and fluoroscopy times. There was no statistically significant difference between the clamp-assisted reduction, cable cerclage and the blocking screw groups in terms of early postoperative alignment, one year postoperative alignment, time to union, complications or additional interventions.
CONCLUSION: Clamp-assisted reduction leads to a longer time to weight-bearing and a poorer functional status at one year. Operation time and fluoroscopy time were longest in the blocking screw group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22491436     DOI: 10.3944/AOTT.2012.2639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc        ISSN: 1017-995X            Impact factor:   1.511


  8 in total

1.  [Repositioning, reduction and surgical approaches for subtrochanteric femoral fractures].

Authors:  B Ulmar; S Simon; I Stratos; T Mittlmeier
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  A study of 44 patients with subtrochanteric fractures treated using long nail and cerclage cables.

Authors:  P Persiani; G Noia; C de Cristo; J Graci; M D Gurzì; C Villani
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2015-10-29

3.  Four pins assisted reduction of complex segmental femoral fractures: a technique for closed reduction.

Authors:  Zhan-le Zheng; Xian Yu; Guo-Qiang Xu; Wei Chen; Ying-Ze Zhang; Zhen-Qing Jiao
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2014-12-06

Review 4.  Management of subtrochanteric fractures by nail osteosynthesis: a review of tips and tricks.

Authors:  Srinivas Kasha; Ranjith Kumar Yalamanchili
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur: update.

Authors:  Paulo Roberto Barbosa de Toledo Lourenço; Robinson Esteves Santos Pires
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2016-03-21

Review 6.  The use of 'blocking' screws for the 'closed' reduction of difficult proximal and distal femoral fractures.

Authors:  Christos Garnavos
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-06-28

7.  Nonunion of subtrochanteric fractures: Comminution or Malreduction.

Authors:  Sang Hyun Park; Gyu Min Kong; Byeong Ho Ha; Jun Ho Park; Kun Hyung Kim
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.088

Review 8.  Systematic review on the outcomes of poller screw augmentation in intramedullary nailing of long bone fracture.

Authors:  Maria Tennyson; Matija Krkovic; Mary Fortune; Ali Abdulkarim
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2020-03-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.